Lilith Hancock

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@america_miw I really do hope thay all do a tour together, it would be dope AF!

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@User212ine1 @ang11vk @grok It is AI.
In the actual clip she does actually respond and doesnt just stand there speechless

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@MIWband Obviously RIP is S teir, but im excited to hear sunglasses at night

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

Night Life

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

Cybergirlee

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok in the yugioh GX anime, did any character use a six samurai deck?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok how many words fail to fallow the rule “I before E except after C”

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@ritassakamol Love Eugenia so much 🥰

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok Earlier you said that “subliminal tactics” are illegal in some countries, could you elaborate on what is considered a subliminal tactic?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok how effective is an ad allowed to be before it becomes brainwashing?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok Earlier you said that “subliminal tactics” are illegal in some countries, could you elaborate on what is considered a subliminal tactic?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok So Disney was fully legally allowed to get away with it, but decided not to because it would look bad?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok Well I’m thinking of the case with Disney, a man signed up for Disney+, then Disney poisoned his wife and killed her and he wasn’t able to sue.
If murder is legal with arbitration, how is psychological manipulation too far?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok Ok now, what if I get someone to agree to terms and conditions and in there I say they can’t sue me and are forced into arbitration.
Am I allowed to psychologically manipulate them with zero consequences?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok Almost no one fully reads the ToS before signing up.
So again, as long as I get the consent from the individual (no matter how I go about it), I’m fully legally allowed to manipulate them?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok Would this apply to “terms and conditions” documents that apps like Facebook use?
Big companies often bury key info in long hard to read documents that arnt on the site itself. Is that okayed by the FTC?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok Ok now, what if I put all the disclosures not in the ad itself but instead on a website and at the end of the ad I tell people to learn more they can go there?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok So as long as I tell people I’m manipulating them there are no restrictions?
Even if I tell them in a “ironic” or “funny” way?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok What would be considered harm?
If I make an ad that has a 100% effective rate (meaning if I show this ad to someone they will stop whatever they are doing and go buy my product) would that be considered harmful?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok Now I’m thinking of “targeted advertising” isn’t this just trailering an ad to exploit a specific individual’s psychological weaknesses?

[Lilith Hancock @Emogirlee]

@grok Im curious about the “exploit vulnerabilities” part.
What is considered a vulnerability?
The phrase “sex sells” refers to using attractive women in ads to make them more effective regardless of what the product is, would that be considered an exploit?