Yet again please ignore any messages you receive from ‘me’ thanking you for following me. Hacked again, even after changing password etc,
Ready to deactivate account as this is getting ridiculous!
Yet again please ignore any messages you receive from ‘me’ thanking you for following me. Hacked again, even after changing password etc,
Ready to deactivate account as this is getting ridiculous!
not only is she in business casual HR administrative wear, but she also dances like she's the one who issued the bonus checks at the company holiday party YES LITTLE BOSS LADY ENJOY YOUR PTO
After nine years of legal battles, a British judge has finally challenged the wall of secrecy erected by British and Swedish authorities around the legal abuse of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
Judge Foss, sitting at the London First-Tier Tribunal, has ruled that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) must explain how it came to destroy key files that would have shed light on why it pursued Assange for 14 years. The CPS appears to have done so in breach of its own procedures.
Assange was finally released from Belmarsh high-security prison last year in a plea deal after Washington had spent years seeking his extradition for publishing documents revealing US and UK war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The CPS files relate to lengthy correspondence between the UK and Sweden over a preliminary investigation into rape allegations in Sweden that predate the US extradition case.
A few CPS emails from that time were not destroyed and have been released under Freedom of Information rules. They show that it was the UK authorities pushing reluctant Swedish prosecutors to pursue the case against Assange. Eventually, Swedish prosecutors dropped the case after running it into the ground.
In other words, the few documents that have come to light show that it was the CPS – led at that time by Keir Starmer, later knighted and now Britain’s prime minister – that waged what appears to have been a campaign of political persecution against Assange, rather than one based on proper legal considerations.
It is not just Britain concealing documents relating to Assange. The US, Swedish and Australian authorities have also put up what Stefania Maurizi, an Italian journalist who has been doggedly pursuing the FoI requests, has called “a wall of darkness”.
There are good grounds for believing that all four governments have coordinated their moves to cover up what would amount to legal abuses in the Assange case.
Starmer headed the CPS when many highly suspect decisions regarding Assange were made. If the documents truly have been destroyed, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to ever know how directly he was involved in those decisions.
Extraordinarily, and conveniently for both the UK and Sweden, it emerged during legal hearings in early 2023 that prosecutors in Stockholm claim to have destroyed the very same correspondence deleted by the CPS.
The new ruling by Judge Foss will require the CPS to explain how and why it destroyed the documents, and provide them unless it can demonstrate that there is no way they can ever be retrieved. Failure to do so by February 21 will be treated as contempt of court.
The UK and the US have similarly sought to stonewall separate FoI requests from Maurizi concerning their lengthy correspondence while Washington sought to extradite Assange on "espionage" charges for revealing their war crimes.
The British judiciary approved locking Assange up for years while the extradition case dragged on, despite United Nations legal experts ruling that Assange was being “arbitrarily detained” and the UN’s expert on torture, Nils Melzer, finding that Assange was being subjected to prolonged psychological torture that posed a threat to his life.
A link to this article, Judge threatens to break the UK's wall of secrecy around Assange's persecution, with supporting links, can be found in the next post in this thread. ⬇️
My friend tried to withdraw £20k from Natwest bank & their response was shocking
For 30 years my friend has been a loyal customer
He called to withdraw the money & they said no
He went into the branch and asked face to face to withdraw the £20k and they asked 'what it’s for'
He said ’none of your business, it’s my money’
They said ‘unless you can tell us exactly what the money is for, you cannot withdraw it'
This should shock & terrify you.
Your own money isn’t even yours anymore
Journalist Richard Medhurst could face years in prison if he refuses to hand over passwords for his electronic devices to the British police.
This is an obscene threat on journalism and the UK media has been totally silent on it.
Read this by @SMaurizi:
https://t.co/ZJrAuzXmKX
If Keir Starmer had said before the election that he would remove the winter fuel allowance from millions of pensioners, betray WASPI women, add inheritance to family farms, council tax & energy price increases, raise university tuition fees, plaster mass-scale solar panels on thousands of acres of prime farmland despite huge local community objections, spaff £22bn of taxpayers’ money on carbon capture machines, give £3bn a year of taxpayers’ money to Ukraine, pledge a 20% cut in meat & dairy and get exposed for receiving over £100,000 worth of freebies - he almost certainly wouldn’t have won. He duped the electorate. An utterly shameless display of snake oil political salesmanship. And yet he still lectures all of us in that gratingly sanctimonious manner of his like we are all somehow the problem.
Heartbreaking news for the Fulham Family.I was lucky enough to know Zach. The bravest, sweetest kid you could ever meet. Tragically he has lost his 3 yr battle with leukaemia.
Let’s get a 13th minute applause going this Sunday for one of own! Pls share and let’s make this happen