This paper gives a fancy name to a problem you can already feel in your bones
"The Tragedy of the Cognitive Commons." Checking AI output requires deep expertise. Deep expertise comes from doing grunt work for years. And grunt work is the first thing AI eats
So we're building systems that need expert supervision while dismantling the only known process for making experts
The paper calls the shared pool of human expertise the "cognitive commons." Every profession drinks from it. Nobody's refilling it.
By eliminating junior roles, each company is acting totally rationally, and the collective result: a profession that can't catch AI's mistakes anymore because it never learned to do the work in the first place
Who checks AI's homework in 15 years?
when youโre reading a really good fanfic with maybe a few mistakes but its ok cause thatโs how you know its written by humans.
and then, out of nowhere, you can see it. Steady, softly, calmly.
not exactly obvious, but there.
just like a washing machine trying to use soap.
indonesian artist, pls start charging foreigners your usual local price but change the currency from IDR to USD without conversion
half body 500K USD ๐ซต
Actually, writing IS in fact just a hobby that ANYONE can do, for fun, and be bad at it, and have zero interest of treating it as โa skill and craftโ and continue to do it even if theyโre bad at it โจ๐