I’mTheBeth

🚫Lists🚫Porn🚫Trolls 🚫Bots🚫Bigots🚫Racists‼️ If you gotta argue ... 𝑮𝑶 𝑬𝑳𝑺𝑬𝑾𝑯𝑬𝑹𝑬! I don’t have time for crazy 🤯 #MAGA

[I’mTheBeth @EnigmaOfCatch22]

People criticizing Kash, Bongino and even Bondi need to read this and really think about what he’s saying.

[Jim Verdi @jjverdi]

I have to address the trashing of Kash and Dan. Caveat: I have not spoken to Dan since he left the show, I've only texted with him about things not at all related to work. This is going to take a minute so bear with me.

When we first started the radio show, we had 2 months to put everything together: the production elements, discussion of how it was going to work, putting the clock together, recording bumpers, etc. We then had a week of practice before going on the air. When we hit the air, it took months of angst and tinkering, and making changes before we finally hit our stride. And do you know what we didn't have? A cabal of people lined up working against our success, in fact trashing us at every turn. That's something we didn't have to face.

So, then Dan decides to leave his highly successful, multi-million dollar job, while launching a new network, to take a job in the government, giving up a lot of money, family time, and freedom to try to do what he's talked about on the podcast and the radio, at a great risk to his reputation if the status quo was to remain. Who does that? I'll, tell you who: A guy who has talked about a problem for years and wants to be involved in stopping it.

So why have you "seen no results?" Kash has been there 6 weeks and Dan's been there a month. Ask yourself, if you took the job, what are the first things you're doing overseeing an organization with 38,000 people, with half to more than half determined to sabotage everything you want to do? You don't know who they are yet, you don't know what they're doing to sabotage you, you have scores of investigations open, millions of documents and data to go through, you're getting emails and reports from so many people, you have to decipher what is real and what is not, and you've only had less than a month? Does this sound like the ideal situation to jump into after you've run your own businesses the way you wanted because you were in charge and knew the people you worked with and if they were loyal to you or not? Do you want the agency run the way it was, not paying attention to the rule of law, not having the evidence you need to prosecute someone, just doing it because it will feed the base red meat only to blow up in your face within months, weeks or days?

Does this sound like a recipe to have immediate action taken against individuals or entities just because you've been waiting for it? If you want to assume you should this is what he took the job for, giving up everything he's had to give up, you're delusional and you really don't want to see any real lasting change made.

How can I be certain of all this? Because I know him. And I know the kind of person is. And I know he's working to improve the agency, the government and the country because he loves it and is a real patriot and he would not have taken the job unless he could effect some real change. Don't think he's not working every single day to do just that, and not for him, because he didn't need this. He's doing this for you.

[Lynne Sczruba @AZLady1916]

@VigilantFox John Adams understood that the pursuit of liberty & happiness could not be managed by mere words on paper. Those things must be defined within a moral framework. America, one nation under God.

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

Have you ever heard the Declaration of Independence read out loud?

You should. It’s the greatest break-up letter ever written.

At just 33 years old, Thomas Jefferson, with cold moral clarity, told the British government to pound sand:

“Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends [life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness], it is the Right of the People to alter or to ABOLISH it.”

The power of that line isn’t just what it says. It’s how it’s said.

Jefferson wasn’t writing from a place of outrage. He was transmitting conviction—moral clarity delivered from a steady frame of mind.

It’s said Jefferson revised the Declaration of Independence with the help of Franklin and Adams dozens of times before it was finalized.

And that deliberate, cutting language, paired with emotional steadiness, is precisely why the words still land 250 years later.

Today, we’re blessed to be the inheritors of the great nation those steady hands wrote into existence.

Happy Birthday, America. 🇺🇸

[Gypsymagic @gypsymagic24]

@MAGAVoice @Heman_Save_Can Any Canadian booing America needs to pull out a map. Size does matter. I live right on the border and I’m in the US weekly. Trump is not responsible for our downfall. The liberal government and the people who continuously vote for them are.

[Patricia 🇺🇸 @1109Patricia]

Good morning
🇺🇸Happy 4th of July🇺🇸

“Lord, on this Independence Day, we thank You for the freedoms You’ve blessed America with for over two hundred fifty years. Please continue to guide our leaders with wisdom, protect our liberties, and unite our people in peace and purpose. May we always cherish and defend the blessings of liberty. Amen.”

“Gracious Father, on this Fourth of July, we pause to remember the courage of those who fought for our independence. Strengthen our hearts to value truth, justice, and unity. Guard our nation from division, keep our freedoms strong, and help every citizen walk with gratitude and responsibility.

Heavenly Father, we lift up President Trump to You today. Surround him with Your divine protection, shield him from all harm, and give him supernatural strength and wisdom. Equip him with everything he needs to stand against the unseen evil that threatens our nation. Guide his steps, guard his heart, and let Your light shine through him. In Your mighty name, Amen.

[DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 @1Nicdar]

💯 💯 💯

The once mighty Florida orange groves are now mass expanses of tract houses and retirement communities as far as the eye can see. They'll never return. 🍊 😢

[Robert Spencer @jihadwatchRS]

Congress Should Not Seat America’s Enemies
by Daniel Greenfield

After the New York and New Jersey Democratic primaries, it now seems likely that the next freshman class of the House will include Dariazila Avila Chevalier, a Muslim convert who co-founded an organization that tweeted “Death to America” and who bragged, “I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag” as well as Hisham ‘Adam’ Hamawy: an associate of the Blind Sheikh terrorist leader who testified on his behalf at his terror trial.

The success of DSA (Democratic Socialists of America) candidates with Marxist and Communist views (Dariazila appears to have also praised Stalin) has captured headlines even as most people, including those in Congress, have forgotten what happened the first time a socialist won a House seat.

In 1919, the House voted 309-1 not to seat Rep. Victor L. Berger, the first socialist congressman, based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress” if they “shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

It was WWI and Berger’s Marxist rag was anti-war. “The one and only issue in this case is that of Americanism,” the House Special Committee that excluded Berger found. “It is whether a man who in 1911 took an oath as a member of the House to support the Constitution of the United States and who, when this country declared war against the Imperial German Government, became the head and front of an organized conspiracy to hinder, obstruct, and embarrass the Government in its fight for existence, should be admitted to membership in this House simply because a constituency in one of our States has seen fit to give him a plurality of its vote.”

Berger’s Socialist Party of America splintered into two parties, one of them, the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee, whose red rose symbol is carried on by its successor, the Democratic Socialists of America or the DSA that is currently taking over the Democrats.

Some might dismiss this as ancient history, a WWI proceeding based on a Civil War amendment, but it was the Democrats who decided to revive it in recent years, citing Berger’s case, among others, during their campaign to bar President Trump and pro-Trump members of Congress from running for reelection.

Read more at the link in the next post.

[Mike Collins @MikeCollinsGA]

No better place to kick off July Fourth weekend than with friends and patriots at Jackson Lake last night.

Happy Fourth of July, and happy 250th anniversary to our great country!

[Michael Weinstein @Weinstein_mj]

@SaltyGoat17 @FFT1776

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

A Colorado teacher REFUSED to allow a 13-year-old student to present her Pro-Life poem for the class because it’s "offensive."

MILLIONS have now listened to her poem and her story.

If you haven't heard it yet, @StudentsforLife made an amazing video of her reading it!

Give it a watch and a share! 👇

[Tony Seruga @TonySeruga]

The House Just Voted for KOSA, a Privacy and Free Speech Disaster

The House voted Monday night to build the machinery for online identity checks into federal law, packaging the mandate into a bundle of kids' online safety bills that cleared the chamber 267-117, with 47 members not voting.

It marks the first time any version of the Kids Online Safety Act, known as KOSA, has escaped the lower chamber, and the version that survived carries a structure that pushes platforms to figure out who you are before you can use them.

The legislation, called the Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act, or KIDS Act (H.R. 7757), stitches together more than a dozen separate bills, including KOSA, the SCREEN Act, the SAFE BOTs Act, COPPA 2.0, and the SPY Kids Act, as well as data broker rules and research initiatives.

House leaders rushed it to the floor under suspension of the rules, a fast-track path requiring a two-thirds majority. Committee Chairman Brett Guthrie and ranking Democrat Frank Pallone, who announced their agreement a week earlier, said the bill would “hold Big Tech accountable” and described months of cross-aisle work toward what Guthrie called a “workable compromise.”

If you’ve been following our updates, you’ll know the accountability positioning hides the actual design. The bill defines “know” or “knows” to mean “to know or should have known,” and that phrase runs through sections covering platforms, AI chatbots, and gaming services.

A company that fails to spot a minor faces legal exposure, which gives every platform a reason to gather more information about everyone who shows up. The text tries to defuse this, stating that nothing in it may be construed “to require the provider of a covered platform to implement an age gating or age verification functionality on the covered platform.”

The reassurance collapses on contact. A platform forbidden from ignoring a user’s age, yet liable the moment it “should have known” someone was a minor, has one move left. It starts checking ages, deploying age-estimation tools, demanding ID, or watching behavior closely enough to guess. The law does not order surveillance outright; it engineers the incentive and lets companies build the rest.

That is the First Amendment problem dressed as a child-safety provision. Verifying age means verifying identity, and identity checks sit between a person and ordinary protected activity, whether that is reading, watching, posting, or speaking. Adult websites would face explicit age-verification requirements under the package, which effectively means every visitor must prove who they are before viewing lawful content. Anonymous and pseudonymous speech, the kind the Supreme Court has shielded for decades, gets harder to find the more platforms lean on identity to limit their liability.

The bill tightens how data brokers handle children’s information and updates the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act to widen its reach.

But, to do that, it would require platforms that know a user is a minor to offer controls that limit communications, restrict geolocation sharing, cut compulsive-use features, and let users opt out of personalized recommendation systems, with default settings for minors set to what the bill calls “the most protective level of control with respect to privacy and safety.”

These are strong protections on paper and would be good if they applied evenly to all users. Still, they all depend on the platform identifying minors first, which loops straight back to the same question of how much data is pulled from users, adult or not, to identify the children.

The encryption language carries the same gap. The bill says platform requirements may not override encrypted communications and that companies must comply in ways that “do not compromise the integrity of strong encryption.” That could read as a shield until you notice that regulatory pressure to monitor behavior or flag certain users can hollow out encryption without ever formally banning it. Compliance routes around the protection the text claims to offer.

Getting the package across the floor cost the duty of care provision, the piece many child-safety groups and KOSA’s Senate authors consider the heart of the bill. The text now states that nothing in it may be construed to “impose a duty of care on a provider of a covered platform.”

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a KOSA co-author, wrote that “KOSA without a duty of care isn’t KOSA,” and said last week that the House version is “dead in the Senate.” Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), the other co-author, agrees the provision was central. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, told reporters he stays open to negotiating with the House.

That stalemate is the most encouraging thing about this whole fight.

The Senate’s standalone KOSA (S.1748) keeps the duty of care, which would legally require platforms to “exercise reasonable care” to prevent broad categories of harm to minors. On the free speech axis, that is the more dangerous of the two bills, not the safer one. A duty of care over vaguely defined harms compels companies to police or re-engineer recommendation algorithms for lawful, constitutionally protected content, under threat of liability so open-ended that the rational corporate response is to over-remove anything that might draw a lawsuit.

So neither chamber holds the civil-liberties high ground. The Senate bill compels platforms to suppress protected speech. In contrast, the House bill conscripts them into identity verification, and a conference committee tasked with reconciling the two could just as easily graft the worst of each onto a single law as split the difference.

The good news for anyone who values either anonymity or free expression is that the two chambers, each representing a different type of civil liberties disaster, do not appear close to agreement.

Blumenthal and Blackburn have written off the House version, House Republicans spent four years refusing the Senate’s duty of care over censorship fears, and nothing in the current standoff suggests that gap is about to close. Gridlock, in this case, is the protection the bills themselves do not provide.

Guthrie defended the result from the floor. “While no single bill will solve every challenge facing families online, this legislation represents a significant and long-overdue step forward in establishing meaningful safeguards,” he said. “It is an important milestone, not a finish line, in the effort to better protect children online and hold bad actors accountable.”

Blackburn is running a separate track in the Senate, negotiating with the White House over a deal that could carry the Senate version of KOSA. Two sources familiar with those talks said the White House told several tech and policy organizations this month that the package might also fold in the House’s version of the App Store Accountability Act, along with language preempting some state laws, which would override the stronger protections states have written into their own books.

The agreement still needs Senate approval and President Trump’s signature, neither of which looks imminent. What it offers, if it ever gets there, is a federal blueprint for the same identity-gated internet other countries have spent the past few years assembling, sold under the banner of protecting children and built to make proving who you are the price of going online.

Stand against censorship and surveillance: join Reclaim The Net >>> https://t.co/FjUmmaH9h9

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

Rockdale County resident who’s a sound engineering graduate shares shocking information on Data Centers

Data centers produce continuous low-frequency noise at <20 Hz, which is below normal human hearing. It’s comes from their mechanical cooling systems, power generators and more. It is extremely difficult to block and it travels through solid objects including walls, floors, even the ground

This continuous frequency causes permanent hearing damage, vestibular (balance) issues, elevated cortisol levels, stress, chronic fatigue, headaches, sleep disturbances, cardiovascular and respiratory problems, vibroacoustic disease that is thickening of heart structures and severe physical and psychological distress

The county is already facing a high mental health crisis and now these data centers will add to it with this low content frequency that no one can hear

This is extremely dangerous and something that is definitely going to impact the country nationally

[James Woods @RealJamesWoods]

The hysteria over the unsurprising resent decisions of the Roberts Court shines a light on the real problem facing America today. Of the three branches of government, we currently have an activist Judiciary, a powerful Executive, but a flat tire when it comes to the Legislative branch.

Birthright citizenship, for example, was not expected to be overturned by the Supreme Court. Congress could easily establish common sense legislation that would define more clearly the original purpose and boundaries intended by the 14th Amendment. That would, however, require John Thune to act like an American statesman rather than a RINO hack, so there is, as usual, no hope.

As long as the pansy-ass Republicans mince around the halls of Congress, we are doomed.

[Josh Howerton @howertonjosh]

I'm going to read the FIRST prayer delivered to the Continental Congress and it's going to blow your mind.

Why have they fought so hard to erase this part of our history. I'm glad you asked 👇

[Woohoo22 🇺🇸🕊️🌎 @Woohoo22923805]

@RNCResearch After watching this place for the past couple of years, I am really worried that the left is gonna make it so unpleasant to be there that good people will no longer run for office. Think about that people come November, because it truly is all on the line this time.

[RNC Research @RNCResearch]

Rep. Pramila Jayapal tells the parents of those murdered by illegal aliens that she has better things to do:

"Unfortunately this hearing is the 4th time in this committee that we’ve had a hearing on sanctuary cities... There's many other things that we could be doing.”

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

A new bill called ‘The Bow Wow Act’ was introduced to deport illegal aliens who enter America and abuse animals

The bill was introduced and “every Democrat voted against this”

Here’s a list of prominent Democrats who voted to allow illegals to abuse animals:

Hakeem Jeffries (NY)
Nancy Pelosi (CA)
Pramila Jayapal (WA)
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY)
Ilhan Omar (MN)
Rashida Tlaib (MI)
Jamie Raskin (MD)
Maxine Waters (CA)
Jerrold Nadler (NY)
Steny Hoyer (MD)

Nearly all House Democrats 190 out of 205 who voted, voted against the bill. They want illegals to be able to abuse animals and not be deported

Who needs enemies when you have Democrats

[Sheri Herman @SheriHerman19]

@WallStreetApes The GOP could end this judicial coup by impeaching these activist judges. So why won't they?

Because they seek a return to the way life was before Trump. As "Countryclub Republicans, they profit handsomely off of their political status with little effort.