@yarbatman Except very rarely, war is not a popular mandate. Hawks have spent decades honing the craft of shaping the narrative and commandeering the institutions *against* the will of the people.
Because hawks are not political actors, they are bureaucratic actors.
They were never that interested in generating a political mandate for their interventionism. They focused on commandeering institutions to advance their world view and aims.
What looks like wind in their sails is actually just the grinding momentum of a U.S. government that really only knows how to wage war,
War is the mission irrespective of the mandate. The hawks made it so.
@TheStalwart@LJKawa Really we are talking about Malaysian datacenters. The smuggling allegations are not about the legitimate datacenters about as much as voter ID is not about the legitimate black vote.
@TheStalwart Hawks knew that if they didn’t fan the flames, we might have peace. You see this with the Jensen saga too. Now we have a new set of scandals to be outraged about.
@therajmahal_1@TheStalwart@SemiAnalysis_ The hawks argue this. Industry finds it convenient if it wins legislative support, but hawks are going too far right now
@policytensor they’re just going around in circles so you play whack a mole. All the hands are weak; they just want to force a fold because it *looks* overwhelming.
@teortaxesTex You can watch these accounts trial ballooning different theories of responsibility to see what sticks. It’s very savvy and sophisticated actually
NEW: In a tense late-summer meeting, Jensen Huang called his Chief Financial Officer Colette Kress a “deer in the headlights.”
His concern: Nvidia’s plans to fund the AI boom with its balance sheet were running into problems. He needed to figure it out.
He called her a “reporting CFO,” not someone who could help him define a strategy or make decisions.
With @RWhelanWSJ for @WSJ
https://t.co/V0gmpNYD2z