We are away from the house and safe. Had a horrible week still though with everything just getting more and more out of control and this last few weeks my whole life is upside down. When I get back I still need to work on moving and trying to get things back on track after going through hell as a family and im not even sure i see the light on the other side yet. The police where I am have been really helpful and supportive though so thats better.
We are struggling to get by though atm after having to pick uo and flee last min. We wouldn't of even been able to get away without the help of everyone and im so greatful and I will be eternally. I cant say that once we have been away things have been great, because they have actually been horrible, but atleast i know my kids are safe.
https://t.co/5Kn65MPRd8
https://t.co/hB0fpCneML
#GreaterManchester needs change. It needs someone who will work for everyone and not just property speculators or the companies linked to Andy Burnham’s wife, or Chinese investors buying homes when Manchester’s homeless numbers grow….
Justice For Ann🙏: The sad inevitable truth will be that the vast majority of the public will move on and away from the political assassination of Ann Widdecombe in time.
Princess Diana was murdered before the eyes of the world that fateful night in Paris August the 31st 1997, along with the allegations made by Diana and her closest acquaintances that her former husband KC3 was planning to have her liquidated.
A small section of the global public still talk about her murder/death, some writing books making documentaries and even conferences.
With the insanely fast news cycle this demonic slaying or an elderly right-wing politician will get added to the unsolved mystery murders and dubious convictions.
For those who truly loved and cared for Ann Widdecombe they must then never allow this sickeningly barbaric assassination to be unsolved, subject of a blatant miscarriage of justice or merely kicked into the long grass like the tragic demise of Princess Diana.
Reform needs to start educating the public on how things like public sector pensions work.
Taxpayers are paying for them and should know exactly what they are voting for.
Reform should start printing and distributing its own fortnightly, free newspaper.
If every member delivered 100 papers, we would reach 27 million homes every fortnight.
Absolutely nothing will bring this man down.
For decades, he has stood tall against the establishment, weathered every attack and refused to be broken.
He is still standing. He is still fighting. And I have every faith that he will continue to do so.
If you want a government that serves the majority, all MPs must be elected with majority support.
Add a VETO option to the ballot that triggers a rerun if a majority of voters choose to VETO.
Prevent minority rule and maximise the common good.
Sign the petition to support:
So, we have a new PM.
Has there been a General Election then ?.. No. So, there is a new Labour Leader...did Labour members vote for him?.. No.
Isn't democracy wonderful! Regime change,
But no votes = DICTATORSHIP
HOLD A GENERAL ELECTION BURNHAM
🇬🇧 DAY 2 COMPLETE 🇬🇧
Today, the Court of Appeal heard from Philip Rule KC, James Tumbridge and the Chagossians' legal team.
This really is a David versus Goliath battle.
Earlier this year, the Chagossians won.
Instead of accepting that victory, the Labour Government chose to drag them back into court.
The Government may have an army of lawyers and King's Counsel funded by taxpayers' money, but the Chagossians have something far more powerful on their side:
Justice. Self-determination. The right to live in the homeland of their parents and grandparents.
The Chagossians overwhelmingly want their islands to remain British.
They overwhelmingly want the right to return home as British citizens.
Yet Labour continues to spend public money trying to defeat them in court.
How can a Government that claims to champion human rights deny the Chagossian people the most fundamental right of all – the right to determine their own future?
Tomorrow is the final day of the hearing.
We do not yet know whether the Court will deliver judgment immediately or reserve its decision for a later date, which could mean waiting weeks or even months.
Whatever happens, the Chagossians have shown extraordinary courage.
Tomorrow, the fight continues.
🇬🇧 Stand with the Chagossians.
🇬🇧 Stand for self-determination.
🇬🇧 Stand for British sovereignty.
#Chagos #Chagossians #SelfDetermination #BritishSovereignty #JusticeForChagossians
We did it! Today Hull City Council passed, with cross-party support and without opposition, a motion written by Reform UK Cllr Salman Anwar and presented by Cllr Duncan Graham to request that Hull be included in the National Grooming Gang Inquiry. My thanks go to all Reform UK Hull City Council councillors, and to all councillors who supported the motion. Congratulations also to those councillors who delivered their maiden speeches.
For victims and survivors in Hull, this is an important step towards getting answers, transparency, and the scrutiny they deserve, particularly around why Operations Marksman and Conference did not progress to CPS action.
@Hullccnews@reformparty_uk@MichelleDewbs
Keir Starmer will go down as the most tyrannical Prime Minister in UK history.
1. Attempted to cancel elections
2. Removed the right to trial by jury
3. Oversaw mothers imprisoned for years over facebook posts
4. He was about to implement Digital ID.
He should go to jail.
EVIL
I have submitted my application to stand for Reform at the next general election.
Ann Widdecombe.
Wayne Broadhurst.
Rhiannon Whyte.
Henry Nowak.
Thomas Roberts.
Lucy Lowe.
Terence Carney.
Victoria Agoglia.
Two-tier justice.
Record taxes.
Shabir Ahmed.
Mass welfare.
Islamism.
Sectarianism.
Non-crime hate incidents.
The Boriswave.
The ECHR.
Net Zero.
Fake Tories.
Chagos.
Keir Starmer.
Grooming gangs.
Open borders.
Your kids.
The future.
Britain is being destroyed. Your home is being destroyed.
And it is only going to get worse.
There is no such thing as a perfect party, or a perfect leader.
But Reform is heading in the right direction — back towards the light,
And away from all the managed decline you see around you today.
I urge you all to apply.
Before it’s too late.
Sentencing Without Consequence: The Brighton Case Exposes The State's Real Position
At Hove Crown Court on Wednesday, three men were sentenced for a gang rape on Brighton beach so calculated that the prosecutor described them as devoid of humanity. Ibrahim Alshafe and Abdulla Ahmadi were jailed for twenty one years each. Karin Al-Danasurt, who filmed the attack while encouraging it, received eighteen years and six months. All three will serve a further six years on licence.
The victim told the court what those numbers cannot capture. "They destroyed my life that night," she said. "No matter how hard I scrub it, I still feel dirty." She described watching Al-Danasurt film while the other two laughed at her.
One sentence in the reporting deserves more attention than it has received. The prosecution told the court to reach its sentencing decision without regard to the possibility that any of the three men might one day be deported. That is not a commentator's inference about how the asylum system functions. It is the Crown's own instruction to a judge, on the record, in a rape case. Even at the point of sentencing men convicted of an entirely predatory attack, the state cannot ask a court to assume they will ever leave the country.
I wrote in April, at the time of conviction, that the case exposed something larger than three individual men. All three had been housed in Home Office-approved hotel accommodation in Horsham. Two met on a small boat crossing from France. The government of the day was, on that same day, in Dunkirk signing a deal worth hundreds of millions of pounds and calling it a breakthrough. I argued then that the accommodation contracts, running years into the future, told a truer story than the press conference. You do not sign long-term housing arrangements for a problem you intend to solve.
Wednesday's sentencing hearing confirms that argument from an unexpected source. It was not made by a critic of the system. It was made by the prosecutor within it, cautioning a judge against assuming the machinery of removal would ever engage. If the Crown itself cannot rely on deportation as a live possibility in a case this severe, the claim that failed asylum seekers who commit serious crimes face meaningful consequences beyond prison collapses under its own evidence.
None of this diminishes what happened to one woman on a beach in October. It explains why the conditions that produced it remain in place. Men arrive by unauthorised routes, are housed by the state in ordinary communities, and the system built to assess and remove those with no right to remain operates so slowly and so unreliably that even its own prosecutors will not promise it works. The victim in this case will carry what was done to her for the rest of her life. The system that housed her attackers will carry no equivalent weight.
A state that cannot guarantee removal even after a rape conviction has not built a deterrent. It has built a waiting room. The public was told in April that the Dunkirk deal represented control. Wednesday's hearing suggests the opposite: that control was never really on offer, and that the government's own lawyers know it. Parliament should demand an account of how many convicted foreign offenders like these three are actually removed each year, and publish the answer before another beach, another woman, another verdict.
"Karin Al-Danasurt, who filmed the attack while encouraging it, received eighteen years and six months."
Wales Has Been Left Out of The National Inquiry. Today Gave Its New Labour Leader No Excuse Left
Gwent Police have charged eight men over alleged child sexual offences against children in South Wales, spanning 1985 to 1996.
Every one of these men is presumed innocent, and nothing in this piece changes that.
The names: Shafaq Mohammed, 58. Syed Mohammed Ashan Taqvi, 65. Mohammed Sheikh Abdul Hannan, 54. Kevin Lawrence, 54. Sheikh Mohammed Tahir Ullah, 73. Aminur Rahman Chowdhury, 58. Shakeel Babur, 58. Murad Ali, 57.
Newport, Abergavenny, Swansea, with prosecutors saying there are links further afield still being worked out. The case goes to court now.
Most people will scroll past this as just another historic case. They shouldn't, and here's why.
The alleged offending starts in 1985. The inquiry's own timeframe starts in 1996. That's eleven years of this case sitting outside the period the inquiry has agreed to look at, and it's happening in one of the first major prosecutions announced since the inquiry opened its doors.
And we've learned this the hard way, over and over, in town after town. Where there's one gang, there's usually many more. Oldham taught us that. Rotherham taught us that. Every single time one of these cases gets prosecuted, it turns out to be a single thread pulled from something far bigger that nobody wanted to look at directly. Eight men charged today doesn't mean eight men is the whole picture. It rarely is.
The years that matter in cases like this are never the last ones. They're the first ones. The moment a child said something to an adult and that adult decided what to do about it, or didn't. Whether that was a police officer, a social worker, a teacher, doesn't much matter. What matters is that none of it gets built in a year. It takes a decade to bed in. Sometimes two.
So if these charges hold up in court, whatever went wrong institutionally around the earliest victims in this case happened almost entirely in years the inquiry has already ruled outside its scope.
We were told this inquiry exists to drag institutional failure into daylight. Here's a case alleging exactly that kind of failure, starting eleven years before the inquiry's own clock. So which is it. Does the inquiry follow the failure back to where it actually started, or does it just inherit the case at the point its own paperwork happens to switch on.
Nobody's told us yet. That's the point.
The courts will decide guilt or innocence, and that's exactly where that decision belongs. But the inquiry has a separate question in front of it now, whether it wants it or not. You can't say you're examining institutional failure and then rule out the exact years that failure was forming.
There's someone new who needs to answer for that question now. Ken Skates was confirmed today as leader of Welsh Labour, unanimous backing, first day in the job proper after months as interim. He inherits a party reduced to eleven seats and third place in the Senedd, and he inherits this case landing on the same morning as his appointment. That's not a coincidence he gets to dodge.
So here's the question for the new leader of Welsh Labour, on day one.
Will you demand that the National Inquiry into Grooming Gangs treats Wales the same way it's being forced to treat Rotherham, Oldham, Telford and Bradford, or will you let Wales carry on being the case nobody in Westminster wants to say out loud.
If Skates wants to lead differently to Eluned Morgan, this is where that starts.
_________
Imagine the Prime Minister Under Oath
Imagine the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom dragged in front of a national inquiry into the cover-up of the Pakistani rape gangs, forced to testify under oath, forced to defend his own record.
You don't have to imagine it. You just need to help me make it happen.
For eight years I've exposed how politicians and police covered up the gang rape of working-class White girls by Pakistani rape gangs. With the people of Oldham behind me, I led the campaign that forced the national inquiry into existence. Now, with your help, we force that inquiry somewhere it does not want to go.
The Cover-Up of the Cover-Up
As Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham fronted a series of Assurance Reviews. One of them was in my hometown, Oldham. It buried the truth rather than exposed it. Don't take my word for it. Ask Maggie Oliver. She has reached the same conclusion.
We forced the national inquiry despite his efforts, not because of them. Burnham once defended the robustness of a review that has since been exposed as a cover-up. Now he is rewriting what he actually did.
Why This Matters Before It's Too Late
Right now, the national inquiry will not investigate Burnham or his conduct. His deceit is set to go unchallenged. We intend to change that before the inquiry reaches Oldham.
Once Burnham is in Downing Street, the pressure to protect him will be immense. The institutions that failed these girls will do everything they can to avoid holding a prime minister to account. Much of the press will look away, as it always has. So it falls to us to carry the truth where they won't.
What This Community Becomes
This is why I'm turning this readership into something I can no longer run on my own. Red Wall and the Rabble needs to grow into a proper independent investigative outlet.
Before Burnham reaches Number 10, Red Wall and the Rabble needs 2,000 more paid subscribers. That's the scale of what's coming. But today, we only need two.
Sign Up Here
👉 https://t.co/mZBZnScays
Should we succeed, politicians will go to prison. It is as simple as that. Surely, on this prospect alone, it is worth your support.
News🇬🇧⚡️: Confirmed - Ann Widdecombe Politically Target - Today head of the Counter Terrorist Squad, Laurence Taylor confirms the murder of Ann Widdecombe as a planned political assassination, SIX days after the discovery of her body in a pool of blood with severe head injuries.
Despite the DEI centric Devon and Cornwall Police Chief Constables, James Vaughan and equally hapless Assistant Matt Longmann's constant protestations, that Ann's murder was neither political or an act of terrorism, here we are 6 days later.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) must surely now look at the communications and attempted skewing of public information, negatating legitimate lines of enquiry and virtual threats not to 'speculation' espoused by Devon and Cornwall Police Service?
Any attempt to deliberately or inadvertently downplay the focus of this investigation away from the obvious that Ann was the target of a 'political assassination' was dangerous, unprofessional, damaging and misplaced when seeking justice for Ann.
Source: @GBNEWS.
One Man's Terrorist: The £123 Million Grift of Dale Vince
Dale Vince donated £6 million to the Labour Party. His companies received £123 million in government grants. Do the maths.
Two days after Hamas murdered, raped and kidnapped Israelis on October 7, Dale Vince went on Times Radio and called them "freedom fighters." His exact words: "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." Angela Rayner called it "appalling." He sued Richard Tice for saying he supported Hamas. He lost.
This is the man who bought British energy policy.
He left school at fifteen with no qualifications. Became a New Age traveller living in vans. Then discovered the real con: green energy. Founded Ecotricity in 1996 with an undisclosed bank loan. Now worth £107 million. His secret? You pay for it.
£123 million in government grants in one year. £3.55 million in City Hall contracts from Sadiq Khan. While he donated £6 million to Labour. His ex-wife claimed in court he gave away £5.4 million to the party to hide assets from her. The divorce settlement cost him £40 million thirty years after they split. He called it "character assassination." The character was already dead.
But the real masterpiece is the pivot.
After making his fortune on net zero hysteria, after taking £123 million in grants for "green energy," Dale Vince now says heat pumps were "mis-sold." Says net zero is "toxic." Says Ed Miliband's department should be broken up. Says the term "net zero" should be scrapped. Calls Miliband "unfit to be Chancellor" and says he lacks "grasp of basic value for money."
This from a man whose own net zero airline collapsed in January 2026 before flying a single passenger. Ecojet. Liquidated. £20 million funding failed. Another green vanity project that left nothing but invoices.
He wants to pull up the ladder now that he's rich. The ideology served its purpose. The grants cleared. The £6 million bought the access he claims he wasn't buying. Now the script changes.
At his football club, Forest Green Rovers, he flies the Palestinian flag. Giant flag at Ecotricity HQ. He refuses to remove them. Compares Palestine to Ukraine. Says Israelis shouldn't feel threatened by the flag. This after his "freedom fighter" comments. After claiming Netanyahu "wants antisemitism to be a thing." After the Bondi Beach massacre comments linking terrorism to Israel.
He is not a businessman. He is not an environmentalist. He is a political investor with returns that would embarrass a hedge fund. Donate £6 million. Receive £123 million. A 2,000% return dressed in hemp.
Dale Vince is the proof that the green movement was never about the climate. It was about the money. The grants. The subsidies. The contracts. The ideology was the sales pitch. The hysteria was the business model. And now that the money is made, the mask slips. Heat pumps don't work. Net zero is toxic. The department he funded should be scrapped.
Keep the Palestinian flag flying, Dale. Keep explaining why Hamas are freedom fighters. Keep cashing those cheques while the grid fails and the bills rise. The working class you lecture about sacrifice are freezing. You are in your hill fort. The con is complete.
You are not the future. You are the past that got paid.
An Open Letter to the Fabian Society
Remember this window? April 20, 2006. Tony Blair stands beside your stained glass, smiling that smile. The Fabian window unveiled. Shaw, Webb, Wells, Pease. Your founding gradualists captured in light, "remoulding the world nearer to the heart's desire." You thought you had won. Your most successful project. The template perfected. The Fabian who could win elections while losing the argument. The manager of decline with a human face.
You almost got there, didn't you? After 140 years of creeping. Of infiltrating. Of "reformist effort" and quiet subversion behind oak panels. You put your main card on the table expecting the final takeover. The culmination of generations of patient entryism.
And you chose Keir.
Keir Starmer. Your prize possession. The Fabian before he was an MP. The executive committee member. The total dedication to your founders, your methods, your gradualist gospel. The man who would complete what Blair started. The perfect Fabian specimen.
Big mistake.
Look at him. The same smile. The same emptiness. The same void where conviction should be. Keir is not your triumph. He is your exposure. The blueprint of your reign laid bare for all to see. The manager of decline. The administrator of mediocrity. The human embodiment of your society's true nature: power without purpose, control without vision, rule by spreadsheet and focus group.
You thought he would be Attlee. He is MacDonald without the drama. Blair without the charisma. You thought he would mask your agenda in competence. Instead he has revealed it. The Fabian method exposed: not liberation, but management. Not progress, but process. Not a new world, but a slower death.
Your prize possession leads Britain to its demise, alright. But not your planned demise. The sudden collapse into ridicule. The exposure of your emptiness. The revelation that behind the stained glass and the tortoise symbolism, there is nothing. No vision. No soul. Just Keir. Just the void. The same smile as Blair, twenty years later, with nothing learned.
Two years. That is what you have left. Two years of Labour wearing your costume, demonstrating exactly what Fabianism produces. Then the costume comes off. Then the game ends. Then both the Fabian Society and the Labour Party join your beloved Ramsay MacDonald in the history books.
The tortoise is tired. The hare is awake. And your gradualism has run out of time.
Keep your window. Keep your tortoise. Keep your Keir.
We see you now.
The Free Speech Union will challenge any public body that tries to silence legitimate criticism of Islam through a backdoor anti-Islamic blasphemy law.
We were successful in getting South Wales Police to drop its sinister and censorious bespoke “anti-Muslim hostility” guidance, which instructed officers to record any incident they deemed to go beyond “legitimate” discussion of Islam, after we threatened the force with legal action.
The Free Speech Union hopes this serves as a warning to other police forces and public bodies across the country that we will challenge any attempt to impose a backdoor Islamic blasphemy law. We are aware that West Yorkshire Police is in the process of rolling out anti-Muslim hostility guidance, and the Nursing and Midwifery Council has already adopted it.
Speaking at ARC, the General Secretary of the Free Speech Union spoke about the global assault on free speech. He told GB News’s Will Kingston: “I think the assault on free speech, particularly online, is a global phenomenon, and seems to be particularly true of the English-speaking countries, Commonwealth countries, and the United States.
“There are lots of different reasons for it. But I think fundamentally, since the ebbing away of the Christian tide, we have a new religion occupying the public square, a new public morality, and it is the woke radical progressive ideology we’re all familiar with.”
Read more below 👇
What the Grooming Gangs National Inquiry Didn't Want You Looking At
A statutory inquiry had one legal obligation on 13 July. Instead, it filled its website with everything except the one document it was supposed to publish.
On the day of its first deadline, the £65 million inquiry launched a webform, an empty hub, and a hearing room that shuts out survivors.
Yesterday, 13 July 2026, was supposed to be a significant day for the Statutory Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs. It was the day, according to the Inquiry's own Terms of Reference, that they were legally required to publish the criteria for selecting investigation areas.
They didn't do it. The deadline passed without a word about the criteria.
Read my latest here;
https://t.co/ojkVDJ0ySc
_________
Eight Years Later
We are not where we are by accident. Every column inch, every FOI, every hearing forced into existence, came from years of refusing to stop. From paying a price that most would not.
We will not get where we need to be if we leave the job to the people who built the cover-up in the first place. Stand with me.
This work is free because the truth has to circulate. Anyone can read it, share it, act on it, without paying a penny. But truth without numbers is easy to crush.
Governments do not fear facts. Facts get filed, minimised, managed. What governments fear is scale.
Burnham and the Labour Party do not fear one campaigner. They fear thousands of readers, sharing the same work, backing the same investigation, because numbers mean witnesses, numbers mean pressure, numbers mean consequences they cannot manage away.
Every subscriber is a number they cannot erase. Every reader widens a circle they cannot control. A handful of supporters can be dismissed as noise. Thousands cannot. This is how the campaign survives. This is how we see it through to the end. This is how voices like ours stop being managed and start being feared.
Before Burnham reaches Number 10, Red Wall and the Rabble needs 2,000 more paid subscribers. That's the scale of what's coming. But today, we only need two.
Sign Up Now. Help force Andy Burnham testify at the National Inquiry.
https://t.co/mZBZnScays
Raja Miah MBE
https://t.co/ojkVDJ0ySc
The Zealot Discovers Pragmatism the Moment It Suits Him
Ed Miliband called new North Sea drilling "climate vandalism." He built a year in office on that conviction, closing licences, missing his own department's cost-benefit deadlines, and standing at the despatch box to warn that Britain's exposure to global fossil fuel prices was a danger to households. Now, with a possible move to Number 11 on the table, he is privately signalling he will approve production at the Jackdaw gas field. The vandalism argument has not changed. His career prospects have.
An industry source put the real motive plainly: Miliband sees approval as a way of showing willing to the City. Not to the 1.4 million households Jackdaw could heat this winter. Not to the union boss who warned his appointment as chancellor would strangle job creation. To the markets, whose confidence he now needs more than he needs his own principles to survive intact. Conviction, it turns out, was never the obstacle to drilling. Ambition was the only thing capable of overriding it.
Look at what has changed in the meantime, and what has not. Energy bills are 13 per cent higher than in April. Wealthy residents are drawing up exit plans over fears of a new CGT regime he may soon be responsible for setting. Britain still imports gas at a premium while sitting on fields it refuses to develop. None of that moved him while he held only the energy brief. What moved him was the prospect of a bigger one, and with it, a market reaction he could not afford to mishandle.
Even the manner of this conversion tells its own story. He cannot confirm the decision publicly until a consultation closes on 10 August, for fear of triggering a judicial review, the same legal machinery that campaigners used to strangle Jackdaw's original 2022 consent in the first place. So the U-turn arrives privately, filtered through unnamed sources, calibrated for maximum reassurance to investors and minimum political exposure to a Left flank that still believes he means what he has spent years saying. A minister discovering pragmatism only where nobody can hold him to it in public is not pragmatism. It is management.
The Aberdeen South by-election should have been the wake-up call. Voters handed the Tories victory on the back of exactly this argument, that domestic energy production matters more than distant targets. It made no visible difference to his convictions until his own ambitions entered the equation. That timing tells you everything you need to know.
None of this should be mistaken for a change of heart on net zero itself. Miliband has not renounced the target that has driven a year of closures, suppressed analysis and rising bills. He has simply found one exception, sized precisely to the moment his own career required it. The zealotry stays intact everywhere his ambition does not reach.
Andrew Neil called this government's energy policy bordering on criminally negligent. He might have added that the man responsible for it has just demonstrated exactly how negligence gets corrected, not by admitting the policy was wrong, but by discovering, at the moment it becomes personally useful, that it was.
Britain does not need a chancellor who abandons conviction under market pressure. It needs one who never mistook ideology for policy in the first place. Miliband has shown he is capable of neither, only of noticing, at exactly the right moment for himself, which one currently pays better.
"An industry source put the real motive plainly: Miliband sees approval as a way of showing willing to the City. Not to the 1.4 million households Jackdaw could heat this winter."