@TeamYouTube This also isn’t the only problematic video on his channel. I made another tweet about another video of his. He’s a repeat offender & doesn’t care about the platforms safety whatsoever
https://t.co/ZRo0evuvsi At 10:17 of this video, the creator shows poorly censored furry porn. @TeamYouTube Despite my reports on the app, nothing has been done. An age restriction isn’t enough for this video as you can clearly see the sexual details. Please respond
@TeamYouTube Reports were made in the past and action wasn’t taken which is why I reached out. It’s very blatanly clear just by going to the timestamp that more action should be taken. The videos been age restricted for a long time yet people can still see furry porn if they watch it.
@TeamYouTube This youtuber named Entity needs to be banned. In a video he posted, he displayed extortion images of a guy named Grant, and also leaked his address in the video. Entity admitted to being the one who extorted him in the video. https://t.co/8Agk0wWedn
@TeamYouTube can I get a response? all I wanna do is just make content for my audience but with all these complicated things to consider it's driving me away from the platform
@TeamYouTube Why are my videos posted in 2025, 24, 23, and 22 completely hidden under restricted mode? This update you guys had in August really affected me as a creator. I’d like a dm conversation with a human youtube rep. Channel is EpicM1.
@TeamYouTube It's not my viewing experience that's the issue. Viewers aren't coming across my content I'm literally losing subscribers because ALL of my videos are hidden on restricted mode which is default for many people. How am I gonna tell them to turn it off if I cant even reach em??
@TeamYouTube most of the time when i send appeals through the youtube system it is rejected within minutes when my videos have length to them, this took a few hours but how can I trust thoughtful review was put into that? if we cant work this out what about the one I got a warning for?
@TeamYouTube https://t.co/HgLbA7BUjS the video in the drive serves as a message to you regarding my recent strike, please hear it out. this is the striked video: https://t.co/eJ1Zm1lvv7
@TeamYouTube Yesterday I posted a video which got limited ads, so I removed it and ran it through editing to remove anything in violation of ad friendly guides. It's still getting demonetized. I put so much focus in making this video compliant with ad, and community guidelines.
@TeamYouTube My video falls well within the "Moderate profanity like “bitch”, “douchebag”, "asshole", and “shit” used frequently in the video." section of what is considered advertiser friendly, is that all of a sudden a problem now? I'm very confused.
@TeamYouTube This is really making me question, are you guys really taking my word into consideration? What “thourough” review was done in the past 2 weeks for you to come to the same conclusion you did 2 minutes after my first appeal?
@TeamYouTube Earlier this morning my most recent video was striked. In the email I recieved, you mentioned a scene as the reason. I was striked for a very similar reason to that scene before. It was a mistake, but I believe a strike is still unnecessary. Please reach back out.
@TeamYouTube https://t.co/gbq4sgTNq0 Here is the video in question. The scene in the email was at 8:17. This was written as "sexual and nudity". None of that is in the video. The scene is questionable, but I can assure you nobody had issuesand it was a simple mistake. A strike is not needed.