@FairyJack2 You’re describing a different parent post, which is why this isn’t part of that discussion. In the other case, the metadata ties my reply to that thread. That’s the distinction you keep missing.
@krassenstein You’re assigning political blame that isn’t supported by the article. The outbreak came from Mexico, APHIS detected it, and Canada’s restriction is a standard biosecurity step. The outbreak originated in Mexico in 2024, and APHIS is actively responding.
https://t.co/960Hm3zqIg
@FairyJack2 You’re repeating the same error. X’s metadata defines the chain, not profile browsing. My reply was same‑day and tagged as replying to you, which places it in this conversation.
@FairyJack2 You’re arguing from a hypothetical that has nothing to do with what happened. My reply was posted the same day, and X’s metadata shows it was a direct reply to you. That’s the record.
You’re describing profile browsing. X defines threads by metadata, and mine points to you.
What actually determines the thread.
The thread is determined by the metadata X attaches to my reply, specifically:
“Replying to @FairyJack2”
That line is not decorative. It is the platform’s authoritative record of the reply chain.
Screenshots don’t override it. Profile browsing doesn’t override it. Your personal interpretation doesn’t override it.
@FairyJack2 Thread structure is defined by X’s metadata, not by browsing someone’s profile. My reply is tagged as replying to you, which establishes the chain.
@claudeddaniel@StopTrump2025@EdKrassen@WhiteHouse My post was about sourcing and timing. Your ‘MAGA paid account’ line doesn’t address anything I wrote.
So Brian doesn’t have a paid account either? What exactly is your point, if you even have one?
The thread is defined by X’s metadata, not by your screenshot. My post shows ‘Replying to @FairyJack2.’ That’s the parent. Your image doesn’t override the platform’s record.
You haven’t changed a bit, still fixated on the same thing. Keep banging your head against the wall if you want, I’m enjoying watching you sNext ng, you’ll be turning to Grok for help.
Next thing, you will go to grok for help.
@StopTrump2025@EdKrassen@WhiteHouse I acknowledged the link. But the article is still nothing but rumors dressed up as reporting. That’s what was called out, and that part hasn’t changed.
@PramilaJayapal Gas is $3.64 where I live. If you’re claiming a 50% nationwide increase, you’ll need to show the data. Washington and California aren’t the national baseline.
@krassenstein You keep trying to turn a couple of out‑of‑context lines into a personality diagnosis. If you have an actual point beyond selective quoting, present it. Otherwise this is just another performative narrative you’re building for your followers.
@FairyJack2 The parent tweet is right there in the chain. You cropped it out and then acted like that changes the thread. It doesn’t. X shows the continuity, your screenshot doesn’t override that.
I replied directly to your comment. X shows that clearly. This is the same thread, address the point.
The factual reality is simple
I replied to you post. You replied back. That means we’re in the same thread.
There is no “different thread” unless the parent tweet is different, and it isn’t.