UPDATE—ICE refuses to release body of man shot in Houston to his family.
Agents stripped him of any form of ID after they shot him—then classified him as "John Doe."
ICE is demanding family submit biometric info to confirm identity.
"He deserves a proper funeral," said lawyer.
Lawyer interview statement starts at 30 seconds into video clip.
"They haven't made it easy—they have made it very, very difficult."
"We are demanding the release of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo's body."
Lidia Terrazas News doesn't have an account on this platform—so posting first full length and credited video here to help raise awareness.
"Members of the group Patriot Front ride the metro as a commuter looks on, during the 250th anniversary of U.S. independence in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 4, 2026. REUTERS/Cheney Orr"
Honestly, the Jayleb Brown slander is kinda crazy. Brown balled out to bring the Celts to a second seed.
Proved he can be a number 1 option when Tatum was down.
He is one of the smartest people in the league.
And still this disrespected.
I hope he rips thought the league
The Jaylen Brown propaganda in the last 24 hours:
— Anonymous GM doesn’t view him as a top-50 player.
— Trail Blazers viewed him as a net-negative player.
— Was called a 'disease' for 'being the smartest in the room.'
— Reportedly wouldn’t go back to being the No. 2 option when Tatum returned due to his ego.
— Believed to have gone 'off-script' in Round 1 when up 3-1 versus the Sixers.
This is getting outta hand. 🤦♂️
🚨BREAKING: A new video shows DHS lied, again, about an ICE shooting.
Yesterday, ICE reportedly told police that a man “weaponized” his vehicle by “ramming” into an ICE sedan, forcing an agent to fire his gun during an operation in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Except… that’s not what the video shows.
In the video, an ICE agent rushes the driver’s window with his gun drawn. The agent recklessly waves his gun around, and appears to order the driver to roll down the window.
That’s an extreme use of force from the very beginning.
Another agent approaches the car, and moments later, they violently smash the driver’s window.
And notice how the driver doesn’t try to flee until ICE violently escalates everything.
He drives around the ICE vehicle, makes it into the street… not hitting a single ICE agent, or vehicle.
Then, AFTER the car is already past every agent, and driving away, an ICE agent opens fire.
The law is pretty clear… officers may only use deadly force, against a fleeing person, if they have probable cause to believe that person poses an immediate threat of death, or serious physical injury to the officer, or others.
So, where was the immediate threat?
The car had already passed the agents… and was driving AWAY.
ICE also claimed Lara-Hernandez had a criminal history of assault, and that this was a targeted enforcement operation.
Yet, publicly available court records reportedly do not show any active warrants.
Federal agents don’t get to point guns at people without legal justification. They don’t get to fire at a vehicle after the immediate threat has passed. And they don’t get to lie to police about what happened.
So, when are we going to start holding these agents accountable?
🚨WHAT ON EARTH?!!!
Over 100 Flock cameras that were set to "go dark" at the end of June after city council voted to shut them down...
...have bizarrely just REMAINED ON and the police are still using them
On June 17, the city council's safety committee voted to END the contract because when they asked police to prove these cameras actually reduce crime, the police could point to only 3 cases that led to convictions.
So the city council let the contract expire on June 29th, but then people noticed the cameras were still up...
...because Flock VOLUNTEERED to keep running them for FREE while the city "figures it out."
In fact, police confirmed they are still running them to "keep the community safe" and the company agreed to keep the system live, despite the contract expiring.
It gets worse.
When reporters asked simple questions like... is data still being collected? Do the cameras shut off or keep recording? Who can access what was already stored? It turned out that neither the city NOR Flock would answer.
So just to recap:
The contract is expired.
The elected body said no.
Nobody re-authorized it.
Flock won't say what it's doing with the data.
...but the cameras are STILL ON and being used by police