Esquire 🔫

The universe rewards those who see what hasn't happened yet. @PolyGun_

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

Shout out to the the lead trader and the copytrade @polygun_ for this 6X win. Have never paid attention to basketball but its awesome to catch action like this.

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@QuantumMinted @Polygun_ Sent

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

Shout out to the the lead trader and the copytrade @polygun_ for this 6X win. Have never paid attention to basketball but its awesome to catch action like this.

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@fayecalls @Polymarket @PolymarketTrade https://t.co/B1FRBdBDWA polymarket dropped the ball in an instrumental manner here IMO

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@j0xnah Appreciate you be one of the few PM influencers to recognize thatcontreversy this large doesn't arise without a serious underlying problem. 99% of the PM badges are just adding fuel to the fire claiming "got you idiots". Glad to see some hearts in the market.

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@joostienXD @Polymarket So does the Volume change the ethics of the situation, or why is that relevant?

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@willo2_Poly I agree that throwing salt in the wound by having them bragging isn't helping the situation.

[willo2 @willo2_Poly]

Good morning guys.

If you keep a market open for trading, you should accept evidence that comes out within that timeframe.

If my trades were valid,
The legally issued proof from MSTR should be as well.

Otherwise you're scamming users.

Do the right thing Polymarket

[Λ R C Λ N Ξ @ArcanePrivacy]

Privacy by default.

https://t.co/NFgqV0HWfa

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@0xd1namit I agree with this!

https://t.co/rMMmlOspBX

[Polymarket Money @PolymarketMoney]

$MSTR sold 32 Bitcoin for ~$2.5M last week.

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@Jeremybtc You cant make this shit up, polymarket posted that it was a week ago on june 1st.
https://t.co/rMMmlOspBX

[Polymarket Money @PolymarketMoney]

$MSTR sold 32 Bitcoin for ~$2.5M last week.

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@0xDinoCrypto @shayne_coplan @Polymarket @ICE_Markets @NYSE Bro you can't make this shit up

https://t.co/rMMmlOspBX

[Polymarket Money @PolymarketMoney]

$MSTR sold 32 Bitcoin for ~$2.5M last week.

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@Jeremybtc Slamm it!!!!

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@CarOnPolymarket This is likely one of the most uneducated opinions I have ever heard. Prediction Markets should facilitate a layer of truth.

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@Motoswap In agreement here, Sui had a ton of momentum. The foundation should have had the Cetus contracts audit 100 times before they put so much on their back. The dex becomes the home for the real users. Compelling read.

[Motoswap @Motoswap]

https://t.co/7teirtoDGh

[Ran Neuner @cryptomanran]

Hey @Polymarket , do the right thing here.

[Esquire 🔫 @Esquire_Intel]

@0xDinoCrypto Much love brother, need to do what is right!

[0xDinosaur @0xDinoCrypto]

Let’s cut through the noise.

If you ask today, “Did MSTR sell Bitcoin before May 31?” the honest answer is yes. Nobody serious would say no.

That is what the market asked. It did not ask whether MSTR disclosed the sale before May 31. It asked whether MSTR sold any Bitcoin before May 31.

People who traded this market knew how MSTR reporting works. Everyone watching STRC, MSTR, and SEC filings knew the 8-K would likely come on the next business day. That means any sale between May 26 and May 31 could only be confirmed after May 31. This was obvious to serious traders.

So if Polymarket’s position is “anything confirmed after May 31 does not count,” then the market became impossible for YES after May 26. Unless Michael Saylor randomly shouted “we sold Bitcoin” before midnight, YES could never be proven under that logic.

But the market did not close on May 31. Everyone waited for the filing. Then the filing came out and confirmed what YES buyers were betting on: MSTR sold Bitcoin before May 31.

The NO argument does not come from the title. It does not come from the main rule. It does not come from the actual event. It only survives because Polymarket added an interpretation that turns “sold by May 31” into “disclosed by May 31.”

I have spoken with legal advisors, including top-level counsel in Asia. If this resolves NO, I believe affected users have a serious path to challenge it, including collective legal action.

The rule said sells.

MSTR sold.

That should be the end of it.
@Polymarket

[0xDinosaur @0xDinoCrypto]

I have formally delivered a legal demand letter, prepared with legal advisors and counsel, to Adventure One QSS Inc. d/b/a Polymarket, the Panama-incorporated entity publicly identified with Polymarket’s international platform.

This matter will be pursued under applicable Panamanian law and other relevant jurisdictions.

The rule said “sells,” not “discloses.”

I will continue pursuing every lawful path available until this receives a fair review.

[willo2 @willo2_Poly]

I was just scammed for $500K by Polymarket.

I am "willo2", the top holder of YES on "MicroStrategy sells Bitcoin by May 31st".

Here's what happened:

[0xDinosaur @0xDinoCrypto]

I am prepared to hold @Polymarket legally accountable if this market ignores its written rules.

I am offering a $10,000 bounty for the best lawyer/legal team to help challenge this resolution.

Prediction markets cannot invent disclosure-timing rules after the fact.