@Yanw62190003@zlj517 I'm afraid, you are proving yourself retarded. It's simple. It's not mineral water to be sold in super markets. e.g. industrial water is discharged to river/ocean after being processed to minimize the impact to the environment. But not processed for drinking purpose. Same logic.
@LinMI7362@kkng18@Yanw62190003@zlj517 I can feel you. All these Drink it chants are nth but a clear evidence of how immature the public opinion in #GreatChina is. You're shaming yourselves in public. Socrates talked about Wisdom of ignorance. Question info around you and you'll see a broader horizon outside china ;)
@rong_peter@zlj517 I'm so sorry, I have to give you an F. You're not aligned in the course of this discussion.
And unfortunately no one gives a shit about your subjective impression 🤣
Apart from that, I can give you a Like on you very last point <3 We'll see ;)
@kkng18@Yanw62190003@zlj517 You can submit a quantitative report on the enviromental effect between your solution and IAEA proven solution ;) Please discuss with a context of #carbonneutral policy. (Max 280 characters)
@rong_peter@zlj517 You have good eyes, almost there. Congrats ;)
That's how Chinese gov scatters #propaganda to evade worldwide accusation to China's downplay with #WuhanVirus at the early stage by conjuring up & exaggerating a "problem", which is not so based on IAEA's criteria.
Be open minded ;)
@SpokespersonCHN It clearly alludes how China is failing to embrace Xinjiang region in a peaceful and democratic manner as much as there's the need to forge a #Propaganda movie. Look forward to another one featuring Hong Kong and Taiwan ;)
@Jimxu55234336@Yanw62190003@zlj517 There's already an answer in one of my posts to your fellow stupid friends. I bet you're not capable of reading books. LOL
@Jimxu55234336@Yanw62190003@zlj517 You're looping the discussion despite my kind suggestion. What an idiot. I'm enjoying how innocent chinese ppl can be easily brainwashed by their government. No wonder they obsessionally believes Taiwan is a part of PRC.
@Jimxu55234336@Yanw62190003@zlj517 Can't you tell even the difference with metaphor? LOL Btw it's not my PM and he is a Minister of Finance in the first place. Learn how manipulation works by mass media. It's targeting the stupid. Start trying to be objective. You can do it ;) #Medialiteracy
@Yanw62190003@zlj517 I'm afraid, you are proving yourself retarded. It's simple. It's not mineral water to be sold in super markets. e.g. industrial water is discharged to river/ocean after being processed to minimize the impact to the environment. But not processed for drinking purpose. Same logic.
@zlj517 < Fun fact >
It turned out that Lijian Zhao has blocked me (what a coward, LOL), which means there're undesirable facts for chinese government. You can find them out by yourself ;)
@zlj517 The water is PROCESSED by ALPS down to 1500 Bq/L, which is less than 1/6 of the safety criteria defined by WHO. In civilized countries there's transparency in data as well as objective&quantitative discussion based on science. You should learn from Japan. #ChinaPoliticalTerrorist
@He0512Xin@zlj517 I'm not hiding my attitude. I'm cosistent in this disucssion. LOL. Whichever is its origine their modes of decay, the effects of the radiation, the range of half-lives, etc. are indistinguishable. Both are evaluated with the same units [Bq] or [Sv].
@He0512Xin@zlj517 Thx for providing another proof of your stupidity. Water circulates through river, ocean, rain and evaporation. Wherever it's discharged, eventually it's the same thing. You should know that radioactive substance is everywhere. It's just a matter of relativity kid.
@He0512Xin@zlj517 Can't you make a difference with metaphor? Given the industrial water is said to be safely processed, would you like to drink it? Maybe Japanese officials may drink it for a demonstration, but it's not for mass consumption.
@He0512Xin@zlj517 I'm afraid, you are proving your self retarded. It's simple. It's not mineral water to be sold in super markets. e.g. industrial water is discharged to river/ocean after being processed to minimize the impact to the environment. But not processed for drinking purpose. Same logic.
@rong_peter@zlj517 Try search #六四天安門事件#文化大革命 to assess China's transparency. You should care of yourselves first. The guy in front of the tank was alive, but it was taken in the coming day. It was to fraudly make an image that gov didn't kill citizens. You see how you are manipulated?