@eteyen.right

[@eteyen.right @EteyenRight]

@pablofindsout But that's your father's friend ex. Isn't that look so weird?

[@eteyen.right @EteyenRight]

https://t.co/87NnMxmgNP

[@eteyen.right @EteyenRight]

@AWeissmann_ Jack Smith is not deranged. The problem is that you are daring to do things others won't do and you do it with impunity.

[Rick Wilson @TheRickWilson]

God, I hope no one photoshops this. That would be so wrong.

[@eteyen.right @EteyenRight]

@anuforo @fkeyamo I was expecting Festus Keyamu to be at the tribunal to defend Tinubu about the fake certificate and fake NYSC discharge certificate. Where was he? This man thinks Nigerian youths are still as dumb as the ruling elit think them to be. Unfortunately, we are behind that era.

[@eteyen.right @EteyenRight]

@fkeyamo Answer this first: Where did you get moneynto buy a house cash in America?

[theo grace @theogrofficial]

From your heart to the finger.❤️

[The Last Word @TheLastWord]

Russian general says he was fired for telling the truth about war in Ukraine https://t.co/aj5r5asg5W

[The Lincoln Project @ProjectLincoln]

"Putin thought our unity would shatter at the first testing. He thought democratic leaders would be weak. He thought wrong. I mean that, our commitment to Ukraine will not weaken. We will stand for liberty and freedom today, tomorrow, and for as long as it takes.” - @POTUS

[Vice President Kamala Harris Archived @VP46Archive]

Doug and I were honored to host the first Eid celebration at the Vice President’s Residence. To all those who celebrate, we hope you had a blessed Eid al-Adha!

[Laurence Tribe 🇺🇦 ⚖️ @tribelaw]

Exactly right: Justice Jackson’s dissents will someday be the law
https://t.co/iclK9XylRF

[@eteyen.right @EteyenRight]

@incredibledude9 @fkeyamo Why can't you just suspend your Twitter account, at least for knowing the truth that Tinubu did not win the election.

[Just Jack @7Veritas4]

For those who did, expect us soon.

#SummerOfJustice

[@eteyen.right @EteyenRight]

https://t.co/IqDMreAWYK

[Brian Allen @allenanalysis]

This was the opening to oral arguments heard on the case.

[Brian Allen @allenanalysis]

The Supreme Court ALLEGEDLY violated Article III of the Constitution by deciding a case based on hypotheticals and a fabricated name. This goes against the principle that the Court's jurisdiction is limited to actual cases and controversies.

MY THOUGHTS ARE 💭:

Before you hear this story it's important you understand the powers of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court's authority is confined to resolving real and specific legal disputes. Article III of the U.S. Constitution establishes the judicial power of federal courts, emphasizing the need for actual cases and controversies. The Court does not issue advisory opinions or decide hypothetical or abstract legal questions. The requirement of a genuine case or controversy ensures that the Court's decisions have a practical impact on the rights and interests of the involved parties, allowing for concrete resolution of legal disputes.

THE ISSUE AT HAND:

Stewart, a web designer based in Portland, Oregon, was surprised to receive a text from a reporter informing him that a request he supposedly made in 2016 was now part of a case before the U.S. Supreme Court. The request involved hiring a Colorado artist to create designs and possibly a website for his same-sex wedding. However, Stewart, who has been married to a woman for 15 years, is not gay. He is an advocate for LGBTQ rights and found it frustrating to see his name being used in this context.

CONTEXT:

The Supreme Court recently ruled 6-to-3 in favor of a Christian graphic artist, Lorie Smith, who argued that her freedom of speech allowed her to refuse designing wedding websites for same-sex couples. Smith's case was initially filed in 2016 in a Colorado district court, where she claimed that the state's anti-discrimination law violated her rights by prohibiting her from stating on her company's webpage that she would not create wedding websites for gay couples.

In the court documents, Smith's lawyers referred to a query they attributed to an individual named Stewart, matching the contact information of the person interviewed by The Washington Post. The message supposedly requested Smith's services for Stewart's upcoming wedding to someone named "Mike." The inclusion of this message played a role in the case's proceedings.

[@eteyen.right @EteyenRight]

@aholagunju @officialABAT You are illegitimate. You rigged to be there. You have no business in Aso rock. Wait till the Tribunal decides.