It's becoming clear that @yieldbasis is the catalyst that will supercharge the whole @CurveFinance ecosystem.
Volatile pools working hand in hand with stableswap pools. Love to see theory playing out in practice.
We investigated how much volume YieldBasis generates for Curve.
We found:
- Every $1 traded on YieldBasis generates at least $1.089 volume on Curve
- >88% of this volume was due to crvUSD swaps
- YieldBasis has a disproportionate impact in increasing Curve’s market share
Top stablecoin swaps experience quite a diversity now, with @protocol_fx bubbling up.
Indeed, soon it might be not USDC/USDT duopoly but a more decentralized landscape
Are you kidding me? We are on week 3 of GETTING PAID TO BORROW $crvUSD against $fxSAVE on @CurveFinance llamalend.
Deposit fxSAVE and borrow crvUSD here: https://t.co/fdEIxKMcWF
@protocol_fx has 55,357 ETH earning 2.6% staking reward plus 0.12% on @aave - $6.27m p/a on top of trading fees.
Once fxUSD reaches $250m in circulation, 37.5% of this yield would be distributed as revenue to veFXN. Today that's $8.63 per token, but by then it will be much more!
More fees for veFXN 👀
FIP-17 is live: https://t.co/Xz29a8r2NN
Currently, 100% of wstETH staking yield from $ETH xPOSITIONs flows to the Stability Pool.
We propose a milestone-based redistribution as fxUSD scales:
✔️ At $250M issuance → 50% to Stability Pool / 50% to Treasury
• 75% of Treasury share → veFXN holders
• 25% → protocol reserves & ops
✔️ At $500M issuance → 100% to Treasury (same split as above)
We’re confident this proposal strengthens protocol economics by giving veFXN sustainable cash flows, while keeping $fxSAVE yields attractive for LPs.
Read more on the forum 👇 https://t.co/Xz29a8r2NN