@NathanielA198@AshhNeo@jmutrades@FFNFunding Glad to hear it! We reversed the breach and approved the payout, everything gets buried in X lol. No one should be punished for utilizing the risk tools.
Youโre entitled to dislike the program. My point is that it's extremely lazy to misstate how the program works, and then dodge every correction by listing something else about the program you don't like.
For the third time: when a trader hits the MLL, we pay out the profits remaining in the account. How is that (combined with the fact that the trailing mechanism doesn't start until the trader requests the first payout) a negative in any way?
Yeah so where does it say anything about the next trade after the payout? The rule is pretty clear on the buffer in your screenshot.
Since we announced the new live program, we have rejected 0 live transitions. You have to be really terrible or clearly gambling to get rejected. Again, do your thing and take 10% of the story and complain publicly.
I don't care if you like my attitude, I don't like our affiliates blasting us on the internet while being so incredibly wrong.
@andrew_nfx Interesting how you don't mention that the two firms you are accusing of being scammers (my firms) have paid you $5,045.20 in the past. Should we talk about your ROI Mr. "3M+ in payouts"?
@Kellyanntrades@jmutrades@FFNFunding I answered this, your total lack of research on the program is appalling. But go ahead and critique it
https://t.co/rx66Kef58P
I didn't notice the screenshot, but that's wildly incorrect. The buffer is defined as
(.5*(((Balance at payout) - payout) - FFN's capital))
There are examples of the math of this in the rules, and I even made a page with a calculator for people to work it out. How lazy are you prop firm researchers? https://t.co/qzZTko4CKA
@jmutrades@FFNFunding Why would I try to automate payouts and put everything front and center with how much and when we pay people if we were going out of business? I have literally answered this on multiple of your threads, but congrats on learning about the word "solvent" and using it in a sentence.
@AshhNeo@jmutrades@FFNFunding That's incredibly lame, I'll restore the account and payout for you. You shouldn't be punished for using the risk tools. As you can imagine, it's impossible for me to have this context when reviewing over 2,000 violations. lol
What's a glitch? I don't think I said anything is a glitch.
Respectfully disagree massively on the live program. Tell me another firm that contributes capital to the live program as you succeed, leaves our 10% split in the account, bases the trading entirely off margin, gives you 100% drawdown until the first payout, and then enables a MLL that we payout all of your profits if you hit it, and gives monthly performance bonuses to live traders.
Focusing so much on starting balance is a shame, the program overall is incredible. Sim-funded earns you payouts based on account size in sim, and success in SIM earns you a seat at the table for the Institution. This whole sim profit move to live thing the prop space has invented is ludicrous. We've created a live program that rewards traders actually trying to develop a skill, and I'll die on that hill.
@honor236@jmutrades@FFNFunding If that happened, the traders should definitely reach out because we're not closing accounts for ghost orders over here.
@AshhNeo@jmutrades@FFNFunding The payout timing is just coincidence. We're automating the rule checks to speed up payouts. Also, you had one payout approved after the violation so I would have thought you'd be happy the old system didn't catch it immediately.