Hi. Can you please confirm whether hardware bans for boosting, in instances where an account had no prior warnings or bans, is the intended outcome?
@CallofDutyCM
@whatsatort@ossmarquin@Activision@ATVIAssist@CallofDutyCM@CallofDuty ... if he doesn't know exactly why he got banned, how is he supposed to learn anything from this? Seems to me like you didn't critically think this through and are just happy to see someone get banned because it gives a false sense of moral superiority.
@whatsatort@ossmarquin@Activision@ATVIAssist@CallofDutyCM@CallofDuty They also refuse to say exactly what the heid ban was for. 'Boosting' is extremely vaguely defined. It can e.g. be interpreted as: don't let your friends play in your account when they visit you (why was optic allowed to do this?). If he doesn't know why he got banned...
@whatsatort@ossmarquin@Activision@ATVIAssist@CallofDutyCM@CallofDuty CoD didn't do anything about boosting for years and now all of a sudden started hwid banning people outright. So for years they were fine with it and set a precedent just to go against their precedent. They are acting like hormonal teenagers.
@whatsatort@ossmarquin@Activision@ATVIAssist@CallofDutyCM@CallofDuty You realize that a hwid ban is basically a ban on you as a person? If he tried to create another account and sign in on a new device that device is getting hwid banned too? They classify this under 'ban evasion'. If you actually read the ToS you'd understand this.
@whatsatort@ossmarquin@Activision@ATVIAssist@CallofDutyCM@CallofDuty You're not making any sense? He learned nothing that he can apply in any way whatsoever because they hardware banned him without any warning. He can never play the game again. What about that don't you understand? Maybe if he got a temp ban you'd make sense