Olivia
Online
Amanda
@Euringer
Writer. Journalist. Content Strategist. Health Advocate. Yogi. Mom.
Joined February 2009
443 Following
520 Followers
3.1K Posts
Pinned Tweet
Key take-aways from our interview with Dr Martha Fulford, the infectious disease expert from McMaster's Children's Hospital in Ont. Canada.
1)Lockdowns are harmful for children
2) Masks are creating long term harms for children - including social development, and cognitive development
3) Children are statistically not at risk from this disease and don't need a vaccine to protect them
4) No one needs another person to be vaccinated to protect them. If you are vaccinated your vaccine is protecting you. No one needs to do that for you.
5)Natural immunity is robust , long lasting, and works.
#MasksDontWork
https://t.co/Wg3U7k6dTP
Canada is living through a real-life version of The Emperor’s New Clothes.
We are increasingly expected to ignore what we can see with our own eyes, deny what we know to be true, and repeat things we don’t believe simply because someone in a position of authority has decided they’re the correct things to say.
We’ve created a society in which certain subjects are sacred, certain questions are forbidden, and certain conclusions must be reached before the conversation has even begun.
We have data showing us where things are going wrong, but instead of getting angry about the problems, people get angry at the data. Apparently, pointing out that the emperor is naked is now more offensive than the fact that he’s walking around without pants.
Our institutions have become increasingly obsessed with policing not just what people do, but what they think. Employers demand approved opinions. Organizations enforce approved language. And mandatory training sessions increasingly resemble ideological re-education dressed up as professional development.
All of this is presented as progress.
But what exactly are we progressing towards?
A society where intelligent adults are afraid to ask obvious questions? Where disagreement is treated as a moral failing? Where facts are only acceptable when they support the approved narrative?
We’ve become so terrified of offending one another that we’ve forgotten how to speak to one another.
And perhaps most absurdly, we’ve confused disagreement with hatred.
Your political opponents are not your enemies. Someone who disagrees with your ideas is not automatically a fascist, a Nazi, a racist, or whatever other accusation happens to be fashionable this week.
You can believe someone is profoundly wrong without believing they are profoundly evil.
You can challenge a policy without attacking a person’s humanity.
And you can acknowledge an uncomfortable fact without endorsing every possible interpretation of it.
A functioning society requires the ability to do all three.
Because the purpose of free speech isn’t to guarantee that everyone agrees. It’s to make it possible for us to discover where we’re wrong, identify what’s broken, and work out how to fix it.
I believe we should be able to stand up and say, “Excuse me, but the emperor has no clothes.”
And instead of spending the next six months investigating the motives, political affiliations, and moral character of the person who pointed it out, perhaps we could do something revolutionary.
Get the emperor some freaking clothes.
The entire covid saga summed up in less than 2.5 mins.
Absolutely on the money, and hilarious AF 😭👌🏻⚡️
Who to follow
Sacha
@SieTee77
Cryptocoach, mit positiver Energie und Wertschätzung für Menschen teile ich mein Krypto-Know-how.
Clear Fr8 Limited
@Clear_Fr8_Ltd
Established in 2017 on the back of over 50 years of experience in Freight Forwarding, Customs Clearance & Logistics.
+𝟰𝟰(𝟬)𝟭𝟯𝟬𝟰 𝟴𝟬𝟲𝟰𝟮𝟱
Val_anne🇨🇦
@MacinnisVal
I love outdoors,gardening ,flowers
Mom,of 3 ,Nursing , I want to find a cabin by a lake! My country is falling !God Bless the Convoy !Cdn patriots
Someone finally made the doc that needed to be made...
For decades, Canada has been seen as a 'model nation', internationally renowned for its high standard of living, safety & friendliness. 🇨🇦
Recently, it's been making headlines for the wrong reasons. Unaffordability, homelessness & addiction, rising crime, and a healthcare system so stretched that thousands are dying as they await treatment.
'Broken Country' is a new documentary that explores what went wrong in Canada, and what can be done.
Watch it here: https://t.co/j0sRaqtFne
House Arrest Countdown - 2 days left of being locked down 24/7 for peacefully protesting lockdowns.
We’ll miss feigning shock and horror watching non-Canadians, violent criminals, sexual assaulters, drug dealers, human traffickers, and repeat offenders serving less (or no) time than a couple of western Canadians have for “mischief”.
@ChrisBarber1975 @18houseHouse
@Mel__Gibson01 Yes. Especially with the free access to a much larger and richer market right next door to our country, with the closest in values to us compared with other large global powers.
@Eric_TrumpRv Yes. I think we should do a prisoner swap: you can send Canada all your unhappy US citizens and they can change their dollars across the board to Canadian, and unhappy Canadians can go south. Same deal. I know what I would choose;)
It is with great concern for some of my fellow countrymen, inching precariously toward the edge of utter lunacy, that I write this post.
Prime Minister Mark Carney this week, in an interview with the New York Times, went on record saying it would be “irresponsible” not to plan for the possible contingency of a military invasion of Canada by the United States. Unfortunately, Mr. Carney didn’t misspeak or fall victim to a cherry-picked quote taken out of context. His concern was later reiterated by Defence Minister David McGuinty and Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Soloman.
We all know that Donald Trump has a colourful history of spouting off some truly outrageous whoppers from time to time, but even he has never disseminated something as fatuous, dangerous or dishonest as this. And while he seldom backs down from his outrageous claims, whenever he pushes the envelope too far, at least his entourage goes on damage control to walk back some of his excesses – Carney’s guys are doubling down.
Despite these idiotic statements, these are intelligent men. The odds that all three of them would simultaneously become afflicted by the same psychotic delusion is infinitesimally small. The only rational conclusion, therefore, is that they believe, or rather their polling data shows, that enough Canadians are so possessed by Trump Derangement that engaging in such asinine demagoguery is politically expedient.
Sadly, they may be right. The vast coalition of useful idiots and true believers after effectively having their intelligences insulted by their dear leader, are coming out of the woodwork to express gratitude online for the Prime Minister’s caution in preparing for all, including the most remote, contingencies. Others are retreating slightly to hold the line at the fall-back position articulated by Minister McGuinty that, this kind of paranoid delusion is perfectly normal and, “all militaries in the world spend time analyzing risk scenarios.”
I assure you, this is not normal.
Back on planet Earth, the situation is tense and acrimonious (and there is plenty of blame to go around for that), but this is not the more than two centuries of peace along the 49th parallel that followed the signing of the Treaty of Ghent in 1815 drawing to an end. Trump has imposed tariffs on $20 billion (or 2% of the $400 billion per year) of Canadian exports to the US. In other words, amid this unnecessary, escalatory, and foolish trade dispute, the United States will still purchase 200% more Canadian goods and services this year than the rest of the world combined. This situation is like a restaurant’s picky regular customer complaining about an overcooked steak to a prideful chef who, fortified in his own mind by the knowledge he cooked the steak perfectly, refuses to comp the entree. This is not the start of World War III. We are so far removed from a military incursion at our southern border that we may as well be strategizing the response to the equally plausible threat of Santa Claus leading an invasion of elves from the north.
If we woke up tomorrow in some parallel reality where the United States actually was contemplating a full-scale military campaign against Canada, with all due respect to our brave men and women in uniform, the only preparations to be made would be negotiating the terms of our unconditional surrender. Some brave and patriotic Canadians may refuse to submit and instead choose to conduct, as a matter of principle, a brutal and bloody guerilla warfare campaign against the strongest conventional and nuclear military force in the history of the world. Unfortunately, they would be in the precarious position of having to rely on our miserly European allies, or countries like Russia or China, whose recent actions have been significantly more hostile and provocative challenges to our sovereignty than the US tariffs, to supply us with weapons, and they would not remotely be adequate. It’s all so desperately preposterous.
But for the sake of argument, let’s suppose that Donald Trump was indeed the terrifying bogeyman haunting the dreams of the most extreme and hopeless sufferers of Trump Derangement Syndrome and its frightful sister affliction, Andrew Coyneism, a rare and especially acute form of tweet-induced psychotic maladjustment. Even in this scenario, why would Trump use the military to annex Canada? All he would have to do is offer Alberta statehood, liberation from transfer payments, excessive regulation and carbon taxes, carte blanche to exploit its natural resources, a generous welcome bonus in the form of a $100,000 tax credit to every adult Albertan and replace their Canadian dollars with equal amounts of US currency. They would effectively be acquiring Alberta for the knock-down bargain price of roughly 1x annual GDP.
Simultaneously, the US (including the newly acquired Alberta) would immediately cut off all trade with the rest of Canada. The net impact to Canada of this manoeuvre would be a cataclysmic economic collapse, while the newly composed United States would take a net GDP hit (loss of all trade with Canada, mostly offset by the acquisition of Alberta) of 0.8%. Next would come a full package of sanctions, a naval blockade, and when the rest of Canada became desperate enough, a Chinese belt-and-road style offtake of all of Canada’s resources at bargain prices, which by then, the Canadians would be desperate for. In the meantime, the US would revamp its immigration policy to recreate the brain-drain of the 1990s on steroids, welcoming the top 20% most productive Canadians to flee what had overnight become the third world. Harvard Alumnus Mark Carney might well be among those at the front of the line seeking this emigration opportunity, rejoining 91 percent of his own investments already located there.
There would, no doubt, be a fearsome contingent of Canadians refusing to bend or break in the face of American tyranny, and elbows would be flying up to vertiginous heights with such vigour that the Canadian healthcare system would be overwhelmed by millions of spontaneous emergency room visits of patriotic patients with dislocated shoulders.
I suspect many of you reading this are thinking to yourself that this is so completely far-fetched and absurd that, if serious, I must have lost my mind. Allow me to reassure you that while this is all bunk, it remains at least ten times more likely than the United States military executing a boots-on-the-ground invasion of Canada. Anyone who spends more than one second worrying about such an outcome should immediately proceed to the nearest sink to splash some cold water in their face and pull themselves together.
The China bots and Liberal zombies came out strong for this one, so I'll clarify:
The United States is the largest consumer market on earth. China is the largest export market. It's mutually beneficial for the two nations to maintain their trade relationship despite being adversaries—despite China being the primary source of funding for Russia's and Iran's war efforts.
The Trump administration didn't enter into a strategic partnership with China. The Carney Liberals did.
The Democrats and Republicans don't openly receive donations from CCP crime groups and United Front linked organizations (that we know of). The Liberals and elements within the Conservatives do.
Trump isn't agreeing to law enforcement coordination between the FBI and China.
The Carney Liberals are opening the RCMP to cooperation with China's Ministry of Public Security (federal police) as part of their strategic partnership.
Trump isn't agreeing to military coordination with China.
The Carney Liberals are entering into a military coordination agreement with China as part of their strategic partnership.
The Trump administration isn't importing 50,000 Chinese electric vehicles and other spyware into the United States. The Carney Liberals are.
The source of the fallout between Canada and the United States is China and all that was listed above.
It is possible to do trade with an adversary as long as the lines between the two nations are clearly drawn. The United States understands this, Canada does not.
Welcome to the real world.
These are not the words of someone looking to heal division, or looking for peace.
I started noticing a recurring theme in Mark Carney’s speeches awhile ago, so I went back through the record. 👀
June 9, 2025 — “a more dangerous and divided world” / “a darker, more competitive world”
June 17 — “this moment of transformation” / “a world where shocks are flowing across borders”
June 25 — “upheaval in the international order” / “unprecedented pressure”
July 1 — “a world fraught with turmoil and division”
Aug. 27 — “in a more divided world” / “hinge moment in history”
Sept. 5 — “The world is changing” / “This is not a transition, it’s a rupture”
Sept. 8 — “not a transition, but a rupture” / “economic uncertainty”
Sept. 11 — “not a transition. It is a rupture”
Sept. 18 — “in a divided world”
Sept. 22 — “rules-based order is eroding” / “This is not a transition; this is a rupture”
Sept. 23 — “the world is undergoing a fundamental shift” / “This isn’t a transition, it’s a rupture”
Sept. 24 — “The world is changing rapidly” / “today’s divided and dangerous world”
Oct. 10 — “an increasingly dangerous and divided world” / “a rupture” / “a rapidly changing world”
Oct. 16 — “increasingly dangerous and divided” / “This is not a transition; it’s a rupture” / “a rapidly changing world”
Oct. 17 — “a rapidly changing world — one that’s more divided, more uncertain” / “these upheavals”
Oct. 27 — “The world has become more dangerous and divided” / “The old world order is in the past”
Nov. 1 — “uncertainty” / “The old world… is in the process of disappearing” / “In an uncertain world”
Jan. 20, 2026 — “a rupture in the world order” / “the beginning of a harsh reality” / “We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition”
Jan. 26 — “The rapidly changing world” / “a cloud of uncertainty and worry”
Feb. 17 — “the world has changed” / “a more fractured and darker world”
Mar. 26 — “the world has changed” / “an increasingly dangerous and divided world” / “a more fractured and darker world”
May 14 — “a rapidly changing world” / “uncertainty casts its heavy shadow”
May 20 — “In an uncertain world” / “In a rapidly changing world”
June 14 — “a rapidly changing world” / “more dangerous and divided” / “moment of rupture”
June 25 — “a rapidly changing, more volatile world”
July 1 — “a more dangerous and divided world”
July 2 — “a more dangerous and divided world” / “The world is more dangerous and divided”
July 6 — “a more dangerous and divided world” / “History is back with a vengeance”
July 16 — “a more dangerous and divided world” — repeated multiple times
July 29 — “an increasingly divided and dangerous world”
Sept. 15 — “The world has changed” / “an uncertain world” / “a world undergoing a rupture” / “an increasingly uncertain world”
Different venues. Different subjects. Same vocabulary keeps returning:
Dangerous. Divided. Darker. Fractured. Uncertain. Volatile. Upheaval. Rupture. 🌎
So what do you think he’s trying to get across with this recurring message?
Is it simply how he sees the world right now — or is there a broader purpose behind repeating it so often? 🤔
Curious to hear how others read it.
#MarkCarney #cdnpoli #Canada
@CaptCanada_Eh Woah. Good catch. I think it’s predictive programming for the rupture he’s planning…
CBC just spent 5 minutes on how horrible it is that Trump is banning CNN, MSNow, Political all far far left news agencies from the White House but they have no problem with the Liberals blocking Rebel News, True North, Western Standard and The Counter Signal from theirs.
This right here. There had been so much mad messaging in so many areas in the last decade.
Every glib, arrogant, virtue-signalling celebrity who’s broadcast the lie that kids will kill themselves if not allowed to transition deserves to have this read aloud to them non-stop through a megaphone for a year.
Why is our mainstream news not SHOWING UP at the Allison Inquiry?! When did stories like this not rank FRONT PAGE news? Any other time in history it would be. Any other time in history in Canada real journalists would be there, writing about it. Please share, so that the story gets out there. #CanadaIsBroken
https://t.co/fl7UWNa3yw
Canada is the only country to bring this many vaccine-injured to testify under oath, and MSM won’t cover it. Please share the livestream - flood X.
"If anyone builds it everyone dies" makes the case like this:
Why do you eat ice cream? It's not healthy. It's not essential for you. It doesn't fulfill any logical, rational need. You SHOULD just want some blended slurry of meat, sugar, nutrients and get your needs met efficiently. But, we just want ice cream anyway.
According to the book, what a sufficiently complex intelligence spontaneously "wants" isn't rational or predictable. You have to assume that you can NOT predict what it wants and that you control what it wants less, as it gets more intelligent.
And then there's this...Brave. New. World.
Yeah. That was weird….
HOLY HELL!!
There's a pretty big admission in this short 2012 WEF article!
John McArthur (Rhodes Scholar, Rockefeller agent, Millennium Development Goals co-creator, Policy Horizons Canada) wrote that the "Occupy" and "99%" movements were supported by Carney and Soros. Not only that, McArthur says that the movement was ramped-up to target the 2012 US election season. Obama ran on a campaign that used this movement, which definitely helped secure his Presidency.
Last December, Carney appointed McArthur as Deputy Secretary to the Cabinet for Economic Policy in the Privy Council Office.
Hopefully this helps you see the bigger picture a little more clearly.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Binawe
Seen from Malaysia
Matdin
Seen from Malaysia
Kailyn Makena
Nichamon Nattapongkunakorn Jinnie
Seen from Thailand
விஜயலட்சுமி
Seen from Singapore
Deliman1905
Seen from Turkey
Advoree
Seen from United States
Gizem
Seen from Germany
مؤمن | صلّوا عليه ﷺ
Seen from Indonesia
احلى سكس و بنات حلوين ♥️🤗
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.8M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.4M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.4M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.2M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.7M followers
X
@x
60.6M followers