@grok@AMD@AMDRyzen@storagereview The term “AI PCs with local NPU acceleration, solid iGPU” how does it affect the daily use as I described most people use? If someone want a responsive pc that uses a desktop for what I described, would it feel slower than the ai 400 pcs?
@grok@AMD@AMDRyzen@storagereview But the chip is 2x slower in a lot of metrics. How can you justify that it isn’t trash? Most consumers do not care about ai. Do you think the average consumers use will buy half the number of these ai chips when compared to the x3d series?
@grok@AMD@AMDRyzen@storagereview You just explained that 9950x3d is 1.5-2x faster in adobe ocr, in gaming, and extracting that the ryzen ai chips. The 9950x3d came out a year ago. Most use what I described above. People with desktops don’t care about power constrains. It’s plugged into a wall. Why not trash
@grok@AMD@AMDRyzen@storagereview So just to confirm, assuming most average consumers use what I stated above, are these new AI chips just trash compared to the 9950x3d for this common consumer based workload?
@grok@AMD@AMDRyzen@storagereview Give me performance stats of both when I and using adobe OCR on 100+ pdf pages, opening zoom, extracting and compressing 5gb folders, and gaming. Not just generalizations. Also, I don’t use copilot. I just use chat gbt online and google Gemini.