Ev

[Pete North @FUDdaily]

This is why Israel had to flatten Gaza. You can't live peacefully with this.

[Ev @EvaPrior2]

@Bestiuk1 Epitomises the lyrics: 'The BOYS are BACK in town...'

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

This is absolutely heartbreaking to listen to.

A local woman tells more about the migrant attack in Belfast

The victim is SPECIAL NEEDS, he struggles as it is

He was jumped by TWO MIGRANTS, not one.

THERE'S ANOTHER SUDANESE MAN INVOLVED RUNNING FREE- HE MUST BE ARRESTED IMMEDIATELY

The man who was attacked was HELPING the migrant attackers move in to their accommodation

HE WAS BEING KIND TO THEM AND THEY REPAID THAT WITH VIOLENCE

He is believed to be blind in one eye and has completely lost the other, he was already hard of hearing

"WHAT KIND OF LIFE IS HE GOING TO HAVE WHEN HE COMES OUT OF INTENSIVE CARE?"

[Ev @EvaPrior2]

@FUDdaily The Retirement home Party for failed Tories will just brass neck forward as per.

[Ev @EvaPrior2]

@FUDdaily "If Starmer were even slightly politically astute,"
It's been obvious since his first 'Far-right thugs' rant, that he's NOT.
He doesn't have the ability to see a problem from more than one side. His legal success relied on alliance with one side, and full force attack on other/s

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I see Zack Polanski has labelled Restore Britain 'extremists'.

The real extremist position is to willingly import savage third world animals who attempt to behead others in the street.

Just my thoughts.

[Christian @InTheTrenchesUK]

Do gather round, everyone. Andrew Western is in Geneva. Representing us.

Oh how wonderfully marvellous. Fourteen likes, dear boy. Fourteen. Three retweets. The nation is not exactly overwhelmed by your representation, is it pet?

You spent two days in Geneva. First class? Business class? Or did you swim? Do tell. The taxpayer is simply dying to know how much it cost to send you to deliver a plenary speech to people who cannot name a single thing you have ever accomplished.

You represent Stalybridge and Hyde. Unemployment there is higher than the national average. Youth joblessness is rampant. And you are in Geneva discussing "global cooperation." Bless your little cotton socks. The cooperation you should be discussing is with your own constituents. The ones you have abandoned for a mini-break with canapés.

You have been an MP since 2017. Eight years. Name one business you have helped start. Name one job you have created. Name one constituent whose life you have improved. We shall wait. The floor is yours.

Silence is rather telling, isn't it love?

You do not represent Britain in Geneva. You represent the rancid carcass of a political class that thinks international conferences matter while your towns rot. You represent the sewer of a career spent climbing while your constituents sink.

Slither back from Geneva, darling. Your constituents did not send you there. They did not ask for this. They asked for jobs. For safety. For representation. You gave them a press release about plenary speeches.

Whatever next? The International Conference of People Who Have Never Run a Business?

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

The Belfast victim has lost his left eye and has severe damage to his right eye.

Hacked at the neck, with his eyes gouged.

Men who inflict this brutal evil on others do not deserve to live.

[Ranty Man @RanTeeThree]

Starmer is a lawyer. He has spent his life using the law to get what he wants. He believes power emanates from the law. He is wrong. Power emanates from the people. When the people are pushed far enough, the law becomes meaningless. Observance of the law is at the leisure of the people. It does not come as a mandate from Westminster.

Unless Starmer recognises this right now, he is going to take Britain into a place where he will be out of his depth. He keeps doubling down. He blames the frustrated and angry people of Britain for the consequences of his decisions.

Either he is phenomenally tone deaf, or he plans to deliberately inflame Britain in order to use it as a means of awarding himself more authoritarian powers. Neither will get him what he wants.

If he is tone deaf, then things will just keep getting worse. If he is Machiavellian, then he has miscalculated.

Awarding yourself more powers doesn't work when:

1. The people don't recognise your powers
2. You have alienated the police from the people and you lack the authority to enforce them
3. You have sowed mistrust of the judiciary among the people
4. You have emasculated your final backstop - the military.

The time for Starmer to act is now.

Step back from the constant escalation.
Recognise the mood of the country.
Acknowledge the concerns of the public.
Do something to address the problem.

Millions of us, 600 of you. If you think you're going to go toe to toe with the public, it's going to work out very bad for everyone involved.

Once the Rubicon has been crossed and the country descends into lawlessness, the law will be irrelevant.

[Ev @EvaPrior2]

@FUDdaily Word perfect statement, except the last word. You had the opportunity to aptly use your favourite word; but chose 'h' instead of your usual 'l'!

[Ev @EvaPrior2]

@InTheTrenchesUK @Mackenz46950920 "You have only appetites." !!!

Literally as well as metaphorically.

[Ev @EvaPrior2]

@JChimirie66677 @kunocaver @zarahussain999 "The burning of homes is wrong."

Importantly, the above wrong only occurred as a direct result of the occurrence of all the other wrongs stated in the same paragraph.

[Patrick McGreal @PSIA1851]

The Constitution of Ireland guarantees that no citizen shall be deprived of his personal liberty save in accordance with law. The Court of Appeal, in two judgments delivered on 22 January 2026 arising from my own proceedings, confirmed that personal liberty means freedom from unlawful detention, unlawful imprisonment, and unlawful confinement, given a broad meaning. Physical freedom and physical movement are at the heart of that guarantee.

Personal liberty can be restricted by law. The Oireachtas provided for precisely that in section 263 of the Policing, Security and Community Safety Act 2024, which allows the Minister for Justice to designate the Courts Service as an authorised body, enabling security screening at the Four Courts. That law exists. The Minister has not used it. No ministerial designation order under section 263(1) has been made.

The Courts Service and MCR Group are currently restricting citizens' physical movement into the Four Courts without any lawful basis. The law provides the mechanism. The Minister has not activated it. That gap between what the law permits and what the Minister has done means every citizen stopped at the door of the Four Courts is being subjected to an unlawful restriction of their constitutional right to personal liberty.

[Edward Oakenfull @EdwardOakenfull]

@CrewkerneMan @Amanda981971 Please post this video of the hypocrite that is Reform MP Robert Jenrick.

Never forget he brought over 20k Afghans to Britain and got a Super Injunction so that the media could not talk about it.

Reform are not capable or reforming anything. Never trust them or vote for them.

[Ev @EvaPrior2]

@Alexandr4Denman Can predict with absolute certainty that it will be at 117% by the end of this week.

[British Unapologetically 🇬🇧 @patriotismbrit]

My vote goes to Rupert Lowe.

Reform never looked like a movement for change. It looked like a retirement home for politicians who helped create the mess Britain is in today.

Agree?

[Neil 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @HomelessVets24]

@ZiaYusufUK This you.... Both of your MPs were in office when he arrived in the UK and was given leave to remain....
All Tory MPs have baggage, hence why i could never vote Reform again... https://t.co/3WW4Guwsop

[Donna Louise @DonnaLouise1212]

This thick-as-shit Labour government is banning kids from social media to "protect" them from seeing naked images.
But they're absolutely fine with little Timmy watching naked blokes riding bikes, leather gimp masks, and nipple tassels flapping in the Pride parade wind.
Make it make sense. 😂

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

We Are Not Failing to Stop the Boats. We Are Choosing Not To

The small-boats crisis is no longer a failure of policy. It is a refusal to apply one. The British state knows how to stop these crossings. It chooses not to. Everything else is smoke, mirrors, and motion designed to disguise that fact.

We have paid France £480 million to help protect our border. Not symbolically. In hard cash, over a fixed period, for a stated purpose. A country does not hand over half a billion pounds unless it expects cooperation, and a country that accepts that money is, by definition, willing to help. Yet the boats still leave French beaches in broad daylight. They are tracked, filmed, and escorted across one of the most monitored stretches of water on earth before being delivered into Britain. That is not failure. It is consent dressed up as effort.

The missing step is obvious and never addressed. Cooperation is not the obstacle, so the answer is simple. Anyone intercepted in the Channel should be returned to French shores. No asylum claim. No processing theatre. No reward for illegal entry. The Royal Navy has the ships, the discipline, and the command structure to intercept safely and decisively, separating crews from passengers and enforcing a clear outcome. That single rule would end the trade overnight. Smugglers know it. Migrants know it. Ministers know it. Which is precisely why it is never applied.

Instead, we are offered distraction. Patrols that observe but do not enforce. Payments that continue regardless of outcome. And now, a new sleight of hand: China.

Keir Starmer's "landmark" deal with Beijing to share intelligence on Chinese engines is the latest attempt to move the argument anywhere except where it belongs. We are told that sixty per cent of the engines are Chinese, as if the nationality of an outboard motor explains why tens of thousands of people are delivered safely into Britain each year. It does not. Engines are replaceable. Routes are not. What makes the journey worthwhile is not the boat, but the guarantee of arrival.

If every Chinese engine vanished tomorrow, the crossings would continue. Different engines. Different suppliers. Same beaches. Same outcome. Because the policy signal remains unchanged: reach British waters and you will be brought ashore. That is not border control. It is assisted entry with uniforms and paperwork attached.

This is why the Royal Navy is kept at arm's length. Not because it lacks ships or skill, but because once interception becomes enforcement, the question of return can no longer be dodged. And once that question is answered honestly, the entire performance collapses.

Calling this problem "complex" insults the public. The solution already exists. It is not applied because the outcome is tolerated. The £480 million paid to France is not buying deterrence. It is buying plausible deniability. The China deal is not smashing gangs. It is smothering scrutiny.

And while this theatre continues, the cost is not abstract. It is paid in pressure on housing, policing, and public trust. It is paid in the erosion of social cohesion. And it is paid most heavily by women and girls, who are asked to absorb the risks of a system that refuses to enforce its own borders while insisting everything is under control.

Everyone can see this now. The pretence is threadbare. Yet the government persists with the lie, because admitting the truth would require doing the one thing it will not do.

The boats keep coming not because we cannot stop them, but because we choose not to.

"The Royal Navy has the ships, the discipline, and the command structure to intercept safely and decisively, separating crews from passengers and enforcing a clear outcome."

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

"The boats will not stop until Britain stops making itself the most attractive destination in Europe. Every other question is secondary to that one."