đš GREECE TO EU: âTHE INVASION OF EUROPE IS OVERâ đš
đŽ Greece just slammed the door shut on illegal migration.
đŁïž âDonât come here. Weâll put you in jail or send you home.â
đ New laws mean NO asylum loopholes. NO more abuse of the system. NO open borders.
đ„ illegals from North Africa?
âĄïž Straight to detention.
âĄïž No handouts. No waiting game.
âĄïž Fast-tracked deportation.
đą WHAT THIS MEANS:
â ïž Greece is DEFYING the EUâs open-borders agenda.
â ïž Sovereign nations are starting to rise and say NO to globalist invasion plans.
â ïž The so-called ârefugee crisisâ was never organic â it was engineered.
đ„ Greece just proved: You CAN secure your borders.
đ„ You CAN resist Brussels.
đ„ You CAN protect your people.
đš THIS IS THE NEW FRONTLINE IN THE FIGHT FOR EUROPE. đš
đĄïž Time for other nations â including the UK â to follow suit.
đš GLOBALISM JUST DIED IN DAVOS
Howard Lutnick just walked into the lionâs den â and told the World Economic Forum exactly what they didnât want to hear.
âGlobalism has failed.â
Not whispered.
Not softened.
Declared â on their own stage.
He dismantled the entire WEF doctrine in minutes:
âą Offshoring hollowed out the West
âą Cheap labor destroyed innovation
âą Net Zero made Europe dependent on China
âą Sovereignty begins with borders
âą Nations must control their industry, energy, and medicine
Then came the line that shook the room:
âWhy would Europe agree to Net Zero when they donât even make a battery?â
Thatâs the truth globalists canât answer.
Green agendas without industry.
Climate pledges without sovereignty.
Moral posturing while outsourcing power to Beijing.
America First isnât isolation.
Itâs independence.
And Lutnick made it crystal clear:
The old model is finished.
The globalist experiment has failed.
And the future belongs to nations that put their people first.
Davos just heard the obituary â live.
HABIBI ABDUL: How does Abdul El-Sayed respond when an Arab American leader and supporter blasts "Democratic Zionists" and calls for a "free, free Palestine from the river to the sea," "free from Zionists," who believe in a state of Israel for Jewish people?
Three days after Abdul El-Sayed won a U.S. Senate seat, I walked into a Marriott ballroom last Friday night in Chantilly, Va., for one of his first public appearances. I didn't know what would unfold.
I soon encountered the "red-green" alliance that brought El-Sayed to office and witnessed their anti-Israel rhetoric, their goals and their bullying tactics, dressed up in gowns and evening wear.
READ our full @FoxNews Digital investigation here: https://t.co/9p93CpowOF
Soon after El-Sayed arrived in a luxury SUV that pulled up to the side security dock, Issam Andoni, the chairman of the Arab America Foundation, didn't speak in riddles when he took the stage to introduce El-Sayed to about 500 Arab Americans in the room and two special non-Arabs in the front row: pro-communist, pro-China CodePink co-founder Medea Benjamin and her husband, Tighe Barry.
Andoni bragged "Habibi Abdul" had overcome opposition from "Democratic Zionists" and how he had "destroyed AIPAC twice," referencing the pro-Israel lobbying group.
A "Zionist" is anyone who believes in the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state.
He said a "movement" had formed behind El-Sayed, and that it was "going to grow and grow and grow" and "connect with other movements."
And then, invoking the sumud â or steadfastness â "of our people in Gaza, West Bank and Lebanon," he said: "I'm sure we'll see a free Palestine from the river to the sea."
"A free Palestine, free Palestine from the river to the sea. Free from occupation. Free from Zionists. And free from corruption. And free from apartheid."
El-Sayed listened, his hands clasped in front of him, smiling quietly.
Dr. @yudapearl, I thought of you as I filmed this speech. It confirms your thesis that the word "Zionist" has become the Trojan horse for anti-semitism and the destruction of the state of Israel through the phenomenon of "Zionophobia," as you coined it.
@DavidSuissaJJ@JoshKraushaar@BillAckman@OrliPeter, friends: please note how the rhetoric to make Palestine "free of Zionism" "from the river to the sea," a land that covers modern day Israel, adds up to the destruction of the state of Israel as a Jewish state.
My video work is a little wobbly at moments because I got media credentials to cover the event but El-Sayed's backers were constantly harassing me during El-Sayed's speech as I filmed the event, corralling me away from the stage, the balding man in front me, Omar Kurdi, standing in front of me to block my view, a woman scolding me to "go to the back" as I was on bended knee, filming. They didn't harass any other reporters.
In this thread I'll explain, plainly, what the "red-green" alliance is, what activists mean when they say "free from Zionists" and "from the river to the sea" and how to translate messaging about remarks El-Sayed later said about "rules-based" systems, mirroring Chinese propaganda, so you can understand and protect yourself against cognitive warfare.
Om svenskhet inte Àr mer Àn ett papper utfÀrdat av en tjÀnsteman pÄ en myndighet, kan den ocksÄ upphöra genom ett papper utfÀrdat av en tjÀnsteman pÄ en myndighet.
NÀr man lÀser förarbetena till beslutet att tillÄta dubbla medborgarskap blir det tydligt hur naiva vÄra makthavare varit.
Flera remissinstanser, inte minst Försvarsmakten, varnade med all rÀtt för risker som sÀkerhetshot och dubbla lojaliteter.
Men regeringen avfĂ€rdade kritiken och körde vidare med samma gamla argument: âInvandring Ă€r bra, mĂ„ngkultur berikar och vi mĂ„ste frĂ€mja integrationen.â
Att riksdagen nu valt att Àndra grundlagen för att möjliggöra Äterkallelse av medborgarskap Àr Ätminstone ett litet steg i rÀtt riktning.
Svenska skattemedel gĂ„r till att frĂ€mja mĂ„nggifte och att ha âstrategierâ som gĂ„r ut pĂ„ att göra fruarna konstant gravida för att dessa inte ska umgĂ„s med icke-muslimer eller gud bevars: judar.
KÀnns det som vÀl spenderade pengar?
MĂ€nniskor födda pĂ„ den hĂ€r sidan millennieskiftet har ingen aning om hur tryggt och homogent Sverige đžđȘ en gĂ„ng var.
Och det Àr ingenting som skolan lÀr ut.
Vi som vĂ€xte upp under 1960-70-80-talet kommer dock ihĂ„g kĂ€nslan av att vara svensk đžđȘ. đ
Ja, verkligen. Socialism och diktatur (som den frÄn EU ledarskapet som de flesta inte verkar se/fatta) har förstört Europas nationer numera med öppna grÀnser & globalist agendan frÄn UN! Som vi njöt av att fÄ Äka ned & uppleva de olika unika lÀndernas kultur&sprÄk pÄ 60, 70 & 80 talet! Nu Àr det Allah & halalmat som dominerar & sprÄken.. vrÄl av Allah Akbar i alla lÀnder. Nu lÀngtar man inte efter nÄn kulturresa till France Italy or Spain precis. VÄra förfÀder jobbade hÄrt för ett bygga upp de moderna unika lÀnderna. Raderas girt nu!
@DTruthsQ Yes, progressivism and socialism is diametrically opposed to the U.S. Constitution, Progressive and DSA candidates should never have been or be on the ballot!!
@DTruthsQ My heart is tooâŠread his auto biography, I believe My Grandfathersâs Son, what an amazing man of character he isâŠcritical thinkerâŠđđđ absolutely love him and his love for our Constitution and America
@SusieDodge2@DTruthsQ And I will never forget the hatred & lies that he had to go through either. Horrendous! But thank God truth & his strength got him through it all so he could get his Supreme Court seat.
Democrats cheated to "win". They stole 15% of Republicans votes in every state
@truthanswersall
When I first posted the 15% Band, I compared Republicans vs. Democrats, so it covered 30 Senate races.
Now that results are nearly final, I updated it to include every vote: Republicans, Democrats, independents, third parties, everyone, in all 35 Senate races. Then I ran a new regression analysis. Once again, the number came back .85.
34 of 35 Senate Republicans fell below President Trump's 2024 share. Red states and blue states lost the same proportion.
In some states the lost votes went to Democrats. In others, like Idaho, Nebraska and Montana, they went to independents. Different opponents, different places for the votes to go, and the Republican share still landed at about 85%.
This isn't just an average. An average can hide states scattered all over the place. A regression tests whether one rule fits every state.
Here, it does: Trump's 2024 share Ă .85 lands close to the Republican result state after state after state, and explains 87% of the differences between them (RÂČ = .87).
Five nights ago, I was pretty sure. Tonight, I know.
This is real. It deserves an answer.