Did you ever look at a carrot and think 'I wish my scientific plots were this color'. No? Then this is the color palette you never knew you needed. Because you probably don't. https://t.co/kGfj7FKNQ5
"I think of science’s mission as opening the black box of nature. It's a bit nonsensical to do that with tools that we are not allowed to open and understand, including proprietary software." @fperez_org, on the origins of #Jupyter, https://t.co/D3l12it09v
📢 We're offering some new runnings of our famous *Intro to Geocomputing* class this September (🕗 for Europe, Africa, Middle East) and November (🕗 for Americas) — check them out https://t.co/ucTo5CrxYL and get stuck into digital @geoscience 🚀
@KeepItRheol @seismo_steve I might hire a company to acquire seismic data, but I wouldn't say the data is mine unless I owned it outright. But I would say, "these fault interpretations on this data are mine". Also might regard those interpretations themselves as data (they were in fact collected by me)
@KeepItRheol @seismo_steve I see "data" and "measurement" as different from "observation" and "interpretation", but these words can mean different things in different environments. Interpretations are individual, whereas data may not be.
@KeepItRheol @seismo_steve In that situation I would say it is appropriate. However in cases where folks don't acquire the data, but then make "my data" statements, it's just off-putting. Upsets me because it very clearly isn't "their data".