Expelsword

Star Ocean Storyteller / Gamebreaker

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@Stealth40k Shouldn't the collections include more games you can't ALREADY purchase for the Switch?

Call me insane but a Switch Port of Sonic '06 would be more useful than this.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

I love my wife.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@ViolinSpeedruns Oogie Boogie is a terrible fight overall but at least hitting him with presents to knock him down makes sense.
All the Organization fights have RCs that make it feel like Sora is using their own moves against them.
He's not winning by conjuring a magical theme park ride.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@ViolinSpeedruns There's a huge difference in presentation.
When you do a RC, Sora is quickly reacting in real time, to a specific enemy or situation. Attraction Flow has everything stop to revolve around them and no sense of belonging. They just appear randomly without reason.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@MBTYuGiOh Showed my childhood friend Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon and she said "Yeah that looks like a classic Yugi cheat card...".

Showed her Kashtira Arise-Heart and she exclaimed "WTF!?"

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@sonic_hedgehog If it "has all the same properties as the real Emerald", is it even fake?

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@MBTYuGiOh Sawatari used this card as a bootleg MST against Yuya in Episode 4.

His deck was not shown to contain any Continuous Spells, so the only reason it worked is because he had stolen the Pendulum Magicians ahead of time.

Just an excuse to show off the "wacky powers" of Pend cards.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@PoorlyAgedStuff Being honest, I follow you to see what mind-boggling graphics the PlayStation can produce. That's not something you see every day.

Not how many times Trump lied this week.
I can get that anywhere.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@dzeeff Forgive the quite late entry, but I wanted to choose a monster that no one else would ever pick. My wife loved the guy and put way more into the artwork than I asked her to!

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@Imperiu39957614 @MBTYuGiOh https://t.co/BOWezB0huU

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@HayateUesugi @CloudXDP @shadydoorags In the case of Pot of Greed, the card simply says "Do X". If you can't do X (Draw 2 cards), you just can't activate it.

Same thing with Reinforcement of the Army. If you don't have any Level 4 or lower Warriors in your Deck, it would be an illegal activation.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@HayateUesugi @CloudXDP @shadydoorags Yes. About the Runick Spells:
"Do X, then do Y", you need to be able to do both X and Y when you activate the card.

Of course it's possible that you are able to do both, then your opponent responds with something to make Y impossible, then when it resolves you just do X.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@GraffTheChrono @shadydoorags Again, the ruling you linked does not go against what I am saying. Resolving a card is not the same as activating it (Deck can change mid chain).

You can resolve Pot of Greed with 1 card in your deck (and lose) but you cannot have activated it as such.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@GraffTheChrono @shadydoorags What I have said is not inconsistent with the ruling you are citing. See the rulings for Card Destruction, which is quite explicit:
https://t.co/P2QpTLZdIj
I believe the TCG and OCG are unified on this rule (though they do sometimes differ)

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@saiseihime @dumbusername14 @Dreamboum The funniest thing about the game to me, is that due to Goofy's MP Gift being resource positive (2 MP into 3 MP), it's actually better for the team to put MP boosters on Goofy than Donald.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@CloudXDP @shadydoorags Note the second ruling. You're not permitted to activate a card that would make YOU deck out, but you can force your opponent to deck out.

I don't know the official basis for this, beyond "that's how Konami decided it should work", but the game IS about trying to win, not lose.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@CloudXDP @shadydoorags Card Destruction is not permitted either, consistent with rulings.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@CloudXDP @shadydoorags See here for an example, I am not allowed to activate Allure of Darkness or Shard of Greed (which would draw 2 cards) while I have only 1 card in the deck.

[Expelsword @Expelsword]

@GraffTheChrono @shadydoorags The number of cards in your deck can change after you activate Pot of Greed, but before you resolve it. That's what the ruling covers.

You can see here in Master Duel, I am not permitted to activate Allure of Darkness or Shard of Greed (which draw 2) with only 1 card in my deck.