David

[Susanne Delaney @SuzieD755164]

🇮🇪 🇬🇧 5 to 10 YEARS FOR PEPPER-SPRAY "FIREARM", BUT BLADES FOR RELIGIOUS REASONS OK

A "Compare & Contrast" In Wake of Henry Nowak's Death & Police Response:

In the UK and Ireland, people are increasingly afraid. Diversity crime is exploding. Yet, self-defence sprays are illegal.

In both countries, pepper spray is strictly illegal and classified as an illegal/unlicensed firearm. It is treated with the same severity as carrying a gun, carrying maximum prison sentences of up to 10 years in the UK and up to 5 years (7 years in some circumstances) in Ireland. Yet, in Ireland, Gardaí use double-strength pepper spray on peaceful Irish protesters.

Conversely, in the UK and Ireland, the law allows kirpans (ceremonial blades) in public for "religious reasons". The law dictates that if the blade is used or intended to be used as a weapon, the religious defense is void. SO WHY WAS VICKRUM DIGWA ALLOWED TO CARRY ANY BLADE WHEN HE WAS CAUGHT WITH A STASH OF STOLEN BLADES IN 2023?

He had a kirpan and a 21cm tactical dagger (a Persian knife) and had previously stolen "Shastar" weapons from a local "Gurdwara".

In Ireland, the law does allow carrying a blade for "religious reasons," though the law lacks the explicit statutory language seen in the UK, leaving it to judicial discretion.

The Murder of Henry Nowak:

[NOTE: WHEN POLICE ARRIVED ON SCENE, DIGWA'S FATHER WAS SEEN HOLDING UP HENRY. THIS CAN MAKE A PERSON BLEED OUT FASTER.]

The reality of DEI biases came to light in this case. Vickrum Digwa had a 21cm tactical dagger (a Persian knife), which Digwa said was for "religious purposes".

Vickrum Digwa launched a brutal, unprovoked attack on 18-year-old university student Henry Nowak as the teenager walked home from a night out.

When law enforcement arrived at the scene, institutional incompetence and systemic bias took over. Digwa and his family conspired and weaponised their protected status as a religious community by fabricating a story, falsely claiming that Henry had racially abused Digwa and knocked off his turban.

Rather than assessing the physical reality of the scene (where a young white man, Henry, was bleeding out from five stab wounds, including one to the heart), the responding officers blindly accepted Digwa’s narrative.

Immediately accepting the false accusation of a hate crime, the police treated the dying teenager as a hostile suspect, despite Henry being prone on the ground, clearly suffering, and declaring several times (through blood-filled lungs) that he couldn't breathe and needed help. At one point he said, "Please officer." He also stated he had been stabbed. The officer replied by saying, "I don't think you have, mate."

Instead of receiving life-saving first aid, an unarmed and mortally wounded Henry was DRAGGED ACROSS THE GRAVEL, PINNED, AND AGGRESSIVELY CUFFED (FACEDOWN).

As he lay dying in agony, desperately gasping and covered in blood (the judge noted in court that Henry had blood on his clothing and slit wounds in his clothes), his pleas were entirely dismissed. Meanwhile, another officer could be heard calling an ambulance to treat a minor scratch on the killer.

Digwa's family knew their relative had stabbed Henry and stood around and implicated Henry.

Precious, irreplaceable minutes were squandered treating the actual victim like a criminal. By the time the police finally realised the gravity of Henry's internal injuries and removed the handcuffs, it was too late.

Henry Nowak died as police read him "his rights" during his arrest.

Henry is dead because of a D.E.I. police response that prioritised a fabricated narrative of a non-white Sikh over a young white male who, by all accounts, was hardworking, kind, and inclusive.

He died in agony and fear AND in a state of indignity.

Keir Starmer has said he will not be banning kirpan knife carrying. In Ireland, Gardaí were not allowed to wear turbans until a few years ago. Now they can and, like any Sikh, can carry a blade.

Rest In Peace Henry.

[Michael Connell 🇮🇪 @FeargAgusFuath]

When one accepts the truth that Ireland belongs to the Irish, all charges of "racism" are rendered moot. It is meaningless word with no application.
But the man who declares, "Ireland for all." He is evil one. The Traitor trying to rob you of your inheritance.

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

You will not carry knives in my country nor will you kill yourselves on the streets of Dublin. Some cheek. Don't be bringing your troubles to my land. It's unacceptable. It's ungrateful after we took you in, housed you, fed you and clothed you

[Ola @olace0]

@ExposeDavidOC @JustRaging01 Well unfortunately people carry knives David. Not all are black tho, plenty are also calcausisn, so revaluate your mindset David

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@MagnitudeAFC @JustRaging01 You shouldn't use the internet to vent your rage on complete strangers. You should see someone if things are that bad♥️

[Susanne Delaney @SuzieD755164]

🚨 URGENT: LETTER TEMPLATE TO ENACT PROTOCOL 21 BEFORE THE THE JUNE DEADLINE TO AVOID EU IMMIGRATION RACKETEERING & LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY

Protocol 21 is a legal mechanism attached to the European Union's Lisbon Treaty. It is Ireland’s "opt-in" protocol for EU laws regarding policing, immigration, and justice.

Protocol 21 gives us the choice to opt in or out in EU legislation concerning the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice. Such as asylum, immigration and border policy

Under the protocol, the default position is that we are automatically opted out of any new EU laws in these categories. However, we can "opt-in" on a case by case basis. If the Irish government opts in, it must get approval from both houses of its parliament (the Oireachtas) within three months of the proposal being introduced. Both Ireland and the UK operate under a "common law" system, whereas most of continental Europe operates under "civil law." The protocol protects certain distinct features of Ireland’s legal framework from being overwritten.

Historically, Ireland has aggressively used the protocol to opt into police and criminal cooperation measures (usually around 60% to 70% of the time), but has been much more cautious with asylum and migration laws.

Back in June 2024, the Irish Government voted to opt in to the EU Migration Pact. Because of Protocol 21, Ireland didn’t have to join, but the government chose to do so.

To make this EU pact legally binding in Ireland, the government is currently pushing through the International Protection Bill 2026, which completely replaces Ireland's old asylum laws.

People writing to their TDs demanding that the government trigger Protocol 21 to "opt out" before the June 2026 deadline. By choosing not to use our Protocol 21 opt out, our nation is giving up its sovereignty to Brussels over WHO enters the country.

Because of the "Solidarity Pool" EU countries must either accept a relocated quota of asylum seekers or pay a financial contribution (roughly €20,000 per person they reject) into a central pool (sounds like racketeering) We need the government to use Protocol 21 to avoid these mandatory rules. It is incredibly unlikely this will be enacted. The Dáil already voted to opt in, the European Commission formally accepted Ireland’s participation, and the legal framework is already being locked into Irish law via the 2026 Bill.

However it is worth putting your request on record.

Subject: Urgent: Use Protocol 21 to Opt-Out of the EU Migration Pact

Dear Deputy [TD's Last Name],

I am writing to you as a constituent in [Your constituency/area] to express serious concerns regarding the upcoming implementation of the EU Migration and Asylum Pact on June 12th, 2026.

Under Protocol 21 of the Lisbon Treaty, Ireland possesses a clear legal right to opt out of EU legislation concerning immigration and asylum. I am alarmed by the Government's decision to waive this protocol and voluntarily opt-in to the Pact via the International Protection Act 2026.

By fully implementing this Pact, Ireland is handing over sovereignty regarding borders to Brussels and locking itself into a mandatory system that forces us to either accept set quotas of asylum seekers or face severe financial penalties.

Furthermore, aligning so rigidly with EU migration frameworks risks seriously undermining our Common Travel Area agreement with the United Kingdom.

With only days remaining before the June 11th deadline, the window to act is closing. I am calling on you, as my elected representative, to oppose the implementation of these measures and to publicly demand that Ireland exercises its Protocol 21 rights to retain full, independent control over our own border and asylum policies.

I will not vote for you again should you opt in.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Name] [Your Address / Eircode]

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@MagnitudeAFC @JustRaging01 I'd appreciate if you'd answer the question. No need to be so vulgar

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@MagnitudeAFC @JustRaging01 How am I racist? What gave you that idea?

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@MagnitudeAFC @JustRaging01 My sentence is perfect

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@MagnitudeAFC @JustRaging01 You're laughed at Nigeria lover

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@MagnitudeAFC @JustRaging01 You're Angolan

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@MagnitudeAFC @JustRaging01 Your mam hovered her vagina over the soil and dropped you onto it. You're African. Do you work and are you a patient in a GP surgery?

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@MagnitudeAFC @JustRaging01 Do you work in Ireland

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@olace0 @JustRaging01 What is my mindset

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@JustRaging01 So like London I meant the violence

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@olace0 @JustRaging01 It does now that I know some are carrying knives

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

If people have the words cam and crypto in their bio they are definitely trustworthy

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@olace0 @JustRaging01 How am I racist? Very serious allegation. Can you substantiate? I find your statement to be liabily defaming

[David @ExposeDavidOC]

@olace0 @JustRaging01 I'm not racist. Bob Marley was half white