@Solar_Sas@NightFawnArt@LovelyLaurenOG Why should non artists care about human made art if AI can outpace us someday? You literally do not answer this question in the entire 17 minute video when I would argue it is one of the most important and damning discussions that SHOULD HAVE been in your video
@Solar_Sas@NightFawnArt@LovelyLaurenOG I sadly did. You should use outlines btw- your writing is ass. It’s no wonder the ai script you generated was, from your perspective ‘not great but not awful’
@bugmeyer@Chichis_place Realizing Solar Sands is getting cooked by a confident and successful artist who cares for the craft leaves a delightful taste in my mouth (much like how the eggs would)
@spycattorney@jkbmyi (I say this bc Pilaf through Buu IS the story of dragon ball in its entirety. A lot of material after that is a ‘choose your adventure’ type of timeline)
@spycattorney@jkbmyi this watch order makes no sense bc it means you basically did not finish the OG dragon ball story- you just skipped the second half of the series bc you are familiar with it through osmosis 😭😭😭
@NightFawnArt@Solar_Sas@LovelyLaurenOG The video essay he created that he used to outrage farm distinctly makes no arguments that aren’t an ass-pull that contradicts points he’s making now. This is definitely because he uses money as the framing device for speaking about ai rather than focusing on the ARTISTIC ASPECTS
@NightFawnArt@Solar_Sas@LovelyLaurenOG Solar Sands is making his stance clear that he just flat out does not respect art. The last video he put out is a doomer piece about how AI will probably get better than us someday with no real counter arguments. He can’t answer the question of “why should people prefer art to ai
@NightFawnArt@LovelyLaurenOG Ok people automatically don’t like AI art thats fine I get that but every now and then I’ll see an AI art piece that’s interesting to me. Y’all can’t facts and logic me into thinking that an AI artwork isn’t pretty because it’s AI. It’s just my opinion.
@Arkiuz_clyne@Solar_Sas THIS!!!! I watched the video (unfortunately) and he admits to researching off of “lived experience on earth” (meaning his research is anecdotal at best) while also admitting he doesn’t use an outline for his video essay-esque content.
Guy who built his career on "critiquing" art seems to still not have figured out why art is made.
It's not a competition to make the most impressive looking thing, it's a way to express yourself.
If you use AI to substitute that - you're not making art,you're placing an order.
Self proclaimed "art critique" who made a career out of bullying your little sisters macaroni art reveals he only has the surface level understanding of art and can't engage with it on a deeper level other than "it looks good"
I'm sorry but when artists go like "my art is better than this AI slop" and then post art that's not like super impressive it's just really embarrassing.
My critique of Super is that it follows up the story of the Pilaf through Buu saga pretty poorly. The series leaned heavily into unlocking new transformations and battles over narrative (cough cough Goku Black arc) and it just makes for an inconsistent experience.