@ctilley79@r666ley I completely understand the want for a PvE mode that people are calling for. I do. I’m a huge PvE nut myself. I just think it changes the mode to a looter shooter at that point.
@ctilley79@r666ley The problem with that logic though is if you remove PvP you remove the true sense of danger, the element of surprise and unknowing when you may run into a player. That danger is what brings the suspense and element of danger to them. You change the game entirely
@StoneMountain64 Disappointed when they announced this. The 2nd most recent test they did was leaps and bounds better than the first. Sad to see it going away though.
@ForwardLeaks 4 is a hell of a lot better than the 6 we had in the beta. I’ll take what we can get. Coming across 6 man squads was basically a guaranteed death if you were solo or duo.
@dkdynamite1 The games not even out and people are already looking for controversial issues. Why don’t we just wait for the game to launch and enjoy it instead of causing controversy just for the sake of controversy
@GrayZoneWarfare Excited for more GZ updates but the game desperately NEEDS a stamina revamp or some sort of stamina progression/conditioning system. The stamina system that’s been in since launch up until now is awful.
@JGODYT This is good. This is one reason I think so many people enjoyed Plunder. It'll also push more people into DMZ which again is good. One could even see this as them having confidence in DMZ
@mrtigerdiesel@geekypastimes I got voice chat suspended multiple times during Warzone and my prox/voice chat was DISABLED. Would love to hear how that’s possible when I wasn’t even using it. Their voice chat moderation is pathetic
@geekypastimes If I get more than 70 hours worth of enjoyment and fun which I know I will from it, it’s worth it plus all the countless memories that’ll come from it. I easily put hundreds of hours into the DMZ beta and it was barebones. This should be a lot more from the looks of it
@JGODYT JGOD, I like and agree with a lot of your content but this I have to respectfully disagree with. I don't see how an extra character slot is "P2W". I haven't seen any reasonable or logical arguments to justify calling an extra character slot as P2W.