New- GT Basketball- Pastner v bell: Man convicted over false accusations vs. Pastner
An Arizona judge has convicted a man of orchestrating a plan to falsely accuse Georgia Tech basketball coach Josh Pastner of sexually assaulting a woman in a hotel… https://t.co/5KLwxHQIlg
Harvey Weinstein claims the trial judge allowed unfair testimony in previous trial; conviction appeal to be heard in New York's highest court
https://t.co/LeJ0V8zjYb
'Sir Cliff Richard said he will 'never get over' false abuse claims'
"I don’t think I’ll ever be over it. You can’t press the delete button in the brain. It’s just always there", he said.
#FalseAllegations
https://t.co/9xQekTa4BP @MailOnline
New video with me and @NeubergerLaw talking about the "New Rules" of evidence now that Canada's Supreme Court has deemed it constitutional. Massive risk of wrongful convictions but SCC is all about increasing conviction rates: https://t.co/cy36m68ryb via @YouTube
@AlanBra15552677 "Freeze" response is based on theory of "tonic immobility" attributed to animal predator defense.The theory has been co-opted by pseudo-neuro biologists who write papers for radical feminist groups interested in ensuring males accused of SA have no defense.https://t.co/l46NPjgDk3
AUSTRALIA: New NSW legislation cripples falsely accused defense: "The changes to existing NSW laws ensure a victim of a sexual activity that "does not say or do anything to communicate consent" will be evidence of non-consent." #FalseAllegations#Consent
https://t.co/6aJkAwahlh
The so-called "freeze" response is often the go-to for false accusers who willingly participated in the sexual encounter but later "changed their minds" due to the need to cover up or to get revenge. More NSW courts will accept this lie, leaving the accused with no other defence.
"...grey areas that had arisen in sexual offence trials about whether an accused's belief that consent existed was actually reasonable, and about how to recognise the common "freeze" response, where a person freezes in fear and cannot communicate their lack of consent."
CANADA: Two opposing opinion pieces in the Globe & Mail about the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling on how defendants can no longer 'surprise' accusers with evidence. First op-ed by defence lawyers: ...1/2
1/ Just chilling and so typical of wrongful convictions - still happening daily.
'It should never have happened': How everyone turned a blind eye to Alan Hall's wrongful conviction https://t.co/6Xanrie0nx
@LegalAidAlberta @AlbertaJSG @QB_Alberta
@NeubergerLaw It should be law for the media to report when such acquittals occur. And to edit original articles announcing charges with acquittal updates.
Congratulations @NeubergerLaw for rescuing Dr. Amir Haydarian from a lifetime of untold misery.
The Crown conceded there were serious concerns with the credibility of the main complainant.
All 15 counts were withdrawn. 👏
#FalseAllegations
https://t.co/Z4ZG1ENgDb
New Zealand: Woman jailed after a year-long campaign of #falseallegations against her ex-lover.
Judge: "There was a high level of premeditation, sophistication, and planning involved in the offending."
https://t.co/sCdhmyO6X3