@corn724142@DoctorTurtleboy It’s pretty clear: Element 1- the victims were witnesses in a court proceeding; Element 2 - he harassed them; Element 3 - his conduct evinced an intent to impede or interfere with a court proceeding or was retaliation against witness for participating
@Guru65Talk@realjustsully Another king of non sequiturs. Penders being an apparent racist, has nothing to do with anything. I bet if you dug into Jimmy Sullivan you’d find the same, but it’s not really relevant.
@CuraFiguraForma Probable cause that Karen killed John was established in court long ago, it just wasn’t established beyond reasonable doubt. The civil case will determine whether or not the probable cause standard is met in that context. If she wins civilly, then it’s truly over.
@1_and_only_Wade@netflix Why should this woman, who lost both her parents and uncle tragically, not have the right to express her opinions on what happened without fear of reprisal? People have a right to disagree with her, but disparaging and/or attacking her would be a most despicable act.
@jenny3xln The data is the data. It shows his phone out of the vehicle at approx 12:32 , she reversed (seconds later the phone stopped moving), left and was back at his house between 12:36 and 12:37. She was never waiting for him
@BigDaddyjr911 Did the Feds call the Adelsons to inform they wouldn’t be charged and the investigation was closed, then allow their attorneys to proclaim in open court that they were authorized to say so, without any correction from the Feds? ThE FeDs ArE CoMiNg……never let go of Karen’s scam
@MTM126scoop@LalasLandTC It’s not too late for the CW to indict for murder and, strategically, they have the benefit of seeing how the fed trial played out. I would agree with appointing a special prosecutor.
@KristinaRex I believe he did it, but he had experts testify that the injuries could have been suicide, so only need 1 to believe that’s reasonable doubt. Juries, just like in the Read case, give too much weight to these hired gun defense experts
@DixieNormu95224 Why would anyone object to a search of their curtilage, unless they did something wrong? Obviously, Alberts did nothing wrong so didn’t object. Why would police waste time on the house when no one, including KR said he went inside. Karen concocted that scheme months later.
@CuraFiguraForma As someone who believes Karen did it, there is no way to label the judgment as a loss for Karen. Given the MSP wording, the most I can say is that the consent to judgment is merely an acknowledgment that Proctor is a POS who wrongfully texted or shared information about Karen