The outcome of the Cattanach v. City of St. Paul case will determine whether data requesters (who in many instances do not suffer monetary damages from the government's improper withholding of data) can use the “exemplary damages” provision to penalize governmental misconduct.
Cattanach argued that “exemplary damages” are available without a showing of actual damages, and are available even to those who have suffered “nominal” damages from a government entity’s “willful” violation of the Data Practices Act.
In its briefing, the City of Saint Paul argued that “exemplary damages” are only available to persons who have suffered “actual” (i.e., monetary) damages.
Cattanach’s case was the first time a Minnesota court had awarded exemplary damages to a data requester, despite the remedy being available since the 1970s.
At the district court level, Judge Patrick Diamond awarded exemplary damages to data requester Robert Cattanach, in response to failures by the City of Paul to provide data in accordance with the terms of the Data Practices Act (Minnesota’s “open records” law).
The Forum for Constitutional rights joined an amici brief in the consolidated appeals related to the Trump executive orders targeting law firms
https://t.co/MZqEK7IBao
The records were released in response to a Data Practices Act request filed by the Forum for Constitutional Rights and Government Accountability (FCR) on January 26, 2026.
On April 7th, the City of Minneapolis released police and fire records related to the shooting of Minneapolis resident Alex Pretti by federal agents. Pretti was shot on January 24th, 2026 by agents participating in “Operation Metro Surge."
The Forum for Constitutional Rights joins amici brief in series of consolidated cases related to Trump administration executive orders targeting law firms
https://t.co/MZqEK7IBao