@lotion_fra28654@Bike_and_Bow @jamesd_graham Unequivocally false. 46% of people in social housing in London are economically inactive.
Source: https://t.co/nsMEqxIJ5m
@IwanDoherty98@pastasnack_e what Russell group (or quality equivalent) is accepting BBB or lower anyway?? If you are not bright enough to get that in A levels it is unlikely you are adding value at Uni.
@BenjaminGilbert@wehuntthesick@gary_worden@devonviews Interior designers pay is dictated by a free market, if 90k is the equilibrium that their pay settles on then so be it. The government intervening to place train drivers salaries at 70k is not natural and should it be left to a free market would not be that.
@Aguy1357@jasebyjason what an utterly ridiculous comment - UK GDP per capita is 3rd world level without London. they subsidise the rest of the country.
@ChrisDa33445506@JamesWi84409921@BladeoftheS the 1% make up 30% of all income tax receipts? they literally subsidise everyone else in the country - seems like they’re doing a pretty good job of paying.
@martynw69278154 @Super7Coach @MahyarTousi It very clearly proves your baseless assertion that the increasingly hostile climate towards HNWI is causing them to leave. Besides, Reece James is our club captain - but your mental acuity is clearly lacking so I would not expect you to know that.
@martynw69278154 @Super7Coach @MahyarTousi they are fella👍 - the notion that you think you can dictate whether I am or am not a supporter is laughable. you are clearly a sad envious man who wishes to drag those more successful than him down to compensate for his glaring lack of success - go and make something of yourself
@martynw69278154 @Super7Coach @MahyarTousi no shortage of countries who are very welcoming to those making >180k a year fella and are willing to let them spend it as they wish . commitment to the UK far less than before, so many banking/consulting jobs can be done remotely.
@BladeoftheS Imagine being bright enough to make a living purely from buying and selling shares (99% people cannot dream of making large returns from retail trading) just for >47% of it to be taken. Who are you to dictate what is and isn’t work?
@martynw69278154 @Super7Coach @MahyarTousi As they already pay far, far more as a % income, any more burden they would begin to leave and as they are such big net contributors due to likely not using public services themselves would leave public finances royally fucked.
@martynw69278154 @Super7Coach @MahyarTousi Proportionally that is unequivocally correct? What you define as “fair” is a value judgement hence not able to be tested. I agree that the 1% should pay more than others, but bearing in mind how much they already pay, is it not unfair to ask them to pay more?
@martynw69278154 @Super7Coach @MahyarTousi If we are discussing the original point posed - being that those more fortunate should pay their fair share, then the impact of the tax rise is irrelevant as they are already paying 30x more than their fair share hence any extra will exacerbate the existing unfairness.