@Nikki92395484 This is a debate I've been having with someone I know. I keep hearing the same argument you make, but have not seen anything proving it. It's always just people commenting on other people's comments. Can you share links that show the real data?
@Seanster_1 @E_S_O_T_ERIC @CountryFirstRep Because you and I don't agree on who we vote for? Why does that turn into name calling? Too much "Agree with me or you're a $&@!" these days.
@truthsocialx@AccountableGOP @OversightPR Did you not see "NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THIS CLAIM"? I can make up crazy theories too and call the police, but it doesn't make them true. :)
@grimble8675309 @E_S_O_T_ERIC @CountryFirstRep It's not a binary decision. I'm a Republican and believe in most of what the party stands for. But I refuse to vote for a narcissistic, divisive, grifter. Harris will be better for this country and its place in the world, even if I don't agree with all of her policies.
@grimble8675309 @E_S_O_T_ERIC @CountryFirstRep I'm voting for my morals. Just against my party. Trump is all about Trump and simply says what will gets the most applause. Remember promises like "Mexico is going to pay for the wall."? :)
@E_S_O_T_ERIC @CountryFirstRep I don't know about the "dishonest..." part, but I too am a Republican and proud American. Hence, "not Trump". Maybe visit #repsforharris for more info.
@PatriotXV11@EndWokeness I guess that cross in your sig is for decoration? John 13:34-35. "A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another."
@PatriotXV11@elonmusk The only thing Trump cares about is himself, so IS a threat to a lot that Republicans like me believe in. As such, I'll be voting "not Trump". Wait until election time and see how many of us there are. However, I do agree that shooting is not the answer. Voting is.
@BrownJeylani One member of the American public here. No it didn't. It made him look like a petulant child, short on facts, and unable to do anything but name calling.
@GymJammer4ever@Bubblebathgirl I'm a Republican who's fact-checked enough of Trump's statements to see through his lies. I flipped over to Fox News immediately after the debate to get the conservative take, and even they admitted he got smoked.
@themagaking@mmpadellan This kind of post is a bot. No human being that watched that debate can make that statement. Even from a foreign government that's trying to interfere. :)
@oldscole76@2Gremlins_Iluv@guypbenson It was not rehearsed. That's just how intelligent people speak. They can think quickly and speak articulately. After watching tonight, I realized that if you've seen nothing but Trump, you would not be aware of that.
@pugster92475174@glennkirschner2 I'm sorry to disappoint you, but Lindell is bleeding himself dry. He's had YEARS to provide actual proof of fraud, and yet all he's done is show screens of confusing networkspeak and tell people it means something. As a network engineer, I can promise you it doesn't.
@TheTrumpParty@RpsAgainstTrump Mike Lindell proved no such thing. That's why he now owes $5 million dollars. His "experts" are simply milking him for as much money as they can by feeding him technical details that seem plausible if you're not a computer person.
https://t.co/SjfEtOmGIm
@justicebrandt1@JewelsJonesLive@KariLake There was no fraud. Rather, Kari discovered early on that people will actually send her money if she keeps claiming that there was. Her losses aren't because of cowardly or compromised judges, but because Kari has yet to provide actual evidence of anything illegal.