Under C-22, any business that sends email may fit the definition of an Internet Service Provider!
It may be a drafting error, but the Minister should not be able to order a bakery install surveillance.
Even the Intelligence Commissioner is concerned.
Committee is back Tuesday.
Important:
Under C-22, the Commissioner of Intelligence would have to sign off on Ministerial Orders to instal back door surveillance equipment.
So I asked the kind Justice Noël, what percent of government orders he approves on average?
85% ! 🤯
We need judicial oversight.
🚨EU plans VPN crackdown: New age ID system “cannot be bypassed” via VPNs.
Couldn’t stop illegal migration, but suddenly goes full North Korea on controlling what Europeans read online.
I promise I am not joking...
This is Canada's spaceport.
Last month, the federal government paid $200 million to a company called Maritime Launch Services to lease it for 10 years.
🚨 Exposing California's corrupt "Stop Nick Shirley Act", instead of going after the fraudsters California is now going after the people exposing the fraud.
This bill AB 2624 will:
- Criminalize journalists with misdemeanors, $10,000 fines, imprisonment, and content takedown
- Let immigrant based NGOs' funding be confidential
- Take away freedom of the press from journalists
- Protect any "immigration support services" information from being public (healthcare, legal services, etc)
This bill was created by the Attorney General's WIFE Mia Bonta to stop fraud from being exposed. Please like and share this video everywhere! By trying to silence and intimidate journalists, they are trying to hide the truth from you. EXPOSE ALL THE FRAUD.
Destroying the @InternetArchive's @WayBackMachine would be the equivalent of the burning of the Library of Alexandria - one of the worst losses of knowledge in history.
Media giants are now threatening to do this.
We can't let this happen.
Pass it on.
UNCOVERED: Buried in a seemingly mundane fisheries announcement, the Government of Canada hands control of Vancouver to Musqueam Indian Band; radically undermining property rights in one of Canada’s largest and most populated metropolitan regions.
https://t.co/ESspGK0MWG
In addition to the concerns I raised earlier, another serious problem with Bill C-16 is that it risks targeting people living with mental health conditions who experience suicidal ideations.
Bill C-16 would create Criminal Code section 264.01(2)(b) which says that a person who threatens to harm themselves may be treated as engaging in a “pattern of coercive or controlling behaviour” toward an intimate partner.
This risks treating suicidal thoughts as a criminal act rather than a mental-health crisis. For people living with mental illness, statements about self-harm are often cries for help, not attempts to control someone else.
Turning those expressions into criminal evidence based on another person’s psychological discomfort risks further stigmatizing mental illness, discouraging people from seeking help, and replacing care with punishment.
Do you think the government should criminalize everyday interactions in your home with your family? If not, you should read Bill C-16.
The bill creates new offences (Criminal Code Section 264.01), which are deeply concerning for normal, loving family interactions, based on a “pattern of coercive or controlling conduct,” even when no violence, threats, or illegal acts occur.
It criminalizes a pattern of otherwise lawful and often common behaviour that may later be perceived as threatening by an intimate partner.
That means ordinary family interactions could be re-interpreted as criminal after the fact.
Examples include:
- Asking a spouse where they are after they said they’d be home
-Expressing concern about excessive drinking
-Disagreeing about finances or spending
-Asking a partner not to give children junk food
- Raising concerns about time away from family
- Setting household boundaries or expectations
These are not crimes. They are part of marriage, parenting, and shared responsibility.
This does not diminish the seriousness of coercive control in genuinely abusive relationships. But criminal law should target clear abuse and violence, which are already addressed in law.
Bill C-16, as written, opens the door to police intervention in the homes of ordinary families.
A week ago I said the Liberals will ban @X. They denied it.
Now they’re back to “investigating it” which is government lingo for “give us enough time for the story to die down, then we’ll ban it.”
Liberals censor speech.
Conservatives support free speech. Simple as that, folks.
The state broadcaster is under fire after the CBC censored Prime Minister Mark Carney’s controversial “new world order” remark during a broadcast of his speech from China.
https://t.co/69XkFDUQCz
From inside Iran:
"This is probably my last message.
The regime is going door to door, confiscating satelite dishes and Starlink. Just like in the early 2000s.
Be our voice."