Faith Quintero

Wrote Loaded Blessings. Words in places. Values people, animals, environment. pro-peace = pro-Israel

[Faith Quintero @FaithQuintero7]

As news emerges that terrorists who took part in the October 7 massacre worked for UNRWA...reposting my @BESA_Center article on how the United Nations, Amnesty International & Human Rights Watch have been deceiving the public and laundering terrorism.

https://t.co/9YMg5QinL5

[Faith Quintero @FaithQuintero7]

@RuprajSengupta Happy belated Diwali!

[David M Friedman @DavidM_Friedman]

Here’s an article from the New York Times in 1933. To all the Jews who voted for @NYCMayor or @AbdulElSayed or the other avowed Jew haters on the ballot this week, please read the article and think hard about what you have done and how you may be contributing to a repeat of a very dark history.

[Shoshana🦁🌞🇸🇨🪬🇮🇷📟 @Shoshana51728]

Dear dhimmi Jews who continue to vote for IslamoNazis like el Sayed:

Because ya'll are so fucking stupid , I have to waste my time on twitter educating your dumb asses.

In 1934 a dumb fuck Jew similar to yourselves named Max Naumann tried to ingratiate himself and his equally retarded followers with the Nazis. They created an organization called the Association of German National Jews . They were patriotic Germans who had fought for Germany during WW1 and thought the Nazis would accept them if they jumped on the Nazi band wagon.

Max Naumann's words should send chills down your spines ( if ya'll actually had spines, which you clearly lack). This is what Max argued:

“We live in a time of transition that cannot last forever. We must distinguish between three kinds of Jews–Those who have lived long in Germany and have the feeling that they have always been German, the assimilated, and the Zionists. The great mistake was to make no distinction between these three groups. The solution of the Jewish question can come only through a ruthless inequality of rights between them. There were 500,000 Jews in Germany. Now there are probably still 450,000. Of these only 150,000 are capable of proving absolute patriotism. They alone should be fully included in the national community of Germany. The other 300,000 must be treated as aliens, that means that a beginning must be made to deprive them of their German citizenship. They may have the right to carry on their business in Germany, but the least attempt to interfere in its internal policy would result in their expulsion from the country, against whose laws of hospitality they would have offended.”

Get it? Separating the 'good Jews' from the 'bad Jews'...

Guess what happened to good old Max and his followers...exactly. They were imprisoned and murdered.

Wake the fuck up!

[Mason @masonq33]

Came to Dizengoff in Philly and this boycott is having the opposite effect. There’s no tables for walkins!

[Mason @masonq33]

Damn, I only have an hour and half here and couldn’t get Mac Mart or K’far Cafe in time either. A good problem to have!

[Orli Peter @orlipeter]

Exit is a gripping, beautifully crafted film that combines psychological depth with remarkable storytelling. It will stay with you long after the credits roll.

[Melissa Braunstein @slowhoneybee]

Oh, so now it can be said.

[Canary Mission @canarymission]

MUST WATCH: El-Sayed’s pal Hasan Piker and Nick Fuentes. You really can’t tell ’em apart!

On Black people:
Fuentes - “I don’t wanna live around black people.”
Piker - “I don’t give a f*ck what black people care about.”

On America:
Fuentes - “This is a godless country. I hate it.”
Piker - “America deserved 9/11, dude.”
Piker - “Motherf*ck the Constitution and motherf*ck this country.”

On Jews:
Fuentes - “They’re ugly. They’re dysgenic.”
Piker - “The most inbred”

Same hate. Same contempt. But apparently one comes with a progressive exemption.

[Kathryn Paisner @KathrynPaisner]

Can you imagine the @washingtonpost publishing this article, today?

They should run it again, but they probably won’t, because they’re cowards.

[Mason @masonq33]

A lot of people seem to think the Muslim Brotherhood is “scary” because it has the word Muslim in it. But that doesn’t explain why a bunch of Muslim-majority countries (Jordan, Saudis Arabia, the UAE, etc.) have designated it a terror organization.

[Mark Dubowitz @mdubowitz]

Got to hand it to Qatar: when it comes to buying influence and corrupting democracies, they’re impressively nonpartisan. Left, right, radical left, radical right — no ideology is off-limits, no political camp beyond reach. Their only loyalty: their own interests and the advancement of Islamism. Their greatest success is eroding public trust in our democratic institutions from every direction.

[Faith Quintero @FaithQuintero7]

@masonq33 Or about Khamenei.

[Mason @masonq33]

A harsher statement for Haley Stevens than he’s ever made about the Muslim
Brotherhood… telling

[Alison Jayne Wilson - Filmmaker @FilmmakerAlison]

I made EXIT in 2022, it’s still proving to be a vital, educational tool. The awards help too but mean nothing unless you reach communities. Please share & it’s free now on Prime Video UK @PrimeVideo
#documentary

[ד״ר עינת וילף Dr. Einat Wilf @EinatWilf]

The vote count is complete. The Reservists and Economic Party received the support of approximately 152,000 voters, who appear to have come in roughly equal numbers from both political “blocs,” and from socioeconomic clusters reflecting the full political, economic, and identity spectrum of those who rushed to the front lines to defend the country on October 7. In doing so, we became the only party in these elections whose agenda and voters alike transcended the division into political “blocs.”

But it is possible that, despite not being represented in the Knesset, the election results will nevertheless allow us to achieve the very thing for which we sought to enter it. The results hold enormous political potential. Precisely because neither side got what it wanted, an opportunity has opened up to form the government Israel needs: a broad, centrist Zionist government that will finally begin confronting the country's fundamental challenges.

What do the results tell us?

Netanyahu's coalition does not have a majority to return in its current composition. That is over.

The change bloc does not have a majority to form a government without relying on parties and members of Knesset who hold explicitly antizionist and Palestinianist positions.

And it seems it will take time to fully grasp the significance of the scale of political support for anti-Zionist Arab and ultra-Orthodox parties, especially in a scenario of their full voter mobilization. The possibility of political cooperation between anti-Zionist Arab and ultra-Orthodox parties, and the emergence of an “antizionist bloc” that increasingly places the interests of these two groups above the shared Zionist interest, represents a strategic threat to the future of the State of Israel. For Zionist parties to rely on anti-Zionist parties in order to defeat a Zionist political rival is dangerous behavior.

And here lies the paradox: an outcome that makes almost nobody happy individually could turn out to be an excellent result for the State of Israel and Zionism. Precisely because neither side can get everything it wants, the necessity of working together has emerged.

The right government for Israel at this moment is a government of Likud, Yashar, Lieberman, and Bennett. A broad, centrist Zionist government, without the ultra-Orthodox and Arab parties, and also without the less centrist Zionist parties.

Such a government could, if it chose to, commit to preserving the existing legal situation, under which there are no longer any arrangements granting exemptions from service and the law currently in force is the Defense Service Law. It could ensure that state services and public-sector positions are reserved for those who serve and defend the country. It could guarantee state Zionist education, in Hebrew, for all Israeli children. And it could put an end to the economic mechanisms through which Israel's welfare state has, for decades, encouraged draft evasion and separation from the Zionist enterprise. (And it certainly wouldn't hurt to lower the electoral threshold to encourage Zionist Arab and Zionist ultra-Orthodox political representation.)

Such a government could confront the enormous diplomatic and security challenges ahead, finally begin working to dismantle Palestinianism at home and abroad, and return Israel to a Zionist and productive path.

There are no serious security or economic differences between the parties of Netanyahu, Eisenkot, Bennett, and Lieberman that justify continued paralysis or another election. They have far more in common than our political discourse allows us to see. If they wanted to, they could form an excellent government.

But for that to happen, both sides would have to give something up.

Netanyahu cannot insist on preserving every component of his current coalition and expect everyone else simply to join it. The election results neither allow nor justify that.

Conversely, the change bloc cannot insist on boycotting Netanyahu at the price of relying on antizionist and Palestinianist forces.

The danger now is that, instead of seizing the opportunity, both sides will choose escalation, which could look like this:

Netanyahu will entrench himself in a coalition that lacks a majority, while the other side will use its parliamentary majority to pass confrontational legislation and paralyze the government. Each side will respond with further escalation, and Israel will find itself in a prolonged political and institutional crisis, precisely when it needs a functioning government more than ever.

This is exactly where we wanted to play a political role.

We did not seek to be the kingmaker who determines who becomes prime minister. We sought to be the spearhead for establishing a broad, centrist Zionist government. A political force capable of standing up to either side that refused to compromise, and making it clear that refusal carries a price.

This was our message throughout the campaign: What, not who.

Israel is a parliamentary, coalition-based democracy. The prime minister, as the English name suggests, is the first among ministers, not a president and not a king. The identity of the prime minister matters, but the composition of the coalition and the policies it advances matter far more.

Therefore, the question of who will be prime minister is secondary to the question of what kind of governing coalition we will have.

Will it be a government that continues subsidizing draft evasion and separation from the rest of society, or one that restores service, Zionist education, and shared responsibility to the center of Israeli life? Will we continue postponing the confrontation with our fundamental problems, or will we seize the opportunity to halt processes that have been endangering our future for decades? These are the questions that truly matter. And if we fail to confront them now, the future price will be far higher — and the damage may not even be reversible.

We ran in these elections to change the direction in which Israel is heading. We had hoped to do so from within the Knesset, and we are disappointed that we will not be able to. But the results have created a genuine opportunity to achieve the very goal for which we embarked on this journey.

The responsibility now lies with the leaders who were elected. They can continue to entrench in political blocs that have led Israel into repeated election cycles and governments dominated by the extremes, or they can recognize that the new political reality requires them to do something different.

If a broad, centrist Zionist government is formed here, without the ultra-Orthodox and Arab parties, and finally begins confronting the fundamental questions facing the State of Israel, that will be the achievement we sought.

And that will be reward enough for us.

[Canary Mission @canarymission]

A far-left PAC ecosystem is working to reshape the Democratic party.

A closer look at these organizations reveal a worrying agenda and suspicious ties. 🧵

[Canary Mission @canarymission]

“The PACs that I'm a part of are winning a lot of races.”
“When I think about building power, I think about brothers like Abdul El-Sayed.”
“We are building political influence in cities across America.”

Linda Sarsour implies she’s pulling the strings behind super PACs supporting Abdul El-Sayed, Darializa Avila Chevalier, Adam Hamawy and several DSA candidates.

If that's true, what else is she hiding?

[Malka ✡︎🇺🇸🇮🇱ActionsAffectWhoWeAre @PavdWHrtNotGold]

Understand the decades it took for "progressives" to have some success in shifting the Democractic party to the socialist left! And now we are in an unsafe place.

A hard lesson we have not learned, those against democracy, the Jewish people and Israel have been at this for so very long. Not a word of their msging has changed for decades. Bernie Sanders is who they coalesed around. And PDA takes pride that they convinced Sanders to run for President in 2013, for the 2016 general election.

Eventually, as in years, more socialists orgs joined PDA. And now they are having serious and dangerous impacts on so many of our lives.

HUGE lessons, they played chess while so many of us were playing checkers. Another critical lesson, so many of us raised concern for decades, only to lose support, our jobs. As a friend said on October 7 and after, this is the worse 'i told you so' ever!

Please pay attention!!!! And, don't use my research withoug my permission and without crediting me.

Below is an excerpt from the ED of PDA. While he was working at PDA is was also working at a 501 (c) 3 public radio station from 2002 until 2018. And he still contributes to the station and network.
Many of you know "Democracy Now!", which is the flagship show for the same network.

"In all of these respects, Rashida Tlaib continues the 13th District’s tradition of sending a progressive visionary to Washington.  However, history has shifted. Left-progressives are no longer so marginalized. In fact, millions of Americans are raising their voices, demanding exactly the type of systemic change as Rashida and the Squad.
However, radical change doesn’t come easy. Does the new progressive left have realistic plans to remedy America’s endemic social ills, and the dramatic impact they have on places like Michigan’s 13th? Aren’t these the product of decades of dis-investment? Wouldn’t a reversal of this trend require a wholesale social and economic re-organization of society?
The answers to those questions are Yes, Yes, and No – as long as true left progressives like Rashida Tlaib keep on winning elections.
Rashida Tlaib is the real deal, an exceptional public servant on all fronts.
I’ve had the privilege of co-hosting an event with Rashida Tlaib. Not surprisingly, Rashida faced challenging questions. She handled them with grace, a welcoming sense of inclusivity; and still made strong persuasive arguments throughout.
I’ve also participated in an activist action with Rashida, and witnessed her make a powerful presentation at the Congressional Progressive Caucus Center on the People’s Housing Platform, a legislative initiative to guarantee housing as a human right.
There’s no denying that Rashida has tremendous charisma (with a million-watt smile), yet she is as down-to-earth as anyone you could hope to meet. (Want proof? Check out her interview with Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman a few days after her election to Congress). Not surprisingly, Rashida has been very accessible to the members of her district these past two years. She is truly of the community, by the community, for the community.
As such, Rashida Tlaib fully understands how much needs to be done to lift Michigan’s 13th into the realm of middle class prosperity. She also understands the centrality of government policy for achieving that end. After all, the state determines both society’s laws and the parameters of the economy (including those of the market) in all industrialized/technological 21st Century societies. The contemporary American right-wing fully grasps this, hence their astronomical expenditures on elections, and their voter disenfranchisement shenanigans, etc.  Somehow, this truth is lost on a significant portion of the left, but understood fully by Rashida and the Squad.
Thus, these young radical Congresswomen occupy a unique and central role in current politics. They share a social critique with the millions of largely young Americans who poured into the streets following the murder of George Floyd, demanding not just an end to murderous racist policing, but to the entirety of American structural racism. Rashida is now one of the two lead sponsors, along with Ayanna Pressley. of the Movement For Black Lives-endorsed Breathe Act; which calls for the divestment of Federal funds from policing and incarceration, and the investment of those funds into new, alternative approaches to public safety, and into building “healthy, sustainable, and equitable communities for all people.”
We do not know with certainty where those millions of protestors fall on the ideological spectrum; but all evidence suggests they not only loathe the perpetuation of America’s institutionalized, structural racism; but understand its direct relationship to much of America’s endemic social pathologies.  There is a voracious appetite in the land for justice, and for building an anti-racist society with more shared prosperity.
Among our elected officials, only left-progressives will pursue this agenda. Without a major re-setting of government policy – comparable in scale to FDR in 1933 (to the left) and Reagan in the 1980s (to the right) – America’s endemic social pathologies will surely persist. The current slate of well-known left progressive programs – such as Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, living wage and full employment mandates, and now the Breathe Act – would provide a solid foundation for such a necessary and seismic shift .
Rashida Tlaib will pursue these ends and more. She is a leader for our times. We need Rashida to win re-election.
We can build a just, equitable and sustainable society in America, but we need political power to get there. A septuagenarian socialist and The Squad have established a beachhead inside the halls of power. If they hold that ground, and continue to expand their ranks, a sense of real possibility will continue to spread across the land.
(So, now it’s time to mobilize for Rashida! Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) has officially endorsed Rashida Tlaib for Congress. Please support our efforts to re-elect Rashida by donating or by signing up to phone bank.)
A loss by Rashida would be devastating not only for progressives, but also for Palestinians and those of us who support Palestinian human and political rights. Rashida is, of course, Palestinian-American and she’s an outspoken advocate for the Palestinian cause; which, of course, puts her at odds with the U.S. foreign policy establishment. While the Israeli Government, President Trump, and Republicans in Congress have all leveled attacks against Rashida, she has remained an unwavering voice of reason; reiterating principled positions backed up by facts.  Support for the Palestinian cause is growing in America; and Rashida is a great spokesperson for the movement.
One more reason why the world will be a better place if Rashida Tlaib wins on August 4th; in what I consider the most important Congressional primary of 2020."

[Faith Quintero @FaithQuintero7]

Congressman Ritchie Torres is one of the few truly principled and effective politicians.

If only there were more like him to reclaim the Democratic Party.

[Ritchie Torres @RitchieTorres]

Since September 3, 2026, my colleagues and I in the Congressional Bronx Delegation have been calling on the Trump Administration to exempt the Bronx from Medicaid paperwork requirements.

I am proud to report that the Bronx has received the waiver, preserving Medicaid coverage for 200,000 Bronx residents.

[Ritchie Torres @RitchieTorres]

FACT: The annual funding Israel receives from the US amounts to less than one-tenth of 1% of the federal budget. Less than 1/10th of 1%.

FACT: That annual funding would cover only a few hours of federal health care spending. A few hours.

Yet politicians who specialize in scapegoating would have you believe that Israel is responsible for America’s affordability crisis.

Like every form of scapegoating before it, it is a dangerous lie.