@JohnnyJanardan@Tractor2twitr_P@BhagwantMann@ArvindKejriwal There is no LAW barring it. Thats how parties n govt. run. One can have a dumb moral argument against it.
but people want accountability for what they voted for, for public deliveries, law n order etc etc.
narrative ke liye kuch bhi Karen it’s ok for parties not for citizens
@Tractor2twitr_P@BhagwantMann@ArvindKejriwal 2) corner them on lacks in education deliveranc, reality of propagated irrigation revolution, still visible drug issue and still seen corruption.
yeh do kodi ka sexist scandal manufactur karna is pathetic
@Tractor2twitr_P@BhagwantMann@ArvindKejriwal 1) This is literally the most non issue I have ever seen. They are allowed to Punjab ministers who have given it to team of the ruling party for purposes of propagating govt work n planning, by this logic cm should take zero party meeting etc at his residence as well.
@neilcybart Wearables would never cut it in my opinion. that’s why meta’s attempt seems extra bold. Because they have a broad line of wearable now n will have a watch soon to give with the display glasses.
for the ai device that listens to and sees everything . Something more Conspicuous
@neilcybart 1/ someone gets it , charm is not for kids. Pmf would obviously be tested when it arrives but I think we do need an ai native device which will be much smaller than phone And is not a wearable.
some use cases I can think of:
@neilcybart Basis of my thesis is if we assume ai assistants would be efficient n ubiquitous then we need easier access to them m treat them like assistants not apps
@neilcybart as soon as you fingerprint open it you see whats the status on your passport application you asked it to get done etc
4. authetication device for your assistant approvals, fingerprint n face scan for payments n sensitives comms