@DavidWa10370948@SurreyRoadCops@OpTutelage That’s a silly comment- think for a moment about the possible/likely consequences of an unlicensed driver in an uninsured car knocking down someone you care about or driving into your car/van/bike whatever. No it doesn’t stop violence against women or lock up real criminals but…
@simon_oakden@MatthewStadlen Simon, I’m not familiar with that term (unless it’s an autocorrect error) - could you tell me what a ”cat bird seat” is? Thank you
@xixa_notxixa @WorldByWolf@Nigel_Farage Me? I haven’t indicated that I support anyone or anything- I was querying calling a government minister “a terrorist”. Semantics not antisemitism.
@Rod__Mason@reformparty_uk Well, I can see how those ideas would appeal to some sections of society- but they are either impracticable or impossible under human rights laws. The problem for any world be dictator in our country are the courts and the people, but not in that order.
@bheaneire@JuliaHB1 I think it’s just utter madness; nonsense on stilts- is it for the benefit of men, women or people who are transgender and their acolytes? What a world we live in.
@carolvorders As lovely as you are, Carol, what’s your point? The money? The tax % ? Should he give his wealth away? Get divorced? Surely it’s whether he’s good at his job or not. He’s not, but his wealth has nothing to do with that- or do you know something?
@campers_moll @Katie_did1947 @Travis_in_Flint I think it was a civil trial so perhaps “the balance of probabilities” not “beyond reasonable doubt”? Not sure about American court system