Fanuilos #IStandWithJKRowling

#FeminismoNoVotaTraidores

[Fanuilos #IStandWithJKRowling @Fanuilos5]

Secret porn use is abusive. Here’s why. https://t.co/A0qKUD77je via @YouTube

[La Revuelta @LaRevuelta_TVE]

La humillación que sufrieron las mujeres SOLO por jugar al fútbol no tiene defensa ni perdón

Solo eran unas niñas de 14 años queriendo jugar al fútbol. Todo nuestro apoyo y reconocimiento a las pioneras y a todas aquellas que están por llegar. Son presente, pasado y futuro

[Barbijaputa @Barbijaputa]

Qué soledad tan absoluta la de las niñas y mujeres afganas. En Europa no las quieren ni para hacer campaña todos esos partidos que no paran de hablar de DDHH en otros temas.
https://t.co/gCJ6NeWx5k

[Patry Archy @PatryArchy2025]

Es tal la cantidad de hombres pederastas que violan bebés e intercambian material gráfico con otros hombres, q defender la legalización de la compraventa de bebés por gestación subrogada es una monstruosidad. Hay que estar muy mal de la cabeza para apoyar este negocio tan brutal

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

“It’s important to note that the current government is trying to dismiss this issue as a ‘culture war’ while they’re simultaneously trying to rebrand themselves as the party against misogyny, not connecting the dots that refusing to acknowledge what a woman is & cement women’s rights in law is an act of extreme misogyny”

[Selene Ruiz Shield @selenerushi]

Insoportable cómo se está minimizando el que una cría de 12 años haya sido manoseada por un grupo de niños "porque son pequeños y no ha habido penetración". La cultura de la violación comienza en la infancia pero luego nos preguntamos por qué llevamos 43 feminicidios en 2026

[Genevieve Gluck @WomenReadWomen]

SPAIN:

A record 37.5% of 2026 femicide victims had filed prior complaints or requested protection orders.

The figures mark the highest percentage since tracking began in 2003.

[Miss Handle 🍁 @venus_envious]

@liberal_party

[Problem Oriented @ish_chel]

I'm a woman, mother, daughter, sister, aunt, granddaughter, niece. These are my nominals.

[Rachael Wong @RachaelWongAus]

Only women can breastfeed. Saying so should not be controversial, and it should certainly not be treated as unlawful.

Yet Jasmine Sussex has been dragged through years of legal proceedings for raising legitimate concerns about male “chestfeeding” and infant safety.

Her case returns to QCAT today - and it's a chilling reminder of what happens when biological truth becomes punishable.

👉 Read more: https://t.co/WfhwjQyr3L

#IStandWithJasmineSussex #Auspol

[Daisy @DaizyZeeX]

FACT: Female victims who kill in SELF DEFENSE will spend an average of 15 years behind bars

Men who kill their female partners serve ,on average, between 2 and 6 years behind bars...

[Rapiegas @Rapiegas]

¿Cómo es posible que no tengamos datos de calidad desde la ley estatal? ¿Hay un copia y pega de las leyes autonómicas sin tener en cuenta no adaptarse a la realidad social asturiana?
Gracias a Isabel Esteva por comparecer.
#LeyLgtbiAsturias

[Edison V. Campos @Edison_vander]

Um homem de 25 anos mandou mensagem para uma menina de 13 anos.

"Oi, gatinha." "Meu sonho é ficar com você." "Seria uma honra tirar a virgindade dela."

O que ele não sabia: era a mãe quem respondia.

A mãe perguntou diretamente: "Isso não é pedofilia?"

Ele deu risada. E marcou o encontro.

Chegou lá — e encontrou a mãe.

Sete dias sem dormir. Conhecia o homem há 20 anos. Viu a filha crescer.

Ela bateu nele. Depois acionou a polícia, fez o boletim e entregou o celular como prova.

Ele foi à delegacia, prestou depoimento.

E foi embora. Não ficou preso.

Uma mãe passou 7 dias em colapso, montou uma operação, colheu as provas, entregou tudo — e o Estado soltou o homem na mesma noite.

Ela fez o trabalho da polícia, do MP e do judiciário.

E mesmo assim, não foi suficiente para mantê-lo atrás das grades.

[Cervixen of the Clitorians @cervixen]

The Gender-Critical or "TERF" Position is a materialist analysis of sex, gender, and women’s rights. It is not a theory of hatred toward trans-identified people. It is a claim about the importance of sex as a real, human, and materially significant category in law, language, medicine, safeguarding, sport, and feminism.

Trans activists often misrepresent the views of GC feminists, sex realists and TERFs becaue honesty would cause them to lose the argument.

The following is an attempt to represent my position as a gender critical, sex realist and radical feminist precisely so it is easier to see when that view is being intentionally misrepresented and/or understood by bad faith representatives of trans activism.

I know my own position better than anyone. Bad faith is presuming to tell me what my own position is in order to discredit me. That's worse than a strawman, and the main tactic of gender essentialist activism.

Here is my actual position: the only position I need to defend:

1. Sex is real and materially significant

Sex in human beings is not an identity, a feeling, a role, or a personality type. It is a reproductive and developmental category: male and female are the two human sex classes that are the means of human reproduction. Male is the sex class organized around the development of small, mobile gametes and female is the sex class organized around the development of large, immobile gametes.

This does not mean every person is fertile, typical, or currently capable of reproduction. Infertility, menopause, hysterectomy, castration, DSDs, injury, age, or illness do not erase sex. Sex is not a human performance and there is no standard for sex beyond teproductive role. Sex is a human condition and an innate, immutable attribute of the human body.

Gender-critical feminists reject the idea that sex is “assigned at birth” in the sense of being invented, guessed, or arbitrarily imposed by authority. In ordinary cases, sex is observed and recorded. Even in rare, extraordinary cases with ambiguous secondary sex characteristics, with modern instrumentation, the primary atrribute of sex is observable at the definitive level beyond the crude level of external genitalia at the cellular level.

2. Women are female human beings

In this framework, “woman” means an adult human female. “Girl” means a juvenile human female.

This definition does not depend on femininity, beauty, clothing, sexual behaviour, reproductive capacity, compliance, heterosexuality, or conformity to stereotypes. A woman can be masculine, feminine, lesbian, bisexual, heterosexual, celibate, infertile, disabled, old, young, gender-nonconforming, or medically atypical. She remains a woman because she is female.

The position is therefore not that women must look, act, dress, think, or feel a certain way. It is the opposite: women should be free from the sex-based stereotypes traditionally imposed on female people.

3. Gender is not sex

Radical feminism distinguishes sex from gender.
Sex refers to the embodied, biological male/female distinction.
Gender refers to the social roles, stereotypes, expectations, behaviours, and hierarchies imposed on people because of sex.
Gender-critical feminism does not seek to preserve gender roles. It seeks to abolish their coercive power.

A feminine male does not become female. A masculine female does not become male. No one should have to change sex category, medically alter their body, or adopt a new identity to be allowed to reject sexist expectations.

Continued...

[🇵🇸NELA🇸🇩🇨🇴 @MoronNela]

"Asaltaron la casa, mataron a mi marido y mis hijos, luego me agarraron, me cortaron por todo el cuerpo, me tiraron agua hirviendo y me quemaron. Luego me violaron 20 soldados, rebeldes del M23 de Ruanda".

Estas mujeres y niñas del Congo merecen tener voz, ni siquiera salen en las noticias y están pasando un infierno diario por la avaricia imperialista que ha creado un genocidio en el pais solo para saquearlo.

Si #Palestina es invisibilizada a diario en los medios, el #Congo directamente ya ni existe.

[Feministes de Catalunya @feministes_cat]

💔Hallan sin vida a la pequeña Lyhanna tras casi una semana de búsqueda.

El asesino es Jerome Barella, padre de su mejor amiga, un depredador sexual reincidente protegido por una justicia que falla sistemáticamente a las mujeres y a la infancia.

Acumulaba hasta 5⃣ denuncias por abusos sexuales a niñas.
❌En 2017, una madre presentó una denuncia tras enterarse de que su hija de 17 años mantenía una "relación" con Jérôme, de 30. El caso se archivó al determinarse que la relación era "consentida".
❌En 2021 lo despedieron de su trabajo en un instituto por "conducta inapropiada" hacia una niña.
❌En 2022, una niña de 15 años lo denunció por violaciones; el caso se cerró "por falta de pruebas".
❌En agosto de 2025, fue denunciado por violaciones reiteradas a una niña de 10 años.
9 meses después NI LE HABÍAN INTERROGADO.
❌Este mismo miércoles se presentó una nueva denuncia contra él por violación de otra niña.

Las niñas no mienten.
#HartasDeImpunidad

[Ryan Dally @Ryandally08]

Senator Michaela Cash just nailed it in the Senate:

"I'm insulted, utterly insulted”

“That is an insult to every biological woman”

Sex is a biological reality.

Women shouldn't need an "exemption" to keep their own spaces safe from biological men.

Time to change the law and protect women's rights.

Australia has gone backwards under Anthony Albanese.

It’s scary to think of the damage that this man will cause in his remaining 2 years in Government.

[Anna Maria Junus @JunusAnna]

"Men are in danger from being in men's spaces."
"So let's send men into women's spaces so that men won't be in danger!"
"Won't that put women in danger?"
"Who cares?"

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

When you tell a woman she must pretend a man is a woman, you’re asserting the right to control her speech and perception of reality, while also trivialising and devaluing her female-specific experience. You’re asking her to agree that ‘woman’ is a concept men can embody at will.

[🇨🇦 Women Exist ♀ @Women___Exist]

This is the question to ask. Is it okay for a white person to “identify” as black?

[Teresa Domínguez #RESISTERS ♀️ @letra_escarlata]

Atenuantes por "dilaciónes indebidas", y "reparación de condena", vamos que una violación con penetración, a una niña de 13 años, se ha quedado entre otros en 3 años de condena, una indemnización. Cómo si eso se pudiese reparar un daño que la marcará por siempre. Esto no es un fallo aislado. Es el fruto de una ley mal diseñada y de una ideología que prioriza al agresor sobre la protección real de las víctimas. Los delitos sexuales merecen penas mucho más duras.