@wldarif@DefinitelyJSON@ShitlibSupreme The capacity for mobilization is kind of negated by the fact they're killing, wounding, and traumatizing the very group of people they'd need to mobilize in a large scale war.
Between people who emigrated to avoid the war, and casualties of all types, Russia is fucking itself.
@DewFanatic97@DeutschWatamate Longer time than usual to reply, I take it you're having to take a break from your Warthunder session to google.
Have a good one bro. We all go through a weird phase when we're young, you'll look back on and cringe like the rest of us did!
@DewFanatic97@DeutschWatamate You keep adding "always" to the sentence. I feel like you might be hallucinating.
In any case, yes, there was a battle in which the Nazis outnumbered the US forces in armor. It was too foggy for air support. And the Germans brought over a hundred Panthers.
They lost. Badly. ;)
@DewFanatic97@DeutschWatamate Yup, because I was referencing a real life event that took place. :) I was not saying it was a constant thing, because it never was. The western allies almost always had fire support. The Germans did not.
If you step away from Warthunder you might learn something.
@DewFanatic97@DeutschWatamate Seriously, you wehraboos could at least pick solid German designs that weren't overengineered half-baked super tanks that broke down every 5 minutes.
Yet to find one of you stan for a Panzer III, despite it being a phenomenal design for its day.
@DewFanatic97@DeutschWatamate Never said always. But by and large, yes, the Panther failed to affect the outcome of the war and was defeated by tanks that according to Warthunder, it should be fully outclassing.
Sherman had superior operational mobility, tactical mobility, and support structures.
@ADM_Welsly Oh, don't forget heat-seeking bombs. They could differentiate ships from the water and smoke stacks from furnaces.
Wasn't used, unlike the BAT, but nonetheless was the first real produced heat-seeking munition. Would've enabled bombers at high altitudes to engage ships.
@M18_GMC@dreyfus04141314@DeutschWatamate Why is it people with just vehicles for their names on here say the most dead on correct takes? Carry on, Hellcat, carry on.
@DewFanatic97@DeutschWatamate And German tanks still remained the vast minority of tank casualty causes. And even in scenarios where Panthers went up against the Sherman without any Allied air support of notable quantity, they normally lost horrendously.
Keep coping, the third reich got curbstomped.
@hugodeboss1@Nap51M Germany built a lot of them. Lack of fuel and trained pilots is more of the issue there.
But what was used was wholly incapable of making a difference.
Like every singular wunderwaffe Germany made…
Come back when the Jumo doesnt burst into flames randomly.
@hugodeboss1@Nap51M Let's assume 99% of all shootdowns were on landing.
It sounds like the Me-262's as a whole weren't impressive enough to secure their own airbases. Sad.
Wehraboos shouldn't discount ground kills, they stat padded against Soviet ground targets in early barbarossa.
@YourMom66547127@gaentleman One of your examples was Russia losing and becoming a vassal of another state for over a hundred years.
I also note you left out WW1, where it lost, flatout lost.
And note that the Russians also needed vast amounts of outside assistance for Napoleon and Barbarossa. :)
@otocobulus76@imperimnowtwrng@Havoc_Six The day I want or need a Serbian vatnik’s respect is not going to come any time soon.
Enjoy your obscurity, little puppet. The parasocial relationship you have with an empire that never even reached you is unhealthy.