@DanCevette Same for HC’s?
Then How does a HC @MIZZ get Hired in SEC w/losing Rcrd in SWAC 47-67 ?
DEI?,Stupidity,or Malfeasance by AssistantA.D. Blair Debord to
Suggest KJ to AD?
Debord has NO Ability to Evaluate & is Woke 🤡?
Homeowners overpay on property taxes every year because they don’t know how to challenge their assessment.
The county won’t send you a check—and the appeal process is a pain. We make it easy. Average homeowner saves $1,244.
Tap below to see how much you can save.
@PowerMizzoucom Looks like a VeryGood Prospect on paper but HCKJ had a verygood Hitter in DCorona but things
Went very Bad
Hope you talked w/Danny before you committed?
Best of Luck but seems like NO 1
Seems to get better under KJ&
Best 4Hitters left
Be Careful HCKJ >12ERA & No W’s
Or Hits
@MizzouToday@On3@SamraSource@kyle_mcareavy How could MIZ be Anything but bottom like 30-40th?
FB 26-24 1 Win Top10 Top25 <45%
Highest Cost per W
BasketB 43% W’s DG can Recruit but hasn’t learned to Coach?
Baseball 18-72 HCKJ WorstRcrd
EVER & NOT Fired
HCKJ BigLOSER In SWAC when Hired
Worst Big3 sports rcrds
🤡AD
@BFW Drink is 9 or Lower 26-24 barley>50%
VIP Stat HC ED has NEVER beat
1 SECTeam w/winning Rcrd in SEC
In 5yrs.
The W over Ohio state was w/several top 5 Player’s Not Playing &
QB was 3string
@MichaelWBratton@AthlonSteven@thatSECpodcast Chip @ MIZ has NEVER been
Considered TopTear Offensive
Mind.
Just another Reason HCDrink
Shouldn’t have got Top5 HC$.
In 5 yrs Avg ranking >40th
MIZ deserves a Legit AD,
& Curator’s(Trustees) that look
At Stats on HC’s before Hired &
Don’t Rubberstamp the
Poor AD’sMangmnt
@Coach_Odom@PowerMizzoucom@_nickbolton2@CoachBOdom HC that played Big 12 & could Evaluate .
HC ED in 5 yrs hasn’t beat 1 SEC
Team w/winning Rcrd in SEC !
How could he get Top5 pay 10.75Myr Guaranteed for 6yrs?
It happens when you have an AD that is more interested in his
🤡Status rather than long term
Excellence in AD dept
America is turning 250 years old. But most Americans have forgotten, or worse, never learned, our great history.
I put together a biographical reading list to remedy that, from 1776 to ~1860.
See link below. ⏬
You know about Einstein and much of his work, yet you probably can't name a single thing Ludwig von Mises did, and that's a scandal.
In 1920 Mises published "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth." He proved, in a few dozen pages, that a socialist economy cannot allocate resources rationally. No private ownership of the means of production means no market for capital goods. No market means no prices. No prices means no way to compare the value of building a steel mill versus a rail line. The planners are flying blind. Seventy years later the Soviet Union collapsed under exactly the contradiction he described, and the men who run economics departments still pretend he was wrong on technical grounds. He called it in 1920. They called it bad luck in 1991.
Then there's "Human Action," 900 pages he wrote in his second language, building economics up from a single self-evident starting point: man acts. He acts to remove felt uneasiness. From that one axiom Mises derived the entire structure of prices, interest, money, and the business cycle without a single regression or pretend-physics equation. Einstein had the decency to work with constants that actually hold. You cannot run a controlled experiment on a human being who learns, anticipates, and changes his mind. Mises refused to fake one. The profession punished him for this honesty by handing Nobel prizes to people who model the economy like a billiard table.
Consider the man's life. He fled Vienna in 1934 as the Nazis closed in, then fled Geneva in 1940, landing in New York with no job and no English-language reputation. Harvard and Princeton, busy hiring central planners, never offered him a paid chair. He taught at NYU on a salary funded by private donors, including the William Volker Fund. Friedrich Hayek, his student, took the 1974 Nobel. Mises died in 1973, one year too early, never having received a dime of official recognition for being right about the largest economic question of the twentieth century.
You were taught to revere the man who explained the stars. The man who explained economic reality got erased.
In a just society, Mises would have received multiple Nobel prizes. Do you agree?