The Epstein Class at it's finest: if you don't agree with this 'under 16s ban' then you're defending pedophiles and groomers online.
Coming from a literal pedophile protector... Mandelson and Saville come to mind.
Look at this little rat scumbag - he can't even hide his glee. The face, the laugh, the inner demon is on full display for everyone to see. He is absolutely loving every single second of selling you out.
This has absolutely nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with total, calculated control. The 'save the kids' narrative was always the bait; the real prize is absolute surveillance and the total destruction of an adult's right to a privat life.
Worse than that; the sheep have signed us up for a real time, real world panopticon. It is not just online anymore - it is the physical rollout of automated 'social credit scores,' mandatory digital IDs, total biometric surveillance, and state-enforced behaviour management. They have handed this regime the keys to track your wallet, your movement, and your mind, ushering in a brutal era of dystopian control where stepping out of line means being deleted from society with a single keystroke.
First step: they are stripping away online anonymity so they can harvest, track, and log every single move you make. Why else do you think they are aggressively building massive data centres across the country? It's not to host gaming servers - it's the storage infrastructure for a 24/7 wireless digital dragnet.
It never has been, and never will be, about the children.
While you are forced to submit facial biometrics and digital IDs just to open an app, MPs, Lords, civil servants and government allies will inevitably be exempt from having their phones screened and monitored. Rules for thee, but never for them.
Well done, Britain. You had a golden opportunity to see through the 'save the children' lie and stop this dystopian lockdown in its tracks. Instead, you were far too busy falling for fake 'movements' designed to distract and divide, and sleepwalking straight into a digital cage.
You stripped us ALL of our privacy, anonymity and freedoms and now you have exactly the totalitarian state you deserve. Enjoy the surveillance.
Apple built this exact tool in 2021. Within weeks, security researchers showed it could flag innocent people's content. Apple killed it 16 months later. The UK just gave tech companies three months to build it anyway, threatening prison for executives who refuse.
The proposal is for something called client-side scanning. End-to-end encryption (the technology that protects your WhatsApp or Signal messages) works by scrambling your messages on your phone before they leave it. Nobody intercepting them can read them. Client-side scanning changes that sequence: your phone checks every image and message against a database of prohibited content before encrypting it. The lock stays in place, but the inspection happens first. When the government says "scan for nude images," technically they mean "scan everything."
The people who invented internet security have already ruled on this. Ronald Rivest helped create RSA encryption, the system behind every padlock icon you see in a browser. Whitfield Diffie invented public-key cryptography, the math that all web security is built on. In October 2021, both co-signed a paper with twelve other leading cryptographers, concluding that device-level scanning undermines security for everyone while giving law enforcement only unreliable gains. Once that infrastructure is on every phone, any government can point it at whatever they decide to ban next.
The EU spent three years trying to pass something identical. Germany blocked a Council vote in October 2025. On March 26, 2026, the European Parliament voted 307 to 306 to reject it. One vote. German federal police data from those debates showed roughly 48% of the 300,000 chats reported annually under existing scanning rules were false positives, innocent people's messages treated as criminal evidence.
There is one more consequence the announcement left out. The government wants to block nude images on children's devices but not adults'. Enforcing that line means every device in the UK needs to know whether its owner is a child. The only way to do that is mandatory age verification. Signal pointed out where this lands: every UK resident would need to prove their identity just to communicate privately. That means 67 million people submitting identification to use software they already own.
The EU rejected this by one vote two and a half months ago. The UK is now attempting it alone.
I've just heard 3 people who were reporting on riots in Northern Ireland using their YouTube accounts have been arrested.
They were not involved in any rioting, they are not involved in any criminal activity.
They are looking to do anther Southport to clamp down on free speech.
#TwoTierKeir
๐จ A "BIG MOMENT FOR OUR COUNTRY."
Good morning to the millions of everyday Brits waking up to a new digital prison.
Keir Starmer has just officially announced his blanket ban on social media for teenagers!
He literally stood at a podium, rambled on about his childhood in the 1970s, and claimed he is doing this to keep your kids safe. ๐คก
You honestly have to laugh at the sheer delusion.
He completely refuses to protect our actual streets from violent criminals, but he is completely obsessed with policing your family's phones.
Do not be fooled for a single second!
To enforce this ban, every single adult in Britain will now be forced to upload a passport or digital ID just to browse the web!
This is not about child safety. It is a massive Trojan horse for total state surveillance.
RT if you see right through this scam and refuse to let the Labour elite control us! ๐ฌ๐ง๐ฅ
The MoD felt the need to deny the tanker raid was staged. Ask yourself why. Because in the same breath they accidentally confirmed everything people were saying
Their own spokesman admitted footage was taken at multiple points and compiled together. Different takes. Edited into one seamless video.
A voice can be heard saying ROLLING. And telling a soldier to HOLD THAT during a live search of the vessel.
Those are not military commands. Those are film production commands. And the MoD just told us that themselves.
The policy to seize shadow fleet ships was announced in MARCH. Three months. Not one tanker touched.
The Smyrtos sailed from the Russian oil terminal Ust-Luga on June 4. They tracked it for ten days as it crossed the North Sea and entered the Channel.
They did not stumble upon this ship on the night of June 14. They chose the night before the G7 to act.
That is not a military decision. That is a scheduling decision.
World leaders arriving the next morning specifically to discuss standing up to Russia. Starmer needed something to walk into that room with. 3am operation. Tweet before breakfast. Video uploaded before the world woke up.
The man Trump publicly called not Winston Churchill needed to walk into the G7 looking like one. So he produced a film the night before the G7 to prove he is still relevant.
As DPP he volunteered to go after British soldiers. Did not have to. Was not asked to. Chose it. For free.
Hereโs is what makes this truly obscene. The man now wrapping himself in the Armed Forces spent years pursuing British soldiers through the courts. Nobody asked him. Nobody paid him. He chose to prosecute them. Worked for free to do it. That is not a lawyer doing his job. That is a man with an agenda.
Armed Forces shrinking by 300 a month. Lowest since the Napoleonic Wars.
Eleven days before this three Royal Marines were killed when a Merlin Mk4 crashed in Devon. Same aircraft. Investigation open. Not grounded. Used anyway.
Chris Gayson. Lily-Mae Fisher. Owen Green. Lily-Mae never got her wings. They were due this month.
He spent years trying to destroy soldiers like them. Then used what is left of them to save himself.
Our soldiers deserved better than being props in his political survival film.