Right To Privacy

Fighter of Freedom Of Speech in India under the Fascist Regime of NaMo

[Right To Privacy @FekusSystem]

#IndiaVotes #LokSabhaElections2019 #VoteForChange #VoteForIndia #voteagainstterror #secularism “I pledge to Protect & Preserve the Integrity of Sovereign Democratic Secular Republic of India to secure to all Citizens: Justice, Liberty, Equality & Fraternity.” #IndiaElections2019

[Rajdeep Sardesai @sardesairajdeep]

INTERESTING: former Kerala Chief Secretary claims Gyanesh Kumar offered him to contest Lok Sabha seat on a BJP ticket and become a union minister. https://t.co/4E6SswPbpR

[Right To Privacy @FekusSystem]

@SwiggyCares Unable to see the order section at all. App not working.

[Right To Privacy @FekusSystem]

@instamart_it @Swiggy

Items missing from Instamart Order and Help/Support section from app not working...

What to do @harshamjty @rohitisb ?

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

One gets bail within days despite being caught on camera.

Other languishes in jail for six years without even a trial or hearing.

Same justice system. Very different approach.

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

This is a school for tribal children in Balaghat.

Would our politicians ever send their own children to a school like this?

The ASHA workers here have not received their salaries for last 6 months.

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

SAVE TRIBAL KIDS OF BALAGHAT

I am still in Balaghat, meeting the families of the KIDS who have died.

What I am hearing from locals is deeply disturbing. They say the actual number of deaths is much higher than what is being officially reported (36).

86 children have been hospitalised recently after the tribals’ protest.

I have also been told that children are being cremated without postmortems, and in some cases, even in absence of parents. SDM is the one who is behind all this.

These children could’ve been saved had they received treatment on time.

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

I hereby resign as the Chief Minister of MP with immediate effect.

I thank Hon’ble PM @narendramodi ji for giving me the opportunity to serve the people of MP, an opportunity in which I have clearly failed.

@GovernorMP

[Right To Privacy @FekusSystem]

@sidd_sharma01 Gujju?

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

Boston University published an article about me for being their alumnus.

Why doesn’t DU proudly celebrate Modi as their alumnus? He is, after all, the Prime Minister of India.

Shouldn’t they be flexing about it instead of trying to hide his degree?

https://t.co/Gvzj6mBZap

[Mahua Moitra @MahuaMoitra]

In solidarity @JohnBrittas

[Cockroach Janta Party - CJP @Cockroachisback]

BJP tried slandering this genZ girl by calling her ‘Babar ki Virasat’. Look how she came up with an extraordinary ppt presentation.

You just can’t beat GenZs..
Vastaguna huyiyaa!!

[Right To Privacy @FekusSystem]

@E20Party E20

[E20 JANTA PARTY @E20Party]

Our reach has dropped by 95% by twitter in the last 24 hours.

If you’re seeing this post, comment “E20” so we know it’s reaching real people. Every comment helps boost visibility.

[Rahul Gandhi @RahulGandhi]

धर्मेंद्र प्रधान भ्रष्टाचार और भारत की बर्बाद education system के प्रतीक हैं और हमेशा रहेंगे।

उसी system ने 26 बच्चों की जान ली, और लाखों युवाओं को सड़कों पर उतरने को मजबूर किया।

इस्तीफ़ा भी नैतिकता से नहीं - युवाओं के आक्रोश से डरकर देना पड़ा।

और आज उसी व्यक्ति को संसद में BJP माला पहना रही है। यह कोई सम्मान नहीं - लाखों बच्चों के भविष्य की बर्बादी का जश्न है।

देश का हर छात्र ये देख रहा है। और इसमें शामिल हर चेहरा याद रखेगा।

[Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) @internetfreedom]

The Delhi Police's takedown drive against posts critical of the Prime Minister is unconstitutional.

New Delhi, 27 July 2026

Media reports today state that the Delhi Police has directed social media platforms to remove posts, videos, memes and reels containing remarks it describes as "abusive", "offensive" and "objectionable" towards the Prime Minister, uploaded during the student protests at Jantar Mantar and after the 'Sansad Chalo' march of 20 July 2026. At least three platforms have reportedly received notices. Several posts have already been taken down. A dedicated police team is monitoring social media to identify further content, and reports indicate that criminal proceedings are contemplated against those who posted it. No order has been published. While reports indicate the notices invoke the Information Technology Act, the specific provision relied upon and the text of the notices remain undisclosed.

The Internet Freedom Foundation condemns this takedown drive and calls for the notices to be disclosed and withdrawn.

On the reports available, the content being removed is political expression. The movement at Jantar Mantar has been conducted as much through reels, memes, posters and digital artwork as through assembly on the ground. This is how a digital native generation raised online speaks about accountability. As per Article 19(2) restrictions on speech only on eight specified grounds. Offensiveness is not one of them. In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the IT Act precisely because expressions such as "grossly offensive" and causing "annoyance" were vague, subjective, and swept protected speech within their net. Eleven years later, the Delhi Police is applying the same standard through informal notices and legal powers which are not being publicly disclosed.

As per existing practices there are two routes for removing online content. The first is Section 69A of the IT Act read with the Blocking Rules, 2009, which requires a reasoned order, committee review, and notice to the originator, as the Delhi High Court affirmed in Tanul Thakur v. Union of India (2022). The second is Section 79(3)(b), which Shreya Singhal read down to require a court order or a government notification strictly confined to Article 19(2) grounds. If these notices were routed through the Sahyog Portal, they rest on a regime whose constitutionality remains under challenge before multiple High Courts. However, even if it is used police notices citing offensiveness satisfy neither.

Reports that platforms were told the content violates "their policies" make the defect worse, the police have no mandate to enforce the community guidelines of private companies. Unpublished directions are also contrary to Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637, which requires that orders restricting fundamental rights be published so that they can be challenged. If the underlying theory is defamation of the Prime Minister, the police have no role at all. Defamation under Section 356 of the BNS is a non-cognizable offence, prosecuted only on a complaint by the person aggrieved under Section 222 of the BNSS.

Our demands

1. The Delhi Police must publish every notice issued, the legal provision invoked, and the list of URLs affected.

2. Notices directed at satire, criticism, and political commentary must be withdrawn. Any removal must follow the procedures under Section 69A or a judicial order.

3. No criminal proceedings should be initiated against persons for speech that does not meet the constitutional threshold of incitement.

4. Platforms must decline requests unsupported by valid legal orders, notify affected users, and disclose the number of government demands in their transparency reports.

Students who question an examination system are exercising their fundamental rights and deleting their posts will not delete their questions.

Reports referred to:

1. Times of India, "Delhi Police orders removal of offensive posts against PM Narendra Modi linked to NEET paper leak protests", 27 July 2026
2. News18, "Delhi Police Issues Notices To Social Media Platforms Over Offensive Posts Against PM Modi During Jantar Mantar Protest", 27 July 2026

[Congress @INCIndia]

○ We unequivocally condemn all the attacks on students. The Modi government had promised during the negotiations that no student would be picked up and that there would be no police action against them.

○ But today, there is a list of FIRs that have been filed against students in Patna, West Bengal, and Bihar.

○ Message for students: We - IYC, NSUI, and the Indian National Congress, are with you. You are not alone, and you will not be left alone.

👉If you have been served a legal notice, detained, asked to appear for questioning, had any of your social media posts taken down, or need legal support in any situation, please contact our CKG Legal SOS at 9811867474.

: @mehartweets ji

[Indian Youth Congress @IYC]

Amit Shah ke kehne par ab Students ko Hostels aur Gharon se uthaya jaa raha hai.

Bas isliye kyunki unhone protest kiya. Bas isliye kyunki unhone Sarkar se jawab maanga.

Ye kanoon ka raaj hai ya badle ki rajneeti?

Students ko dara kar unki awaaz Dabayi jaa rhi hai.

[Cockroaches of India @CJP_for_India]

On July 13th, the Lucknow-Kanpur Expressway was inaugurated, described as an elevated expressway with a total cost of approximately 4,200 to 4,700 crore rupees.

Just 13 days after its inauguration, the millions of rupees being spent are now being questioned.

What's the flaw that even expressways are now sinking? Where are all these crores of rupees going?

Repair work was underway(after viral), may have been completed.

[Cockroaches of India @CJP_for_India]

Dharmendra Pradhan istipha do 😳

[Shashi Tharoor @ShashiTharoor]

This is utterly appalling. Even in the days of the JP Movement leading up to the Emergency, there was no bar by the @UnivofDelhi on students joining any of his protests, and a couple of members of my Union Cabinet at St Stephen’s, including the late Chandan Mitra, openly did so.

If one of India’s foremost public universities is allowed to threaten its students and faculty with significant consequences if they attend a protest, it has a chilling effect on democratic speech and expression. Most DU students are not so privileged as to ignore such a sternly-worded warning without fearing that their academic or professional prospects might suffer if they attended the protest.

A university is meant to teach critical thinking and independent assessment of issues, not to stifle these very qualities. Shame on those at the @UnivofDelhi who saw fit to issue such a tweet. They are unworthy of holding any position at an institution of higher learning in a democracy.