Fetterman supporter, this is a parody account. Politically moderate/central. Social liberal, fiscal conservative. Constituent of Fetterman. Father, and husband.
@JasmineForUS Jasmine Crocket is one of the main people responsible for Charlie Kirk’s death in case anyone was wondering. She spread constant lies and called for violence.
@libsoftiktok@OhioState We're gonna need a lot more 30.06 rounds than I initially thought... in the spirit of fairness, someone please show me a video (with full context) where Charlie actively spread hatred and called for violence? Anyone? Just 1 example, give me 1 example and I'll give you a benefit
@chrsdcook just gonna leave this here since you cba to fact check yourself
https://t.co/OKPt77s9PK
https://t.co/poHYbpwoA4
Clearly, the truth doesn't mean anything to you as you're still spewing this toxic propaganda.
Please, debate. I'll even let you train a shooter on me
@xMikeMac I had to argue with wife just to go to work this morning because she knows that there are people who have different opinions than me and know where I work. She's actually afraid I'm goin to get shot @ work for having opinions because that's the new norm. Yes I am carrying today
@xMikeMac Because it is different. This can't be hid behind "he was gonna pass a bill that did XYZ" or "he was putting everyone in danger". No, he was engaging in open dialogue. It's like if someone did the same to Cenk. Fight like hell has a whole new meaning now...
@DerrickEvans4WV This man also attacked his parents (both of who are in their late 60s), choked his mother out, and beat his father because they supported Trump. He also has a video of him encouraging violence towards Trump supporters to his 4 year old son.
@DerrickEvans4WV I disagree with her views, so that means I can do the same to her right? Sadly, I don't have anything that is chambered in 30-06, but I have 6.5 Creedmoor and 7.62, but still the same idea right?
TikTok is what spread live videos of George Floyd, Minneapolis riots, and basically everything. That's why it's gone. It's because the government couldn't control it. Now SCOTUS has to define what a "legally binding contract" is as it was used in the ruling and has no constitutional definition, which could just destroy the entire economy but it's okay, they're 1 step closer to thought crime. If they cared about foreign entities and national security to the general population, it wouldn't have been TikTok getting banned. There are far larger and more commonly used websites and apps that collect nearly identical information and can be influenced by foreign adversaries. It's not because of national security. It's about control. I never used TikTok myself, but I did read the terms and agreements, and listened to all the public hearings, it's quite literally no different than Alphabet but you don't see Google getting banned because they can sensor it.
@cesanchez8920@butleriano No. As a former sailor, people really don't care out on deployment or in civ areas. Sometimes they'd care but most of the time they didn't. If it was the CO or XO, yeah you bet your ass someone's gonna get pissed, but like an ltjg or smth, naw.