Because it was time to address the dark clouds overhead at #RolandGarros:
I wrote about how Alexander Zverev is almost certainly going to win the French Open, and how people around the sport are feeling about that likelihood.
Read here:
https://t.co/aZZNSCpVwn
@jamesgraysport I think it's Zverev in 4 but I don't think it's a fait accompli. At some point Zverev's level will drop for a bit. Cobolli will need to capitalise. If Cobolli can keep it close there's a non-zero chance he causes Zverev to get stressed and go all passive.
@RomseyCam@BritishTennisUp Not me. Would rather it went to someone deserving, than someone who has had a lifetime of wildcards and is very fortunate to come from a country with a big federation.
@MichaelCGM@neddthomas@PollyJames@SkySportsDarts I actually really disagree when they stopped it yesterday second time 😅 from a human level it was right and compassionate, but as a broadcaster he was having a really human moment and saying something really interesting and they cut it short.
@DavzyF https://t.co/eB6Pu6skr9
If we are taking things players say after the season as objective fact, here is a player saying Jonathan mismanaged the jury
he’s actually correct & likely WOULD’VE won had he not flipped on Cirie at f6. nonetheless rizgod I will be waiting for your return to fiji #survivor50
@DavzyF Ok but if the other players, the ones who vote for the winner don't care, then how is it a good move? There's not an objective scoring system, you have to read what the players around with will value and act accordingly...