@LeoDaly15@FrankEra_@lauriewhitwell@TheAthleticFC He's not wrong, but if your captain and the players that every other player looks up to, you make the comments in private rather than publically putting the boot into man who is lying on the canvas at a 9 count.
@LeoDaly15@FrankEra_@lauriewhitwell@TheAthleticFC Maybe, but there has to be some discipline restored to the squad and you can't make those comments against the coach, especially when you're club captain.
Bruno is our best player, but a line has to be drawn at some point.
@TheLAMatthews I'd not start MDL, we need to take a lot of care with him & do all that is possible to ensure he avoids injury. As a long suffering bad back-man I can confirm that the next twinge is never far away!
@__scottsaunders Yep, drop him completely; he needs a rest anyway,but he can't get away with the comments. You can't have the quad disciplin implode. Tielemans has looks pretty good playing a bit higher. I'd also start at least one of Lacey or Amass, it wasn't fair to chuck them on at 0-4 v Como.
@fplshere9992@__scottsaunders Utd had a financial advantage due to an unparalleled period of success, they earned that; it doesn't lessen the crime committed by the Glazers. If they'd done the same to Arsenal I don't think you be saying "Well,Arsenal had the money to pay them".
Agreed on resource allocation.
@__scottsaunders He needs to get a reasonable foundation & then not rip it up tactically(ETH) or blow it up emotionally(Amorim). The PL is a different beast compared to even 5 years ago & almost every match is very competitive. Nagelsmann would need to come in with his eyes open to the challenge.
@fplshere9992@__scottsaunders Wenger was a fabulous manager who deserves all the credit in the world for what he achieved at Arsenal & the tricky periods he guided them through.
But it's not just about net spend.
Between 2005-2013, money in/out from owners:
Arsenal: ยฃ0/ยฃ0
Man Utd: ยฃ478M out
Significant.
@fplshere9992@__scottsaunders If the Glazers has taken over Arsenal in 2005 and treated them exactly as they have Utd, there's a chance that Arsenal would've gone bust or not be a PL team. Utd have endured them because they were and still are an incredible commercial juggernaut.
@fplshere9992@__scottsaunders Sure, but Utd now pay around ยฃ50M (ยฃ35M up until '26) a year on debt,that's funds for an additional ยฃ100M (ยฃ70M previously) elite player that could be added every other season that goes up in smoke. The Glazers have taken out ยฃ1.2B out of Utd when most other clubs put money in.
@fplshere9992@__scottsaunders Certainly, I'm absolutely not trying to lessen Arteta's achievements. What I'm saying is that the structure above him were all pulling in the same direction for a club that wasn't laden sky high expectations (at the time) or crippling debt & cancerous owners.
@fplshere9992@__scottsaunders Yes,but he wasn't managing the impossible puzzle that's Utd & has a had reasonably competent structure above him for the most part. Arsenal ripped up player contracts & replaced them,I just don't think Utd have the finances to do that. OGS could've been our MA,if backed properly.