whateveryouwant

A fool of a Took

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

u guys should check this out
wWbvh6 @_masaki_0305 @ruby0x_ng @vishnoi_ra22500 @SamratGhos68958

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

lfg guys
OABZsS @aamoihc @s_oul_ly @Light_solana @Bina_Hussain1

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

just claimed, u should claim too
ZDLUGZ @iam_m_mujeeb @Lordmagnetic13 @Harkinz07 @alirazazaeem

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

lfg guys
SJJ1j9 @NFTeeen @kirtala963 @Femidernity @YunesB47506

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

hurry up guys
0Vscdb @niicoBlaze @PastelHipster__ @AlexiaAlexiaf99 @hakim_m13

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

hurry up guys
7EHnFR @Mainline_eth @Trbdonna @Doc_Doofus @gappy3190

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@Kollectiv117 @kraatakans @4rt_yy @wowthatsruff Everything he said was factually true what is he so wrong on?

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@fineokay_ all of it is 10/10 until you see the coconut shavings 🤮

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@WonderOfViolet @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun I'm pretty sure drama stirring usually benefits most channels, maybe I'm wrong but he seems to have some point to make here. I don't think he's mindlessly shit-stirring. Yes some of what he said was insensitive but I've not seen someone disagree with him logically yet.

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@agistopic_ttv @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun the point viper made in the video he released today was that the impressions on the reactors video would have to go somewhere else and although it might not be towards the content they're watching it's still an imbalance.

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@agistopic_ttv @ChimpM0De @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun This will always be the case, no matter what he would've said he will generate some profit and the attention he's gaining shines a light on the weird side of twitch/youtube with all these react streamers essentially ripping content off others.

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@agistopic_ttv @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun It happens a lot on twitch but there's arguments to be made that even though the streamer is there, it doesn't mean the content is transformative or whatever and it's taking views from somewhere else which is viper's point I believe.

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@ChimpM0De @Uh_Hell_O @agistopic_ttv @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun Damn it's really like you have no point to make so you just point a finger and make a random claim. The point is about how in each analogy consent is violated which is obviously WRONG dumbfuck.

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@ChimpM0De @agistopic_ttv @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun Wanna explain that one for me?

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@agistopic_ttv @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun Like people doing 24/7 streams and being asleep whilst they play kitchen nightmares in the background or something just seems a little odd but I guess its okay if they content they're watching was watched with consent.

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@agistopic_ttv @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun I'm not sure how I see it I just know that it seems wrong to have people on streams afk whilst people in their chat watch essentially someone else. Something about this seems off to me but maybe I'm the odd one out.

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@ppppppsllll @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun Honestly, you've changed my mind completely.

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@agistopic_ttv @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun I agree with you, he shouldn't have made the analogy as it's unnecessary but do you think that react content is beneficial or not? I'm curious since that's what his whole argument can be boiled down to, that reactors are exploitative of the content creators?

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@agistopic_ttv @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun This tweet doesn't make sense to me. You say it does take away from his points and you don't agree with them. If you're disagreeing with his broader 14 page argument simply because of an insensitive analogy I don't think you agreed with his analysis of the situation at first.

[whateveryouwant @FinlayWaters3]

@ppppppsllll @Susu_jpg @hasanthehun Unless what? He chose it because in both scenarios a person is violating someone else's consent. That's it. If you think that there's something further he's trying to say can you explain it because clearly I'm misunderstanding this?