Finnballwizard

Video game blogger and youtube channel master. Promoting the uplifting of human consciousness. Meditation. Connecting to reality.

[Ivan Katchanovski @I_Katchanovski]

Videos show that Ukrainian deserters were illegally imprisoned & tortured in secret prison of neo-Nazi-led Azov corps of National Guard of Ukraine near Kyiv. Several prisoners were reportedly killed. Azov is glorified & whitewashed by Umland, Shekhovtsov & Western media & politicians. Relatives of imprisoned attempted to storm prison.

[A Midwestern Doctor @MidwesternDoc]

Jimmy Dore told Joe Rogan about a sleep drug that put people straight into deep sleep, raised growth hormone, and treated opioid and alcohol addiction.

The FDA made it Schedule I, a stricter class than cocaine. Rohypnol ("roofies"), far easier to slip into a drink, is still only Schedule IV, like Valium and Xanax.

The drug is GHB. Here's how a sleep aid became "the date rape drug." 🧵

[BladeoftheSun @BladeoftheS]

You will hear a lot about the protests in France today, but Albania has practically collapsed with protestors controlling almost the entire country.

The Police are literally forming defensive lines outside the main Government offices while firing rubber bullets.

A last stand.

[Pavel Ibarra Meda @pavelibarrameda]

The reason I picked Vallée’s cover in this thumbnail is because of the perception manipulation that he and John Keel constantly wrote about can no longer be attributed to just 'The Phenomenon'.

We have no idea what technologies the world’s super powers have developed over the last century that can also alter human perception and on a mass scale.

Ignoring that as the potential secret is a terrible idea. And for all we know, those involved in the deception could have zero clue that these weapons even exist.

Hence why I think Greg’s latest is so important to consider.

[JenOakie42💫 @OakieJs]

The Entity...large and small, as experimented with by Thomas Kinraide, and realized in nature with red sprites

[Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand]

We keep seeing videos of clashes between French highschoolers and the police but almost no-one speaks about why these highschoolers are in the street, as if it all happened in a vacuum.

They have several complaints: missing teachers (a huge issue, almost 10% of class hours aren't taught at all according to the French ministry of education - https://t.co/ucW9dFnebY - mostly due to missing teachers, it's insane, the equivalent of 2 whole days of class a month gone!), run-down buildings, classrooms above 40°C during summer, classes of 32-35 students, etc.

But, to me, the most salient complaint has to do with the new French system for getting into higher education, called "Parcoursup", which borders on the absurd and is a perfect illustration of France's Kafkaesque technocracy.

So, it used to be the case - when I was a highschooler in France myself - that getting to university or Grandes Écoles was relatively straightforward.

If you passed the bac - France's national end-of-high-school exam - you could enroll at your local uni. Dead simple.

And, if you wanted to go to a Grande École, you had to apply to a so-called "prépa" - a notoriously grueling two-year preparatory program - then sit the competitive exam. That wasn't simple at all but at least it was clear.

There was, admittedly, one issue with this system: since anyone with the bac could enroll into university, the most popular programs ended up with more applicants than seats, and had to resort to drawing lots.

In 2017, for instance, medicine in the Paris region received 8,507 first-choice applications for 7,650 places, and 857 applicants were left out by lottery (https://t.co/LfdCaFf6p7). A real problem, but a narrow one, affecting a limited number of programs.

In typical French technocratic fashion, the government's answer was to take a sledgehammer to crack a nut. They decided to tear down the entire system - which had largely been established under Napoleon - and rebuild it from scratch, for all 640,000 high schoolers who apply every year.

Now, you will undoubtedly be surprised to learn that, among other absurdities in the new system, highschoolers still pass the baccalauréat ("bac") but it's become almost entirely useless.

It's very hard to describe the new Parcoursup system without giving you a headache, because it is very complex. And that's a big part of the issue.

I'm still going to try though.

Here's how it works. In your final year of high school, you list up to 10 choices of program (e.g. "law at Panthéon-Sorbonne University") on the Parcoursup platform, and you're not allowed to rank them. This includes prépas for Grandes Écoles as well.

Every program then ranks every single applicant according to their own criteria, which are variable and may change every year.

First 5 absurdities:

1) As a student you're institutionally not allowed to have preferences when applying, your 1st choice counts just as much as your 10th choice. And you can't game the system by selecting only 1 choice, because it gains you nothing: programs can't see your other choices anyway. Choosing only one program just removes your safety net.

2) You're playing a game whose rules are only revealed once most of the moves have been played.

Say you really want to go into a specific program - again, let's take the example of law at Panthéon-Sorbonne University: this program will only tell you which criteria it uses to rank you, and how much each one weighs, in December of your final year of high school, shortly before you apply on Parcoursup.

And by then, most of what you'll be judged on (your grades from the previous year, your choice of subjects, etc.) is already set in stone, so all you can do is look at the previous years' criteria and pray they don't change.

3) The most absurd of all. As we saw above, Parcoursup was meant to end the "injustice" of popular programs having more applicants than seats, and of drawing lots as a result.

This exact problem has now been compounded by an order of magnitude: since everyone applies to 10 programs without ranking them, each of these programs gets absolutely flooded with applicants, most of whom will end up elsewhere.

For instance, in 2025, law at Panthéon-Sorbonne received 19,404 applications for 745 seats (https://t.co/RFMI6U58mt). In other words, ironically, the new system took a problem that was an exception - hitting a limited number of students - and made it the rule for all 640,000 who apply each year, all in the name of solving it. Completely Kafkaesque!

4) The new system is - obviously - also unpopular with university teachers, who have to do the ranking. I mean: imagine being a law teacher at Sorbonne and being told that your job now includes having to join a committee that has to review and rank some 19,404 application files every year. At 3-4 minutes per file reported by one university committee (https://t.co/QmxJVcbU95), that's 140-180 working days a year!

In practice, this means that committees rely on algorithms to pre-rank applicants and only look closely at some files. Which means students produce application files that nobody really reads: funnily, to prove this, a student last year replaced her cover letter with a brownie recipe and still got in (https://t.co/nBihkJXul0).

5) And, yes, it means the bac - an institution in France, put in place by Napoleon - is now almost completely useless given that, by the time bac results come out in July, you've already gone through Parcoursup. As a result, whether you have a good or bad grade doesn't change your fate one bit, as long as you pass.

Getting a 19/20 gets you exactly the same as an 11/20: Napoleon's bac has been reduced to a pass/fail formality.

But that's not all, we haven't yet spoken about the process after you apply and start getting responses from programs, which happens starting early June.

This one is a real beauty of majestic French bureaucratic complexity.

So programs can give you one of 3 answers: yes, no, or waiting list. Waiting list means not yet, but maybe later if another candidate gives up their seat.

As a student, you have 3 rules:
Rule 1. Once you get a yes, you have two days to accept it (reduced to one day if the answer comes in mid-August), or you lose it.
Rule 2. You can only hold one "yes" at a time
Rule 3. You can keep your waiting-list places while holding a yes. If a program you prefer later says yes, you can switch to it, and your previous "yes" seat is released automatically.

And, funnily enough, once you've received your first answers, you're suddenly obliged to rank the programs you're still waitlisted on, within a four-day window, a few days before the bac. Any you forget to rank get deleted.

Are you lost by now? If you are, you're not alone: in one survey, only 6% of French parents find it transparent, and only 5% fair (https://t.co/uZucbJCKUS).

Quite an achievement for a system whose literal objective was to make access to higher education fairer and more transparent.

And it's not as if the problem hadn't been solved elsewhere, in ways France could have learned from.

For instance in China, once you have your Gaokao score - China's national university entrance exam, roughly equivalent to the French bac - you list your choices for university in order of preference and places are then filled in one go, best scores first: each student lands in the highest-ranked choice their score allows. Done. Procedurally fair - even brutally so - simple and transparent.

But no, we French had to somehow decide that - bizarrely - the bac wasn't going to count anymore but previous grades would, that students wouldn't be allowed to rank their choices (until, suddenly, they're forced to in June), that each program would invent its own criteria and only reveal them once most of your grades are set in stone, and that the whole thing would play out not in one go but over weeks of waiting lists and 48-hour deadlines. All ending in a system that piles an immense amount of work, complexity, anxiety and stress on everyone involved.

And it culminates with protests against the administrative Kafkaesqueness of it all, and tear gas for the kids complaining about it.

How very, very French.

[Jikkyleaks 🐭 @Jikkyleaks]

I was taught for years that @DrAndyWakefield had committed fraud - it was not true.

His prior paper - written with @PeterDaszak - showed that measles virus was a contributor to Crohn's.

The Lancet paper showed that bowel disease was a feature of severe disability after vaccination.

Wakefield had to be destroyed to protect the vaccine industry or it would have collapsed in 1998.

That is how the pharma industry works, but they can't do it alone.

In the case of the Wakefield saga, they were aided by the @bmj_latest who commissioned Brian Deer to fabricate a fake story about "fraud" because they were being paid by GSK and Merck - the very vaccine makers who stood to be eviscerated by the truth about their product's safety.

All this is documented (thread below).

The children in the paper were permanently disabled by the MMR vaccine and never, ever, got recognition. They are on track to die without ever having their vaccine disability recognised.

This is the worst travesty of the medical industry ever committed - because it was done for money.

@MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @PGtzsche1 @AaronSiriSG @stkirsch @RWMaloneMD @Fynnderella1

[Dan Dicks @DanDicksPFT]

The $15,000 “MISSION” To Firebomb Synagogue That WASN’T ANTISEMITISM - Full Court Breakdown!!!

The mainstream media is pushing another "antisemitic hate crime" narrative in Canada, but the truth just exploded in court.

Mohamed Akodad, the man who pleaded guilty to firebombing a Montreal synagogue, admitted he was offered a $15,000 "mission" by strangers while struggling with drug addiction.

He had no idea the target was Jewish, received $3K upfront, panicked, and bailed.

This wasn't ideology, it was a desperate junkie taking a shady gig.

Why did politicians and legacy media immediately label it a vile antisemitic attack?

Why the rush to fear and outrage?

In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down how this case screams entrapment and fits the exact same pattern as previous RCMP and intelligence agency setups (Nuttall/Korody, VIA Rail, and multiple hate crime hoaxes).

These manufactured crises are being used to justify Bill C-9, the new "Combatting Hate Act" that just received Royal Assent and dramatically expands government power to police speech, thought, and dissent.

Problem → Reaction → Solution. The playbook never changes.

Wake up, Canada.
The real threat isn't the patsies, it's the agencies and political insiders creating the chaos to justify more control.

Share this video widely, question everything, and demand accountability!

VIDEO ➜ https://t.co/fo3hlK0mWc

[no.mind @the_no_mind]

This is Georges Lakhovsky.

He cured plant tumors with a copper ring, linked cancer to geology & argued cells behave like antennas.

In 1941, he arrived in New York. In 1942, he was struck by a limousine & died. Soon, hospitals removed his machines.

Here's what he documented: 🧵

[Finnballwizard @FinnballWizard]

World cup 26 so far. Let downs - Turkey, Paraguay & South Africa. Nice surprises - USA, Canada, Morocco.

[no.mind @the_no_mind]

Cancer used to feel like a mysterious disease to me.

Something that appears uninvited, feared by most & poorly understood.

A disease no one can clearly explain & for which there are no real answers.

That perception changed over time.

Cancer affected people in my family — my grandfather & my aunt.

At the same time, I started studying cancer more seriously.

One of my most viewed threads is still the thread on cancer as a metabolic disease, synthesizing the work of Thomas Seyfried. It reached 26 million views.

Since then, I've continued updating my understanding of cancer & chronic disease.

As I went deeper, one name kept coming up.

Gilbert Ling.

If you read & listen to Jack Kruse, Ray Peat, Gerald Pollack, or Mae-Wan Ho, they all reference Ling as a major influence on how they think about biology.

At the same time, everyone admits the same thing: Ling is difficult to understand. His books are dense. His papers are technical.

Gerald Pollack eventually wrote Cells, Gels, and the Engines (2001) of Life to translate Ling’s work, after attending one of his lectures in Hungary and realizing how much mainstream biology was missing.

Pollack’s later work on structured water followed directly from that exposure.

I prefer reading original sources.

So I went back to Ling's books & papers & worked through them.

What I found was more than I expected.

Ling was not only writing about structured water.

He was arguing that the modern textbook understanding of how cells work is fundamentally wrong.

He challenged the idea that the cell is the primary unit of life and argued instead that protoplasm is more fundamental.

He explained ion behavior, cell permeability & drug action in ways mainstream biology never integrated.

Like others who challenged biological orthodoxy — Robert O. Becker in bioelectricity, Andrew Marino in EMFs — Ling faced institutional resistance: loss of funding and exclusion from the mainstream research system.

This matters because modern medicine, including cancer research, is built on the same cell model Ling challenged.

If that model is wrong, progress will remain limited.

This article is my synthesis of Ling’s work—his experiments, books & papers—compressed into a framework you can use to understand cancer, chronic disease & your biology differently.

This article isn’t about cancer cures & it’s not medical advice.

But I absolutely believe that every human being on earth who cares about their health & wants to prevent chronic disease should understand Ling's view of reality.

This is the most important piece I've written this year.

[UNN @UnityNewsNet]

This is the person behind 'assisted dying' in the UK.

The person who said she had months left to live in 2024.

The person who set up childline in order to tip off high profile paedophiles in the British Establishment.

That person is of course Esther Rantzen.

Her Mother was Katherine Leverson.

[Rush @exRAF_Al]

Cracking little tune, the army needs to get a sense of humour. Surely being a captain must be depressing enough without a little light relief?

[FinnGear 🇫🇮 @FinnishGear]

The Israelis have made an enemy for life.

[Yousef Munayyer @YousefMunayyer]

Slovenia recognized a Palestinian state, called out Israel's genocide in Gaza, and became the first EU state to ban weapons trade with Israel.

Now it seems a Israeli spy firm maybe trying to manipulate Solvenia's elections.

[Apolitical @Apolitical3678]

The rage and vitriol from the jewish community over this is because anyone this close to the halls of power is supposed to be closely vetted for allegiance to Israel.

Having a conscience and objecting to the plans Israel has for America is strictly forbidden.

This sets a bad precedent for our jewish occupied government as it shows how much public support is behind individuals taking a stand and just how unpopular they are

[New Direction AFRICA @Its_ereko]

🇯🇵⚽ Japanese legend Keisuke Honda just told the truth:

"I personally want Iran to participate in the World Cup."

A US sponsor paused his ad deal. Because he said it.

Honda's response? "We're better off without companies that ignore the essence and make rotten decisions."

This is what integrity looks like. In sports. In business. In life.

A football legend stands up. A sponsor backs down. Honda doesn't blink.

Iran has been bombed for weeks. Children killed. Schools destroyed. Hospitals hit. And a US company punishes an athlete for saying they should play football?

The rot is everywhere. Honda named it. The world should hear it.

The message is spreading. The sponsor is exposed. The athlete is unbowed.

Companies that ignore the essence? We're better off without them.

Honda just became bigger than football. He became a voice. For Iran. For truth. For standing up when it costs you.

Respect. From Tokyo to Tehran. The world is watching. And learning.

[Harrison H. Smith ✞ @HarrisonHSmith]

I watched hundreds and hundreds of clips to make this.

Hours and hours and hours of Jewish groups, speeches, discussions, etc.

Never once did I hear about any sort of virtue, charity, outreach, or anything that represented a positive outcome to anyone outside of their own in-group.

This might sound obvious, but it’s disturbing as someone who is Christian, that when you think about activities of the Church, it’s almost entirely about outreach - it’s all charity and saving souls and providing service. Mission trips to build houses in Honduras, or orphanages in Uganda.

With Jewish groups, there is no outreach. They don’t want converts, they have no “message” to spread, no moral obligation to uplift others.

The only virtues they ever express are, in fact, complete inversions. They’ll talk about “truth” a lot, but all they mean is that videos of dead Palestinian children need to be repressed so the “truth” that they are all terrorists can dominate.

Same with “peace.” Basically, “peace” is when Israel can murder with impunity and “terrorism” is when their victims defend themselves.

But outside of “truth”(lies) and “peace” (war) the “values” they discuss are not moral values, but the physical well-being of themselves.

I am happy to be corrected - feel free to comment here with any videos you can find of Jewish groups unselfishly helping others.

[Billie Nelson @Mamabenergy2]

For reference, this is how Randy Fine votes in Florida! Isn't that right @VoteRandyFine ?