@inksearcher They were reactionary philistines, blurring the distinction between the city and country by abolishing the city as a whole, deindustrialing the land and being utopians while still maintaing the state apparatus
@inksearcher "perfect"? They weren't EVEN communists
And I wasn't suggesting that you support the Nazis (thought you do behave like them), I was simply telling you how much moral superiority the Soviets had over every other nation in ww2
@inksearcher Even Marx said not to go about doing this symbolic ass bullshit
The abolition of the state, classes and currency is gradual; and not immediate
@TheGyropath@inksearcher Pol Pot was literally listed as an anti Soviet guerrilla, favourable for collaboration under the CIA's own database.
Not to mention the Sino Soviet split led to China being pro US temporarily as well
@inksearcher@absolutedegen34 A large scale colonial war would sap Western Europe of resources or no longer had (or deserved)
The Soviets would size the opportunity to crush you all.
Besides, it was much more profitable to maintain a favourable economic presence than both military and economic for europe
@TheGyropath@mayriv2@inksearcher Going by your standards, capitalism has killed billions, including famines, presentable disasters, wars, etc
I don't see you having a problem with that