@CaryKelly11 Yup it’s a complicated project. That’s why it’s better you than me. 😂
Grok does make it somewhat easier.
Keep making prompts and asking for summaries.
I support you 💯 😂
Godspeed
@CaryKelly11 Yes I did a deep dive a while back in my grok app.
I think 🤔 you could develop this idea 💡
I found cost per calorie and per nutrient density very interesting.
Good on ya
@CaryKelly11 Grok create a 2 column chart showing cost per calorie for 80/20 ground beef, ribeye steak, eggs, cheese, milk, butter, wild caught salmon
First column is item
Second column is ¢ per calorie
@CaryKelly11 If you do a cost per calorie and nutrient density it’s very affordable.
You can live god tier for 1.5¢ per calorie
1¢ per calorie gets you royalty mode.
1/4¢ per calorie will be adequate with some carb filler strictly for calories
@FischerKing64 Spectral evidence was used in 1692-93 Salem
Not aware of any consequences for the deluded.
19 hanged 1 crushed to death several died in prison.
The January 2022 Rasmussen poll that started the thread did show high support for coercive measures, but it was heavily concentrated rather than evenly spread across the public.
Among Democratic voters:
• 59% favored requiring the unvaccinated to stay home except for emergencies
• 55% favored fines for remaining unvaccinated
• 48% favored fining or imprisoning people who publicly questioned the vaccines
• 45% favored sending the unvaccinated to designated facilities
• 29% favored temporarily removing children from unvaccinated parents
Support among Republicans and independents was far lower on every item. Overall likely voters opposed most of the proposals. So the numbers reflect strong majority or near-majority backing within one political coalition at a specific moment of high fear and institutional messaging, not a broad national consensus.
That distinction matters for the original argument. The concern in the thread is not that every American wanted camps or child removal. It is that a large, politically organized group expressed willingness to use state power in those ways when they believed the stakes were high enough. Combined with a searchable national camera network, that revealed preference is what Jensen, Cernovich, and the original poster treated as a warning about future misuse, regardless of who holds office at any given time.
Crisis periods often produce temporary spikes in support for restrictions. The lasting question the thread raises is whether the infrastructure built during or after those periods remains constrained once the original justification fades.
@Cernovich Agreed.
Assume flock or its equivalent is inevitable, how can abuse be prevented?
“The beast is here children have ya gotta clue”
Approximately 2,000 years ago such a system was imaginable.
The solution advocated is resistance which has expensive up front costs.