@FitMarshmellow There's an even better method though, that's kind of partly that, but better actually.
Check out the mihon app: https://t.co/an50LnUhng
This right here also gives you the gist of it:https://t.co/QmXetMiZ1l
And this could also be useful as well: https://t.co/eDOYu4hSt4
But
@ShinyStallion9@nekollx@DrunkSuperman3 I think overall we can just agree to disagree haha, and at least agree that it was handled rather poorly in some respects hehe. Cool ๐.
@ShinyStallion9@nekollx@DrunkSuperman3 Almost didn't wanna respond but you dragged me back haha.
Anyways, I'll just say that,like I said before,it could be said that it's basically alluded to here.And I'd argue it's no less implicit in that than how it is in regards to WW's "the lies" arc from rebirth. Nevertheless,
@ShinyStallion9@nekollx@DrunkSuperman3 did (golden age, pre crisis, post crisis/pre flashpoint, & post flashpoint). The marvel one for example had 6 issues rather than 4, and it had a lot more stuff haha. But ey, what can ya do? ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Anyways dude, nice talking to ya, but lets just leave it at that ok? Cool, cheers ๐ป๐
@ShinyStallion9@nekollx@DrunkSuperman3 citations and visual reference. That doesn't mean that ONLY the things that it DID mention are what's canon and the rest didn't happen...I wish it were that simple haha, but it ain't. Like part of the reason why it feels kinda short is how they split it in the eras that they
@ShinyStallion9@nekollx@DrunkSuperman3 interpretation. Which is what I said before that it was during 52 that Lois and clark were split in 2 and went thru convergence where jon was and yayada, you already read the rest on that. 2/2
@ShinyStallion9@nekollx@DrunkSuperman3 Hey, if there's something we can agree on man, it's those last three things you said haha. You're right, we can only guess, and though I am sticking with my guess, I won't argue that it was constructed poorly like you said haha. Ah well ๐คทโโ๏ธ
@ShinyStallion9@nekollx@DrunkSuperman3 Those inconsistencies are really referring to that origins really, that's all. Like how Diana's was retconned through an in universe revelation in early rebirth...
@ShinyStallion9@nekollx@DrunkSuperman3 citations for Jon's birth, it cites Convergence and nothing else. They could've cited any among the several other issues that have depicted his birth before but they chose to leave it with just Convergence. They could've done like other characters where they cite like the
@ShinyStallion9@nekollx@DrunkSuperman3 cosmic retcon to history like Superman Reborn seemed to be at the time.
Third of all, regarding Superman reborn, I have reason to believe that the book also incidentally turns it into sort of an in-universe thing as well. What I mean by that is that if you look at the
@ShinyStallion9@nekollx@DrunkSuperman3 this part though, I'm sure you'd think the same, ah well. Anyways, kudos if you actually read all this lol, cheers ๐.
@ShinyStallion9@nekollx@DrunkSuperman3 keep thinking it the way I currently see it, but I guess I get where you're coming from haha. If I was the boss at DC I'd just make my interpretation the explicitly canon one, but alas, I ain't the boss, what can I do? Ah well ๐คทโโ๏ธ haha. I do wish they had put more thought into