If a man and woman both choose to drink and use drugs and get drunk and high and then have sex -- which, I'm sorry to break it to people, is not a rare occurrence -- is the man guilty of rape, or is the woman guilty of rape, or is it both and neither?
If, in a male/female couple, the man gets super drunk and high and then woman doesn't, and then they have sex, is she guilty of rape?
If both the Cornell accuser and at least some of the accused voluntarily chose to drink and do drugs and have sex -- as happened -- why is the man accused of rape but not the woman?
@leandroruschel@malugaspar Mais uma vez, todo mundo revoltado com o STF/TSE. Mas é incrível que as pessoas acreditem que, se o Flávio for eleito, ele vai poder mudar alguma coisa. Se eleito, dificilmente vai tomar posse. Se empossado, não vai conseguir governar.
@leandroruschel@malugaspar É asquerosa essa equivalência que a Malu Gaspar faz, “o Flávio se aproveitou da situação para não vir”. O cara vai participar de um debate todo armado contra ele?
@STF_oficial Se ela tivesse falado exatamente a mesma coisa do Eduardo, quem advinha qual seria a punição para ela?
Adeus juízes. Não passam de ativistas. Escoria!
Some things are better left unasked. AI is inhuman and can be dangerous. I’m not talking about doomsday. It can be very personal.
About two months ago, I asked Grok to restore an old picture in which there’s this girl with whom I fell in love 30 years ago (!) and did nothing about it. Grok did it and did it too well. Boy! You wouldn’t believe what happened next. Just be careful what you ask.
🔴ELIMINATED: Saher Nidal Latfi Sakr, a terrorist operative affiliated with global jihadist organizations operating in Gaza. Among other activities, he supplied weapons to Hamas during the war.
Sakr infiltrated Israel during the October 7 Massacre and drove the motorcycle used to abduct Noa Argamani and Avinatan Or from the Nova music festival into Gaza.
Recently, Sakr advanced attacks targeting Israeli civilians & IDF troops. He was eliminated in order to remove the threat he posed.
Sobre o discurso divisivo, preconceituoso e desagregador da primeira-dama: SC é o pesadelo do PT, porque representa tudo que o Brasil poderia ser e (ainda) não é.
Para análises exclusivas, todas as manhãs, até o 2º turno, se inscreva na nossa newsletter https://t.co/xRF9SUWK2l
For over 10 years I’ve been subject to corrupt family judges (not only biased ones), to all sorts of false accusations, humiliation attempts, and things that I can’t mention here, in ways that you can’t possibly imagine. I have every reason to hate how men and boys are treated as aggressors and criminals by default while women are always treated as victims.
And I do believe a man has the right to fight back with all his power depending on the circumstances. But NOT in this case. There’s a variety of things the kid could have done to stop the girl. Punching the smaller and weaker girl and continuing to punch her on her face when she was no longer reacting is cowardice and nothing more.
Friedrich Hayek – The Man Who Gave the Counter-March Its Strategy.
Gramsci invented the long march through the institutions. Dutschke gave it its name. They built the infrastructure of the left’s cultural dominance – and it worked. But there was a man on the other side who understood the mechanism just as clearly and built a counter-strategy that produced Thatcher, Reagan, and Milei. His name was Friedrich Hayek. And his strategy is still underused – including in Poland.
1. The key text is not The Road to Serfdom. It is a 1949 essay almost nobody has read: The Intellectuals and Socialism. Why do socialist ideas keep winning politically, even when the evidence against them accumulates? Because you are watching the final stage of a process that began decades earlier. Before any idea reaches parliament, it circulates among academics. From them it passes to the secondhand dealers – the writers, teachers, journalists who translate abstract ideas into the common assumptions of an entire society. By the time the politician acts, the intellectual work is already done. The politician is not the beginning of change. He is its final expression.
2. He called them secondhand dealers in ideas – the most important role in the intellectual supply chain. The academic produces the idea. The secondhand dealer makes it thinkable for millions who will never read the academic paper. If he wrote the essay today he would add influencers, podcasters, and profiles like this one to the list. The mechanism is the same. The distribution is faster. Which is why the counter-march can now move at a speed Hayek could not have imagined.
3. He did not stop at the essay. He built institutions. The Mont Pelerin Society – 1947. The Atlas Network – founded after Hayek explained the way to change society was not to enter politics but to change the intellectual climate first. These institutions spent decades producing ideas considered radical and politically impossible – and then Thatcher happened. Then Reagan. Then Milei. Thatcher said of them: "There were not many of them, not everyone wanted to listen – but they were right, and they saved Great Britain."
4. The difference between the Gramscian left and the Hayekian right is not the strategy. The strategy is the same: change the intellectual climate, move the Overton Window, wait for the political moment when what was previously unthinkable becomes inevitable. The difference is that the left funded it systematically for fifty years. The right understood it in theory and underfunded it in practice – treating independent think tanks as expensive hobbies rather than load-bearing infrastructure for ideas you want to become policy.
5. Both sides understood the mechanism. One funded it properly. The other kept looking for the politician — the next Reagan, the next Milei — without understanding that before each of them there were decades of institutional work that nobody filmed. You cannot skip the intellectual work and go straight to the politician. Someone must produce the ideas. Someone must translate them for millions. Someone must fund the institutions that do both for twenty years, including when the ideas are unfashionable.
6. The series you are reading is the Hayekian strategy running at 2026 speed. The secondhand dealing – civilizational argument translated into the format that reaches millions who will never read Gramsci or Hayek but who recognize the mechanism when they see it named. Musk and Milei repost it because they recognize the intellectual supply chain working in real time. The Overton Window is moving. The counter-march has a distribution platform the left cannot control.
7. Hayek died in 1992, vindicated on everything, implemented insufficiently. And then the tide came back – because the intellectual infrastructure was never built at the scale the long march had built theirs. We are building it now. This series is part of it. The work is not finished. It has barely begun.
The only core issue is that Brazil should not exist in the first place. Brazil was never founded; it was never thought of. The country is a leftover from a royal family fight, and later a fake republic.
There’s no political solution. Even if Moraes and several others are axed, Congress will still be controlled by regional mobsters. The ground rules will remain the same.
Two possible solutions: Brazil ceases to exist. I’m talking about separatism (complicated). Or a completely new constitution establishing a real federation, using the American one as a reference, with the states as independent as possible from Brasilia.
It’s not going to happen. In fact, just talking about solutions like these can get you arrested.
É verdade que o Brasil sofreu um golpe. Não foi apenas uma tentativa, longe disso. O golpe não apenas foi efetivado, como continua em andamento. Até o momento, esse golpe foi efetuado em quatro atos:
2019: Manobra jurídica do STF para retirar Lula da prisão, mais conhecida como "justificativa do CEP".
2021: Anulação das condenações da Lava Jato com base em conversas de whatsapp obtidas ilegamente e com o intuito de tornar Sérgio Moro suspeito para que Lula pudesse se tornar novamente elegível.
2022: Atuação claramente desigual do TSE, proibindo declarações verdadeiras sobre o passado de Lula e punindo qualquer questionamento sobre essa atuação. Tudo isso enquanto a esquerda manteve total liberdade para chamar Bolsonaro de genocida, pedófilo etc.
2025: Prisão de Bolsonaro, retirando do pleito de 2026 o candidato mais competitivo da direita. Aqui foi consumado o golpe até então.
Eles não vão parar. O próximo ato está em pleno andamento e eles farão de tudo para que @FlavioBolsonaro não seja eleito. No momento, os únicos que podem atrapalhar um pouco esses planos são Kassio Nunes e André Mendonça. Que não se curvem diante do grande mal que assola o país.
E por fim, não precisam acreditar em mim. Deixo registrada aqui a leitura integral do ministro Luiz Fux por ocasião do julgamento da "Trama golpista", no qual absolveu Jair Bolsonaro de todas as acusações. Esse voto será utilizado no futuro para mostrar a realidade do período em que estamos vivendo.
This.
Is.
AMAZING.
@IWV (and of course, @IWF) gets it. Democratic Socialists have NO idea what their bright ideas would look like in real life.
Watch. Share.
Send to your leftist friends … socialism sucks.