FlowMan

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@akarlin That's great. russia should stop pretending to be something it isn't and go back to its roots as a predominantly asian country.
Europeans simply do not want unrestricted access to Europe for people who support aggression and imperial ambitions.

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@shwablyk_palaie Однозначно!
Але ви не переймайтесь, в плані охоплення, цей наратив в сотні тисяч разів програє набагато більш прогресивним наративам, які молоді дівчата черпають із тік років, інстраграмів і онлі фансів.

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@Caelrie @WendyRWang @FamStudies For me, this isn't a revelation.
What we hear 99% of the time is that men need to step up, while women should maintain or even raise their standards.
And such a narrative has very little to do with the underlying causes of the trends we're seeing.

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@Schuldensuehner Germans need to double down on green transition and feminist movement. This will definitely change the dynamics.
Oh, wait a moment...

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@Caelrie @WendyRWang @FamStudies Again. This is nothing different for men. And it was the same always.
But you are at least honest that the trend we see now in terms of declining marriage rates and childless is women's responsibility.

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@Caelrie @WendyRWang @FamStudies I am sorry, but your explanation doesn't hold water.
If you have any viable arguments then please write them. I am genuinely interested.

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@not_a_ruscist @M0nstas Almost all Ukrainians admire Trump!
Such a strong leader!

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@M0nstas @Casualdiot2 This will be a lobby of a Trump Tower in Yalta!

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@Caramellania @sunny_whale_2 Лол
Тому я вам напишу останнє повідомлення:у пані під 40 тис підписників,бог його знає скільки там на всяких онлі фансах і т.д.
Я гарантую,що багато чоловіків,проявляло увагу і зацікавлювали її і т.д. якщо пані одна,то це її вибір.
Тому немає абсолютно ніякого сенсу зацікавлювати

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@jakozloski Of course, because looks and height is understood by default.
I do believe though, that if guy is reach then women can compromise on looks and height.

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@Caramellania @sunny_whale_2 Ви 3-4 речі хоча б можете назвати?

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@Caelrie @WendyRWang @FamStudies That's something I hope women can explain.
I am a message, so what's your explanation?

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@Caelrie @WendyRWang @FamStudies Again, if you think that's why men formed families, you're wrong.
The fact remains: as women gained the benefits and independence men traditionally had, marriage became less attractiveand marriage rates declined.
That's a reality and it is entirely on women.

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@rrdct @Pashak1436 Я бачу, мій легкий натяк на причинно-наслідкові зв'язки на вас не подіяв.
Ну так і буде

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@so_zhe_zhe "боже яке дурне"!

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@Caelrie @WendyRWang @FamStudies Your argument makes no sense. Men can cook, clean, and take care of themselves. If that's why men formed families, it's a strange conclusion.
Women now have the same financial independence men traditionally had, yet marriage seems less attractive to them. What changed?

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@BradWilcoxIFS @lymanstoneky Women will probably find another thousand reasons why it's men's fault rather than questioning their own assumptions or decisions.

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@Caelrie @WendyRWang @FamStudies Of course, but this is nothing new.
That's precisely the point. It was optional for men, and they used resources to form families. It is optional for women, and they find it "less attractive".

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@SmalllIvy @WendyRWang @FamStudies Exactly. It's not just about contribution. Many refuse to form families while demanding an ever-larger share of the benefits.
They won't get it.
The results are already becoming visible, and I doubt much will change.

[FlowMan @FlowMan92]

@Caramellania @sunny_whale_2 Про які "зусилля" конкретно іде мова?