“$10M CALL SWEEP” is not a verdict.
It could be a hedge, spread leg, roll—or real directional demand.
Flow Verdict separates what the tape proves from what the headline assumes,
then revisits the case at T+1.
Follow to see which headlines survive the evidence.
$GOOGL earnings put still does not prove bearish demand—even after OI updated.
Jul 24 $345P: 12,452 contracts, $13.0M gross. Current OI: 13,814. NBBO: unresolved. Package: unresolved. Opening/closing: unresolved. Next proof: full-package + execution-side review.
TSLA reports after today’s close.Jul 21 Jul 24 380C traded 7684 contracts for 41.7M gross premium 5.4K/contract.NBBO side/package legs unresolved. Verdict big pre-event activity does not prove bullish https://t.co/zJayVyDobQ proof T+1 OI + full-package review.
$529,000,000 hit $GOOGL options in ONE day (Jul 15).
Three days: ~$1.25B in betting cash.
One Sep $410 call open alone: ~$59M.
Ticket prices:
Jul24 $350C ~$9–10 → ~$900–$1,000 per contract
Jul24 $362.5C ~$5 → ~$500+ each
Priced swing off ~$347:
about $330 to $365.
Huge money. Expensive bets. Wide band.
Calls and puts both showed size — not one clean side.
Huge table. Tickets cost hundreds each.
Priced for a real swing — both sides still at the table.
$MU — don’t buy the headline.
900/950/1000C ~$101M looked huge.
Path: gap → mid call → late 940P buy (~1,005 lots / $2.7M)
Call blocks had sell-side. This is lock/hedge risk, not “$100M bullish.”
$TSM — the clean one.
Aug21 410C ~$21M · 420C ~$15M
Open: 850 + 786 lots @ ~$24 on 420C
Spot $424.61 (+5.55%)
Tomorrow: OI on 410/420 must rise or it’s just volume.
Est. only (intrinsic @ ~$3.2):
Jun 4 13:50 — Jul 17 $2C 21,783 lots ask
Entry ~$0.30 → cost ~$0.65M → value ~$2.6M → ≈ +$2M (~4x) on that print alone.
Jun 1 13:45 — Jun 18 $2C 3,225 lots → rough +$0.3M same path.
$3C paper needs a bigger gap-up to lottery; $2C was the real lottery strike.
“$10M CALL SWEEP” is not a verdict.
It could be a hedge, spread leg, roll—or real directional demand.
Flow Verdict separates what the tape proves from what the headline assumes,
then revisits the case at T+1.
Follow to see which headlines survive the evidence.
5/ FLOW VERDICT
The rally was real. “Calls drove it” was too simple.
Stock gap → calls confirm → turnover fades → late put-heavy mix.
940P may be protection, a roll or closing flow. T+1 OI is the next test.
Follow for the ruling. Research only. Not financial advice.
4/ 13:00–15:49 | CONFIRMATION BREAKS
13–14: MU hit $982.88, then slipped. Calls $8.5M vs 940P $3.2M, but call gross
halved again.
14–15:49: calls $9.1M vs 940P $12.5M. MU closed $970.82, 1.2% below the high.
The mix flipped only after spot had already stalled.
1/ 09:30–11:00 ET | STOCK LED
MU: $865.46 prior close → $925.35 open (+6.9% gap) → $945.38.
Call trio: $39.8M gross / 15,593 contracts.
940P: $1.6M / 377.
The gap existed first. Calls confirmed the rebound; they did not create the
opening +6.9%.
$MU closed +12.2%. Its 900/950/1000C trio printed $101.4M gross.
Headline: “calls drove the rally.” The hourly tape says that’s incomplete.
Stock led the gap. Calls confirmed the middle. Call turnover faded before the
high. From 14:00, 940P overtook all 3 calls combined. 🧵