DoTheThing (dtt) 2.0 released, which now uses Claude Fable 5 as the default model, with GPT 5.5 still the default as the Oracle.
Note that --fast still uses Opus 4.8, as there isn't a fast variant of Fable 5 just yet.
dtt --update to grab it, or install from:
https://t.co/jdvhlzvNgk
I have a question about all the complaints about Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire.
Yes, it's a lot of money (on paper, not sitting in a bank account). Yes, there are real problems that remain unsolved. No amount of money, and no system of government tried thus far, has fixed them. But that's a separate fight.
Here's what I actually don't understand:
When Roger Bannister broke the 4-minute mile in 1954, nobody said "let's make sure he's also the last." Nobody blamed their own slow legs on him. Nobody wrote "Roger Bannister broke the mile, here's how to properly hate him." None of the politicians and regulators stood up to explain why his record was secretly a bad thing.
I get that there's an obvious objection: running fast takes nothing from anyone, but wealth is rivalrous, so therefore the analogy os brplem. But even that isn't true. Bannister didn't win alone - Chataway and Brasher paced him, a track was built, a sport's worth of accumulated training science carried him. We don't say he "took advantage" of his pacers or his coach or the people who built the track. We understand that an exceptional outcome sits on top of a system of other people's effort, and we celebrate the person who reached the frontier despite that (or maybe BECAUSE of that).
So why is that obvious in sport and forbidden in business? The pacer, the coach, the tracklayer, everyone around become "exploited labour". The frontier becomes "greed". The achievement becomes the indictment.
I think you should pick one: either standing on the shoulders of others taints the achievement, in which case go reclaim every world record ever set - or it doesn't, in which case explain what's actually different here. Be specific.
Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
82,000 signatures so far! we need MORE!!! there are 121,000 across all three petitions (some overlap obviously) but we need MORE!
https://t.co/7Lq4rP6f32 #SaveStargate
Sure, but throwing money at it has never solved the problem. The US spent $101.7b on SNAP last year, and yet ~14m people in the USA are starving, and an additional 34m are “food insecure” (struggling to consistently afford enough food).
When 14% of the population is malnourished despite this spending (and other programs + NGOs spending billions more) it’s clear that the existence of billionaires and a lone trillionaire isn’t the issue.
@BizMunny@fede_intern@cameron In 2015 it absolutely was moon math. I agree it’s *better* understood now, but not as rigorously researched and understood as many other cryptographic systems (even complex ones). I don’t think that’s an incorrect or invalid point to take.
I have had multiple agentic threads with Anthropic's Fable model where it refuses to do anything because I used the term "additive" or "value-accretive" or even "synergistic" and those words trigger the safeguards.
I've spent more time rewriting agentic tool calls (by hand) than doing actual work today.
Today we’re publishing Maelstrom's Bitcoin Grant Program Annual Report, for the period ending June 2026. The report covers the technical work of the four Maelstrom funded open source developers, working to improve Bitcoin, with respect to scalability, robustness and privacy.